Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 27
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Mély, David A. Kim, Junkyung McGill, Mason Guo, Yuliang and Serre, Thomas 2016. A systematic comparison between visual cues for boundary detection. Vision Research, Vol. 120, p. 93.

    Teufel, Christoph and Nanay, Bence 2016. How to (and how not to) think about top-down influences on visual perception. Consciousness and Cognition,

    Bhardwaj, Manisha Carroll, Samuel Ma, Wei Ji and Josić, Krešimir 2015. Visual Decisions in the Presence of Measurement and Stimulus Correlations. Neural Computation, Vol. 27, Issue. 11, p. 2318.

    Fulvio, Jacqueline M. Maloney, Laurence T. and Schrater, Paul R. 2015. Revealing individual differences in strategy selection through visual motion extrapolation. Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 6, Issue. 4, p. 169.

    Marlow, Phillip J. and Anderson, Barton L. 2015. Material properties derived from three-dimensional shape representations. Vision Research, Vol. 115, p. 199.

    Sotiropoulos, Grigorios and Seriès, Peggy 2015. Biologically Inspired Computer Vision.

    Ghose, Tandra Liu, Janelle and Kellman, Philip J. 2014. Recovering metric properties of objects through spatiotemporal interpolation. Vision Research, Vol. 102, p. 80.

    Kubilius, Jonas Wagemans, Johan and Op de Beeck, Hans P. 2014. A conceptual framework of computations in mid-level vision. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, Vol. 8,

    Taylor, Gemma Hipp, Daniel Moser, Alecia Dickerson, Kelly and Gerhardstein, Peter 2014. The development of contour processing: evidence from physiology and psychophysics. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5,

    Zhao, Libo Cosman, Joshua D. Vatterott, Daniel B. Gupta, Prahlad and Vecera, Shaun P. 2014. Visual statistical learning can drive object-based attentional selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, Vol. 76, Issue. 8, p. 2240.

    Kastner, David B. and Baccus, Stephen A. 2013. Spatial Segregation of Adaptation and Predictive Sensitization in Retinal Ganglion Cells. Neuron, Vol. 79, Issue. 3, p. 541.

    Pamplona, D. Triesch, J. and Rothkopf, C.A. 2013. Power spectra of the natural input to the visual system. Vision Research, Vol. 83, p. 66.

    Ben-Yosef, Guy and Ben-Shahar, Ohad 2012. A Tangent Bundle Theory for Visual Curve Completion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 34, Issue. 7, p. 1263.

    Gerhardstein, Peter Tse, James Dickerson, Kelly Hipp, Daniel and Moser, Alecia 2012. The human visual system uses a global closure mechanism. Vision Research, Vol. 71, p. 18.

    Hunt, Jonathan J. Mattingley, Jason B. and Goodhill, Geoffrey J. 2012. Randomly oriented edge arrangements dominate naturalistic arrangements in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, Vol. 64, p. 49.

    Ma, Wei Ji 2012. Organizing probabilistic models of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 16, Issue. 10, p. 511.

    Narayanan, Maruthi and Kimia, Benjamin 2012. 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. p. 47.

    Saad, M. A. Bovik, A. C. and Charrier, C. 2012. Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 21, Issue. 8, p. 3339.

    van den Berg, R. Vogel, M. Josic, K. and Ma, W. J. 2012. Optimal inference of sameness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue. 8, p. 3178.

    Anderson, Barton L. O'Vari, Judit and Barth, Hilary 2011. Non-Bayesian Contour Synthesis. Current Biology, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 492.


Contour statistics in natural images: Grouping across occlusions

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2009

Correctly interpreting a natural image requires dealing properly with the effects of occlusion, and hence, contour grouping across occlusions is a major component of many natural visual tasks. To better understand the mechanisms of contour grouping across occlusions, we (a) measured the pair-wise statistics of edge elements from contours in natural images, as a function of edge element geometry and contrast polarity, (b) derived the ideal Bayesian observer for a contour occlusion task where the stimuli were extracted directly from natural images, and then (c) measured human performance in the same contour occlusion task. In addition to discovering new statistical properties of natural contours, we found that naïve human observers closely parallel ideal performance in our contour occlusion task. In fact, there was no region of the four-dimensional stimulus space (three geometry dimensions and one contrast dimension) where humans did not closely parallel the performance of the ideal observer (i.e., efficiency was approximately constant over the entire space). These results reject many other contour grouping hypotheses and strongly suggest that the neural mechanisms of contour grouping are tightly related to the statistical properties of contours in natural images.

Corresponding author
*Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Wilson S. Geisler, Center for Perceptual Systems, 1 University Station A8000, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Beck , A. Rosenfeld & R Ivry . (1989). Line segregation. Spatial Vision 4, 75101.

E. Brunswik & J Kamiya . (1953). Ecological cue-validity of ‘proximity’ and other Gestalt factors. American Journal of Psychology 66, 2032.

J.H. Elder & R.M Goldberg . (2002). Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. Journal of Vision 2, 324353.

J Feldman . (2001). Bayesian contour integration. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 11711182.

D.J. Field , A. Hayes & R.F. Hess (1993). Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local ‘association field’. Vision Research 33, 173193.

D.J. Field , A. Hayes & R.F. Hess (2000). The role of polarity and symmetry in perceptual grouping of contour fragments. Spatial Vision 13, 5166.

W.S. Geisler (2008). Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 10.1110.26.

W.S. Geisler , J.S. Perry , B.J. Super & D.P. Gallogly (2001). Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance. Vision Research 41, 711724.

C.M. Grossberg & E Mingolla . (1985). Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychological Review 92, 173211.

P.J Kellman . (2003). Interpolation processes in the visual perception of objects. Neural Networks 16, 915923.

P.J. Kellman & T.F Shipley . (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology 23, 141221.

I. Kovacs & B Julesz . (1993). A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: Effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90, 74957497.

D. Martin , C. Fowlkes & J Malik . (2004). Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color and texture cues. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 26, 530549.

H. Neumann & E Mingolla . (2001). Computational models of spatial integration in perceptual grouping. In From Fragments to Objects: Grouping and Segmentation in Vision, ed. T.F. Shipley & P.J. Kellman , pp. 353400. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.

P. Parent & S Zucker . (1989). Trace inference, curvature consistency and curve detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11, 823839.

S. Sha'ashua & S Ullman . (1988). Structural saliency: The detection of globally salient structures using a locally connected network. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Vision, 321327.

M. Sigman , G.A. Cecchi , C.D. Gilbert & M.O Magnasco . (2001). On a common circle: Natural scenes and Gestalt rules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98, 19351940.

M. Singh & J.M Fulvio . (2005). Visual extrapolation of contour geometry. PNAS 102, 939944.

M. Singh & J.M Fulvio . (2007). Bayesian contour extrapolation: Geometric determinants of good continuation. Vision Research 47, 783798.

T. Tversky , W.S. Geisler & J.S Perry . (2004). Contour grouping: Closure effects are explained by good continuation and proximity. Vision Research 44, 27692777.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Visual Neuroscience
  • ISSN: 0952-5238
  • EISSN: 1469-8714
  • URL: /core/journals/visual-neuroscience
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *