Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 33
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Barham, Michael P. Enticott, Peter G. Conduit, Russell and Lum, Jarrad A.G. 2016. Transcranial electrical stimulation during sleep enhances declarative (but not procedural) memory consolidation: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 63, p. 65.


    Dedoncker, Josefien Brunoni, Andre R. Baeken, Chris and Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne 2016. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Samples: Influence of Stimulation Parameters. Brain Stimulation, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 501.


    Granovsky, Y. Liem, K.S. Weissman-Fogel, I. Yarnitsky, D. Chistyakov, A. and Sinai, A. 2016. ‘Virtual lesion’ in pain research; a study on magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex. European Journal of Pain, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 241.


    Horvath, Jared Cooney Vogrin, Simon J. Carter, Olivia Cook, Mark J. and Forte, Jason D. 2016. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions. Experimental Brain Research,


    Sellaro, Roberta Nitsche, Michael A. and Colzato, Lorenza S. 2016. The stimulated social brain: effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on social cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1369, Issue. 1, p. 218.


    Garnett, Emily O. Malyutina, Svetlana Datta, Abhishek and den Ouden, Dirk-Bart 2015. On the Use of the Terms Anodal and Cathodal in High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Technical Note. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, Vol. 18, Issue. 8, p. 705.


    Hanley, Claire J. Singh, Krish D. and McGonigle, David J. 2015. Transcranial modulation of brain oscillatory responses: A concurrent tDCS–MEG investigation. NeuroImage,


    Hanley, Claire J. Tommerdahl, Mark and McGonigle, David J. 2015. Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Vol. 9,


    Richard, Bruno Johnson, Aaron P. Thompson, Benjamin and Hansen, Bruce C. 2015. The Effects of tDCS Across the Spatial Frequencies and Orientations that Comprise the Contrast Sensitivity Function. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,


    Shin, Yong-Il Foerster, Águida and Nitsche, Michael A. 2015. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) – Application in neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 69, p. 154.


    Shin, Yong-Il Foerster, Águida and Nitsche, Michael A. 2015. Reprint of: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) – Application in neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 74, p. 74.


    Vaseghi, B. Zoghi, M. Jaberzadeh, S. and Thut, Gregor 2015. Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study. European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 42, Issue. 7, p. 2426.


    Chaieb, Leila Saiote, Catarina Paulus, Walter and Antal, Andrea 2014. The Stimulated Brain.


    Russell, Michael Goodman, Theodore Wang, Qiang Groshong, Bennett and Lyeth, Bruce G. 2014. Gender Differences in Current Received during Transcranial Electrical Stimulation. Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 5,


    Foerster, Águida Rocha, Sérgio Wiesiolek, Carine Chagas, Anna Paula Machado, Giselle Silva, Evelyn Fregni, Felipe and Monte-Silva, Katia 2013. Site-specific effects of mental practice combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 37, Issue. 5, p. 786.


    Kan, Benjamin Dundas, Jane E. and Nosaka, Kazunori 2013. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on elbow flexor maximal voluntary isometric strength and endurance. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, Vol. 38, Issue. 7, p. 734.


    Kidgell, Dawson J. Daly, Robin M. Young, Kayleigh Lum, Jarrod Tooley, Gregory Jaberzadeh, Shapour Zoghi, Maryam and Pearce, Alan J. 2013. Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity. Neural Plasticity, Vol. 2013, p. 1.


    Pirulli, Cornelia Fertonani, Anna and Miniussi, Carlo 2013. The Role of Timing in the Induction of Neuromodulation in Perceptual Learning by Transcranial Electric Stimulation. Brain Stimulation, Vol. 6, Issue. 4, p. 683.


    Plewnia, Christian Zwissler, Bastian Längst, Isabella Maurer, Brigitte Giel, Katrin and Krüger, Rejko 2013. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on executive functions: Influence of COMT Val/Met polymorphism. Cortex, Vol. 49, Issue. 7, p. 1801.


    Brunoni, Andre Russowsky Nitsche, Michael A. Bolognini, Nadia Bikson, Marom Wagner, Tim Merabet, Lotfi Edwards, Dylan J. Valero-Cabre, Antoni Rotenberg, Alexander Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Ferrucci, Roberta Priori, Alberto Boggio, Paulo Sergio and Fregni, Felipe 2012. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions. Brain Stimulation, Vol. 5, Issue. 3, p. 175.


    ×

Gender-specific modulation of short-term neuroplasticity in the visual cortex induced by transcranial direct current stimulation

  • LEILA CHAIEB (a1), ANDREA ANTAL (a1) and WALTER PAULUS (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523808080097
  • Published online: 01 February 2008
Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive method of modulating levels of cortical excitability. In this study, data gathered over a number of previously conducted experiments before and after tDCS, has been re-analyzed to investigate correlations between sex differences with respect to neuroplastic effects. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs), phosphene thresholds (PTs), and contrast sensitivity measurements (CSs) are used as indicators of the excitability of the primary visual cortex. The data revealed that cathodally induced excitability effects 10 min post stimulation with tDCS, showed no significant difference between genders. However, stimulation in the anodal direction revealed sex-specific effects: in women, anodal stimulation heightened cortical excitability significantly when compared to the age-matched male subject group. There was no significant difference between male and female subjects immediately after stimulation. These results indicate that sex differences exist within the visual cortex of humans, and may be subject to the influences of modulatory neurotransmitters or gonadal hormones which mirror short-term neuroplastic effects.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Leila Chaieb, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany. E-mail: leilachaieb@med.uni-goettingen.de
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Visual Neuroscience
  • ISSN: 0952-5238
  • EISSN: 1469-8714
  • URL: /core/journals/visual-neuroscience
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: