Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T15:59:39.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Independent visual threshold measurements in the two eyes of freely moving rats and mice using a virtual-reality optokinetic system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2005

R.M. DOUGLAS ,
N.M. ALAM ,
B.D. SILVER ,
T.J. MCGILL ,
W.W. TSCHETTER  and
G.T. PRUSKY
R.M. DOUGLAS
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Canadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, The University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
N.M. ALAM
Affiliation:
Canadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, The University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
B.D. SILVER
Affiliation:
Canadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, The University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
T.J. MCGILL
Affiliation:
Canadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, The University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
W.W. TSCHETTER
Affiliation:
Canadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, The University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
G.T. PRUSKY
Affiliation:
Canadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, The University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Slow horizontal head and body rotation occurs in mice and rats when the visual field is rotated around them, and these optomotor movements can be produced reliably in a virtual-reality system. If one eye is closed, only motion in the temporal-to-nasal direction for the contralateral eye evokes the tracking response. When the maximal spatial frequency capable of driving the response (“acuity”) was measured under monocular and binocular viewing conditions, the monocular acuity was identical to the binocular acuity measured with the same rotation direction. Thus, the visual capabilities of each eye can be measured under binocular conditions simply by changing the direction of rotation. Lesions of the visual cortex had no effect on the acuities measured with the virtual optokinetic system, whereas perceptual thresholds obtained previously with the Visual Water Task are. The optokinetic acuities were also consistently lower than acuity estimates from the Visual Water Task, but contrast sensitivities were the same or better. These data show that head-tracking in a virtual optokinetic drum is driven by subcortical, lower frequency, and contralateral pathways.

Keywords

OptomotorAcuityContrast sensitivityAccessory optic systemVisual cortex
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , September 2005 , pp. 677 - 684
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowden, W.F., Douglas, R.M., & Prusky, G.T. (2002). Horizontal bias in rat visual acuity. Program No. 260.18. 2002 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, Online.
Coffey, P.J., Girman, S., Wang, S.M., Hetherington, L., Keegan, D.J., Adamson, P., Greenwood, J., & Lund, R.D. (2002). Long-term preservation of cortically dependent visual function in RCS rats by transplantation. Nature Neuroscience 5(1), 53–56.Google Scholar
Cowey, A. & Franzini, C. (1979). The retinal origin of uncrossed optic nerve fibers in rats and their role in visual discrimination. Experimental Brain Research 35(3), 443–455.Google Scholar
Douglas, R.M., Alam, N.M., & Prusky, G.T. (2004). Enhancement of spatial vision in adult mice induced by monocular deprivation. Program No. 866.15. 2004 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2004. Online.
Fagiolini, M., Pizzorusso, T., Berardi, N., Domenici, L., & Maffie, L. (1994). Functional postnatal development of the rat primary visual cortex and the role of visual experience: Dark rearing and monocular deprivation. Vision Research 34, 709–720.Google Scholar
Franklin, K.B.J. & Paxinos, G. (1997). The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Giolli, R.A., Torigoe, Y., & Blanks, R.H. (1988). Nonretinal projections to the medial terminal accessory optic nucleus in rabbit and rat: A retrograde and anterograde transport study. Journal of Comparative Neurology 269(1), 73–86.Google Scholar
Gordon, J.A. & Stryker, M.I. (1996). Experience dependent plasticity of binocular responses in the primary visual cortex of the mouse. Journal of Neuroscience 16, 3274–3285.Google Scholar
Grusser-Cornehls, U. & Bohm, P. (1988). Horizontal optokinetic ocular nystagmus in wildtype (B6CBA+/+) and weaver mutant mice. Experimental Brain Research 72(1), 29–36.Google Scholar
Harvey, R.J., de'Sperati, C., & Strata, P. (1997). The early phase of horizontal optokinetic responses in the pigmented rat and the effects of lesions of the visual cortex. Vision Research 37(12), 1615–1625.Google Scholar
Hobbelen, J. & Collewijn, H. (1971). Effect of cerebro cortical and collicular ablations upon the optokinetic reactions in the rabbit. Documenta Ophthalmologica 30, 227–236.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. (1930). The mechanisms of vision: I. A method for rapid analysis of pattern vision in the rat. Journal of General Psychology 37, 453–460.Google Scholar
McGill, T.J., Douglas, R.M., Lund, R.D., & Prusky, G.T. (2004a). Quantification of spatial vision in the Royal College of Surgeons rat. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 45(3), 932–936.Google Scholar
McGill, T.J., Lund, R.D., Douglas, R.M., Wang, S., Lu, B., & Prusky, G.T. (2004b). Preservation of vision following cell-based therapies in a model of retinal degenerative disease. Vision Research 44(22), 2559–2566.Google Scholar
Miles, F.A. (1998). The neural processing of 3-D visual information: Evidence from eye movements. European Journal of Neuroscience 10(3), 811–822.Google Scholar
Neve, A.R., Prusky, G.T., & Douglas, R.M. (2002). Perception of motion coherence in rats. Program No. 353.17. 2002 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, Online.
Paxinos, G. & Watson, C. (1998). The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 4th edition. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Precht, W. & Cazin, L. (1979). Functional deficits in the optokinetic system of albino rats. Experimental Brain Research 37(1), 183–186.Google Scholar
Prusky, G.T., Alam, N.M., Beekman, S., & Douglas, R.M. (2004a). Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences 45(12), 4611–4616.Google Scholar
Prusky, G.T. & Douglas, R.M. (2003). Developmental plasticity of mouse visual acuity. European Journal of Neuroscience 17(1), 167–173.Google Scholar
Prusky, G.T. & Douglas, R.M. (2004). Characterization of mouse cortical spatial vision. Vision Research 44(8), 3411–3418.Google Scholar
Prusky, G.T., Douglas, R.M., Nelson, L., Shabanpoor, A., & Sutherland, R.J. (2004b). Visual memory task for rats reveals an essential role for hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 101(14), 5064–5068.Google Scholar
Prusky, G.T., Harker, K.T., Douglas, R.M., & Whishaw, I.Q. (2002). Variation in visual acuity within pigmented, and between pigmented and albino rat strains. Behavioral Brain Research 136(2), 339–348.Google Scholar
Prusky, G.T., West, P., & Douglas, R.M. (2000a). Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats. Vision Research 40(16), 2201–2209.Google Scholar
Prusky, G.T., West, P., & Douglas, R.M. (2000b). Reduced visual acuity impairs place but not cued learning in the Morris water task. Behavioral Brain Research 116, 135–140.Google Scholar
Prusky, G.T., West, P., & Douglas, R.M. (2000c). Experience-dependent plasticity of visual acuity in rats. European Journal of Neuroscience 12, 3781–3786.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., Schiff, D., & Bentivoglio, M. (1995). Independent efferent populations in the nucleus of the optic tract: An anatomical and physiological study in rat and cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 360(2), 271–285.Google Scholar
Schmucker, C., Seeliger, M., Humphries, P., Biel, M., & Schaeffel, F. (2005). Grating acuity at different luminances in wild-type mice and in mice lacking rod or cone function. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 46(1), 398–407.Google Scholar
Sefton, A.K. & Dreher, B. (1995). The visual system. In The Rat Nervous System, 2nd edition, ed. Paxinos, G., pp. xx–xx. New York: Academic Press.
Takada, M., Li, Z.K., & Hattori, T. (1987). Somatic labeling of the medial terminal nucleus of the accessory optic system with WGA-HRP injected into the rat occipital cortex. Brain Research Bulletin 18(1), 139–142.Google Scholar
Thomas, B.B., Seiler, M.J., Sadda, S.R., Coffey, P.J., & Aramant, R.B. (2004). Optokinetic test to evaluate visual acuity of each eye independently. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 138(1–2), 7–13.Google Scholar