Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Comparison of contrast-normalization and threshold models of the responses of simple cells in cat striate cortex

  • D. J. Tolhurst (a1) and D. J. Heeger (a2)

Abstract

In almost every study of the linearity of spatiotemporal summation in simple cells of the cat's visual cortex, there have been systematic mismatches between the experimental observations and the predictions of the linear theory. These mismatches have generally been explained by supposing that the initial spatiotemporal summation stage is strictly linear, but that the following output stage of the simple cell is subject to some contrast-dependent nonlinearity. Two main models of the output nonlinearity have been proposed: the threshold model (e.g. Tolhurst & Dean, 1987) and the contrast-normalization model (e.g. Heeger, 1992a, b). In this paper, the two models are fitted rigorously to a variety of previously published neurophysiological data, in order to determine whether one model is a better explanation of the data. We reexamine data on the interaction between two bar stimuli presented in different parts of the receptive field; on the relationship between the receptive-field map and the inverse Fourier transform of the spatial-frequency tuning curve; on the dependence of response amplitude and phase on the spatial phase of stationary gratings; on the relationships between the responses to moving and modulated gratings; and on the suppressive action of gratings moving in a neuron's nonpreferred direction. In many situations, the predictions of the two models are similar, but the contrast-normalization model usually fits the data slightly better than the threshold model, and it is easier to apply the equations of the normalization model. More importantly, the normalization model is naturally able to account very well for the details and subtlety of the results in experiments where the total contrast energy of the stimuli changes; some of these phenomena are completely beyond the scope of the threshold model. Rigorous application of the models' equations has revealed some situations where neither model fits quite well enough, and we must suppose, therefore, that there are some subtle nonlinearities still to be characterized.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Albrecht, D.G. (1995). Visual cortex neurons in monkey and cat: Effect of contrast on the spatial and temporal phase transfer functions. Visual Neuroscience 12, 11911210.
Albrecht, D.G. & Geisler, W.S. (1991). Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience 7, 531546.
Albrecht, D.G. & Hamilton, D.B. (1982). Striate cortex of monkey and cat: Contrast response function. Journal of Neurophysiology 48, 217237.
Andrews, B.W. & Pollen, D.A. (1979). Relationship between spatial frequency selectivity and receptive field profile of simple cells. Journal of Physiology 287, 163176.
Atick, J.J. & Redlich, A.N. (1990). Mathematical model of the simple cells in the visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics 63, 99109.
Bauman, L.A. & Bonds, A.B. (1991). Inhibitory refinement of spatial frequency selectivity in single cells of the cat striate cortex. Vision Research 31, 933944.
Bonds, A.B. (1989). Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience 2, 4155.
Carandini, M. & Heeger, D.J. (1994). Summation and division by neurons in primate visual cortex. Science 264, 13331336.
Carandini, M., Heeger, D.J. & Movshon, J.A. (1997). Linearity and gain control in VI simple cells. In Cerebral Cortex, Vol.XII, Cortical Models, ed. Jones, E.G. & Ulinski, P.S., New York: Plenum Press.
Dean, A.F. (1981a). The relationship between response amplitude and contrast for cat striate cortical neurones. Journal of Physiology 318, 413427.
Dean, A.F. (1981b). The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex. Experimental Brain Research 44, 437440.
Dean, A.F. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1983). On the distinctness of simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat. Journal of Physiology 344, 305325.
Dean, A.F., Hess, R.F. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1980). Divisive inhibition involved in directional selectivity. Journal of Physiology 308, 8485P.
DeAngelis, G.C., Ohzawa, I. & Freeman, R.D. (1993). Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II, Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. Journal of Neurophysiology 69, 11181135.
DeAngelis, G.C., Robson, J.G., Ohzawa, I. & Freeman, R.D. (1992). Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 68, 144163.
De Valois, K. & Tootell, R. (1983). Spatial-frequency specific inhibition in cat striate cortex cells. Journal of Physiology 336, 359376.
De Valois, R.L., Albrecht, D.G. & Thorell, L.G. (1978). Cortical cells: Bar and edge detectors or spatial-frequency analyzers. In Frontiers in Visual Science, ed. Cool, S.J. & Smith, E.L., pp. 544556. New York: Springer Verlag.
De Valois, R.L., Thorell, L.G. & Albrecht, D.G. (1985). Periodicity of striate cortex cell receptive fields. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 11151123.
Emerson, R.C. & Huang, M.C. (1997). Quadrature subunits in direction-ally selective simple cells: Counterphase and drifting grating responses. Visual Neuroscience 14, 373385.
Enroth-Cugell, C. & Robson, J.G. (1966). The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. Journal of Physiology 187, 517552.
Ferster, D. (1988). Spatially opponent excitation and inhibition in simple cells of the cat visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 8, 11721180.
Ferster, D. & Jagadeesh, B. (1992). EPSP-IPSP interactions in cat visual cortex studied with in vivo whole-cell patch recording. Journal of Neuroscience 12, 12621274.
Geisler, W.S. & Albrecht, D.G. (1992). Cortical neurons: Isolation of contrast gain control. Vision Research 32, 14091410.
Geisler, W.S. & Albrecht, D.G. (1995). Bayesian analysis of identification performance in monkey visual cortex: Nonlinear mechanisms and stimulus certainty. Vision Research 35, 27232730.
Glezer, V.D., Tsherbach, T.A., Gauselman, V.E. & Bondarko, V.M. (1982). Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields of the cat striate cortex. Biological Cybernetics 43, 3549.
Grossberg, S. (1988). Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms and architectures. Neural Networks 1, 1761.
Gulyas, B., Orban, G., Duysens, J. & Maes, H. (1987). The suppressive influence of moving textured backgrounds on responses of cat striate cortex neurons to moving bars. Journal of Neurophysiology 57, 17671791.
Hamilton, D.B., Albrecht, D.G. & Geisler, W.S. (1989). Visual cortical receptive fields in monkey and cat: Spatial and temporal phase transfer function. Vision Research 29, 12851308.
Hammond, P. & MacKay, D.M. (1981). Modulatory influences of moving textured backgrounds on responsiveness of simple cells in feline striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 319, 431442.
Heeger, D.J. (1991). Nonlinear model of neural responses in cat visual cortex. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, ed. Landy, M. & Movshon, J.A., pp. 119133. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Heeger, D.J. (1992 a). Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience 9, 181197.
Heeger, D.J. (1992b). Half-squaring in responses of cat simple cells. Visual Neuroscience 9, 427443.
Heeger, D.J. (1993). Modeling simple-cell direction selectivity with normalized, half-squared, linear operators. Journal of Neurophysiology 70, 18851898.
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 148, 574591.
Ikeda, H. & Wright, M.J. (1974). Sensitivity of neurones in visual cortex (area 17) under different levels of anaesthesia. Experimental Brain Research 20, 471484.
Jagadeesh, B., Gray, C.M. & Ferster, D. (1992). Visually evoked oscillations of membrane potential in cells of cat visual cortex. Science 257, 552554.
Jagadeesh, B., Wheat, H.S. & Ferster, D. (1993). Linearity of summation of synaptic potentials underlying direction selectivity in simple cells of the cat visual cortex. Science 262, 19011904.
Jones, J.P. & Palmer, L.A. (1987). An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in the cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 58, 12331258.
Koike, H., Mano, N., Okada, Y. & Oshima, T. (1970). Repetitive impulses generated in fast and slow pyramidal tract cells by intracellularly applied current steps. Experimental Brain Research 11, 263281.
Kulikowski, J.J. & Bishop, P.O. (1981). Linear analysis of the responses of simple cells in cat striate cortex. Experimental Brain Research 44, 386400.
Li, C.-Y. & Creutzfeldt, O. (1984). The representation of contrast and other stimulus parameters by single neurons in area 17 of the cat. Pflügers Archives 401, 304314.
Maffei, L. & Fiorentini, A. (1973). The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyzer. Vision Research 13, 12551267.
Maffei, L. & Fiorentini, A. (1976). The unresponsive regions of visual cortical receptive fields. Vision Research 16, 11311139.
Maffei, L., Morrone, M.C., Pirchio, M. & Sandini, G. (1979). Responses of visual cortical cells to periodic and non-periodic stimuli. Journal of Physiology 296, 2747.
Marr, D. (1970). A theory for cerebral neocortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 176, 161234.
Mason, A. & Larkman, A.U. (1990). Correlations between morphology and electrophysiology of pyramidal neurons in slices of rat visual cortex. II. Electrophysiology. Journal of Neuroscience 10, 14151428.
McCormick, D.A., Connors, B.W., Lighthall, J.W. & Prince, D.A. (1985). Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 54, 782806.
McLean, J., Raab, S. & Palmer, L.A. (1994). Contribution of linear mechanisms to the specification of local motion by simple cells in areas 17 & 18 of the cat. Visual Neuroscience 11, 271294.
Morrone, M.C., Burr, D.C. & Maffei, L. (1982). Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neuro-physiological evidence. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 216, 335354.
Movshon, J.A., Thompson, I.D. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1978 a). Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 283, 5377.
Movshon, J.A., Thompson, I.D. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1978 b). Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 283, 101120.
Mullikin, W.H., Jones, J.P. & Palmer, L.A. (1984). Receptive-field properties and laminar distribution of X-like and Y-like simple cells in cat area 17. Journal of Neurophysiology 52, 350371.
Nestares, O. & Heeger, D.J. (1997). Modeling the apparent frequency-specific suppression in simple cell responses. Vision Research (in press).
Ogawa, T., Ito, S. & Kato, H. (1981). Membrane characteristics of visual cortical neurons in in vitro slices. Brain Research 226, 315329.
Ohzawa, I., Sclar, G. & Freeman, R.D. (1982). Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex. Nature 298, 266268.
Palmer, L.A. & Davis, T.L. (1981). Receptive field structure in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 46, 260276.
Pollen, D.A., Gaska, J.P. & Jacobson, L.D. (1988). Responses of simple and complex cells to compound sine-wave gratings. Vision Research 28, 2539.
Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. & Vetterling, W.T. (1986). Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, R.C., Soodak, R.E. & Shapley, R.M. (1987). Linear mechanisms of directional selectivity in simple cells of cat striate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 84, 87408744.
Reid, R.C., Soodak, R.E. & Shapley, R.M. (1991). Directional selectivity and spatiotemporal structure of receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 66, 505529.
Robson, J.G. (1988). Linear and non-linear operations in the visual system. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 29, 117.
Robson, J.G., Tolhurst, D.J., Freeman, R.D. & Ohzawa, I. (1988). Simple cells in the visual cortex of the cat can be narrowly tuned for spatial frequency. Visual Neuroscience 1, 415419.
Schumer, R.A. & Movshon, J.A. (1984). Length summation in simple cells of cat striate cortex. Vision Research 24, 565571.
Shapley, R.M., Reid, R.C. & Soodak, R. (1991). Spatiotemporal receptive fields and direction selectivity. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, ed. Landy, M. & Movshon, J.A., pp. 109118. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Skottun, B.C., Bradley, A., Sclar, G., Ohzawa, I. & Freeman, R.D. (1987). The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: A comparison of single cells and behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology 57, 773786.
Tadmor, Y. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1989). The effect of threshold on the relationship between the receptive-field profile and the spatial-frequency tuning curve in simple cells of the cat's striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience 3, 445454.
Tolhurst, D.J. (1989). The amount of information transmitted about contrast by neurones in the cat's visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience 2, 409413.
Tolhurst, D.J. & Dean, A.F. (1987). Spatial summation by simple cells in the striate cortex of the cat. Experimental Brain Research 66, 607620.
Tolhurst, D.J. & Dean, A.F. (1990). The effects of contrast on the linearity of spatial summation of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. Experimental Brain Research 79, 582588.
Tolhurst, D.J. & Dean, A.F. (1991). Evaluation of a linear model of directional selectivity in simple cells of the cat's striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience 6, 421428.
Tolhurst, D.J. & Heeger, D.J. (1997). Contrast normalization and a linear model for the directional selectivity of simple cells in cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience 14, 1925.
Tolhurst, D.J. & Thompson, I.D. (1981). On the variety of spatial-frequency selectivities shown by neurons in area 17 of the cat. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 213, 183199.
Tolhurst, D.J., Movshon, J.A. & Dean, A.F. (1983). The statistical reliability of single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex. Vision Research 23, 775785.
Tolhurst, D.J., Movshon, J.A. & Thompson, I.D. (1981). The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast. Experimental Brain Research 41, 414419.
Vogels, R., Spileers, W. & Orban, G.A. (1989). The response variability of striate cortical neurons in behaving monkey. Experimental Brain Research 77, 432436.
Webster, M.A. & De Valois, R.L. (1985). Relationship between spatial-frequency & orientation tuning of striate-cortex cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2, 11241132.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Visual Neuroscience
  • ISSN: 0952-5238
  • EISSN: 1469-8714
  • URL: /core/journals/visual-neuroscience
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed