Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 121
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Gilaie-Dotan, Sharon 2016. Visual motion serves but is not under the purview of the dorsal pathway. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 89, p. 378.

    Kerr-Gaffney, Jess E. Hunt, Amelia R. and Pilz, Karin S. 2016. Local form interference in biological motion perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, Vol. 78, Issue. 5, p. 1434.

    Murphy, Aidan P. Leopold, David A. Humphreys, Glyn W. and Welchman, Andrew E. 2016. Lesions to right posterior parietal cortex impair visual depth perception from disparity but not motion cues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 371, Issue. 1697, p. 20150263.

    Duchaine, Brad and Yovel, Galit 2015. A Revised Neural Framework for Face Processing. Annual Review of Vision Science, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 393.

    Gilaie-Dotan, Sharon Saygin, Ayse Pinar Lorenzi, Lauren J. Rees, Geraint and Behrmann, Marlene 2015. Ventral aspect of the visual form pathway is not critical for the perception of biological motion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue. 4, p. E361.

    Hadad, Batsheva Schwartz, Sivan Maurer, Daphne and Lewis, Terri L. 2015. Motion perception: a review of developmental changes and the role of early visual experience. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, Vol. 9,

    Lappe, Markus Wittinghofer, Karin and de Lussanet, Marc H. E. 2015. Perception of biological motion from size-invariant body representations. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, Vol. 9,

    Puce, A. Rossi, A. and Parada, F.J. 2015. Brain Mapping.

    Zhang, Yang Zhang, Li Neoh, Siew Chin Mistry, Kamlesh and Hossain, Mohammed Alamgir 2015. Intelligent affect regression for bodily expressions using hybrid particle swarm optimization and adaptive ensembles. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, Issue. 22, p. 8678.

    Zihl, Josef and Heywood, Charles A. 2015. The contribution of LM to the neuroscience of movement vision. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, Vol. 9,

    Hamm, Lisa M. Black, Joanna Dai, Shuan and Thompson, Benjamin 2014. Global processing in amblyopia: a review. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5,

    Main, Keith L. Pestilli, Franco Mezer, Aviv Yeatman, Jason Martin, Ryan Phipps, Stephanie and Wandell, Brian 2014. Speed discrimination predicts word but not pseudo-word reading rate in adults and children. Brain and Language, Vol. 138, p. 27.

    Pitcher, David Duchaine, Bradley and Walsh, Vincent 2014. Combined TMS and fMRI Reveal Dissociable Cortical Pathways for Dynamic and Static Face Perception. Current Biology, Vol. 24, Issue. 17, p. 2066.

    Rushton, Simon K. 2014. Spared Ability to Perceive Direction of Locomotor Heading and Scene-Relative Object Movement Despite Inability to Perceive Relative Motion. Medical Science Monitor, Vol. 20, p. 1563.

    Vaina, Lucia M. Soloviev, Sergei Calabro, Finnegan J. Buonanno, Ferdinando Passingham, Richard and Cowey, Alan 2014. Reorganization of Retinotopic Maps after Occipital Lobe Infarction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 26, Issue. 6, p. 1266.

    White, Nicole C. Fawcett, Jonathan M. and Newman, Aaron J. 2014. Electrophysiological markers of biological motion and human form recognition. NeuroImage, Vol. 84, p. 854.

    Gilaie-Dotan, S. Saygin, A. P. Lorenzi, L. J. Egan, R. Rees, G. and Behrmann, M. 2013. The role of human ventral visual cortex in motion perception. Brain, Vol. 136, Issue. 9, p. 2784.

    Kleinsmith, Andrea and Bianchi-Berthouze, Nadia 2013. Affective Body Expression Perception and Recognition: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 15.

    Grosbras, Marie-Hélène Beaton, Susan and Eickhoff, Simon B. 2012. Brain regions involved in human movement perception: A quantitative voxel-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 431.

    Hadad, Bat-Sheva Maurer, Daphne and Lewis, Terri L. 2012. Sparing of sensitivity to biological motion but not of global motion after early visual deprivation. Developmental Science, Vol. 15, Issue. 4, p. 474.


Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study

  • Lucia M. Vaina (a1) (a2), Marjorie Lemay (a3), Don C. Bienfang (a3), Albert Y. Choi (a1) and Ken Nakayama (a4)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 June 2009

A series of psychophysical tests examining early and later aspects of image-motion processing were conducted in a patient with bilateral lesions involving the posterior visual pathways, affecting the lateral parietal-temporal-occipital cortex and the underlying white matter (as shown by magnetic resonance imaging studies and confirmed by neuro-ophthalmological and neuropsychological examinations). Visual acuity, form discrimination, color, and contrast-sensitivity discrimination were normal whereas spatial localization, line bisection, depth, and binocular stereopsis were severely impaired. Performance on early motion tasks was very poor. These include seeing coherent motion in random noise (Newsome & Paré, 1988), speed discrimination, and seeing two-dimensional form from relative speed of motion. However, on higher-order motion tasks the patient was able to identify actions from the evolving pattern of dots placed at the joints of a human actor (Johansson, 1973) as well as discriminating three-dimensional structure of a cylinder from motion in a dynamic random-dot field. The pattern of these results is at odds with the hypothesis that precise metrical comparison of early motion measurements is necessary for higher-order “structure from motion” tasks.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

E.H. Adelson & J.A. Movshon (1985). Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature 300, 523525.

C.L. Baker & O.J. Braddick (1982). The basis of area and dot number effects in random dot motion perception. Vision Research 22, 12531260.

C.L. Baker & O.J. Braddick (1984). Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception. Vision Research 25, 803812.

O.J. Braddick (1974). A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research 14, 519527.

G. Holmes (1918). Disturbances of visual orientation. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2, 449468.

G. Holmes & G. Horax (1919). Disturbances of spatial orientation and visual attention, with loss of stereoscopic vision. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 1, 385407.

H.J. Howard (1919). A test for judgement of distance. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2, 656675.

G. Johansson (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 14, 201211.

J.J. Koenderinck & A.J. van Doorn (1986). Depth and shape from differential perspective in the presence of bending deformations. Journal of Optical Society of America A 3, 242249.

L.T. Kozlowski & J.E. Cutting (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics 21, 571580.

D.T. Lawton (1983). Processing translational motion sequences. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processings 22, 116144.

H.C. Longuet-Higgins & K. Prazdny (1980). The interpretation of moving retinal images. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 208, 385397.

J.M. Loomis & D.M. Eby (1989). Relative motion parallax and the perception of structure from motion. In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion, Irvine, California, pp. 204211.

K. Nakayama & C.W. Tyler (1981). Psychophysical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues. Vision Research 21, 427433.

W.T. Newsome , K.H. Britten & J.A. Movshon (1989). Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision. Nature 341, 5254.

D. Perrett , A. Chitty , A. Mistlin & M. Harries (1985). Visual cells sensitive to biological motion. Behavioral Brain Research 16, 153170.

R.M. Siegel & R.A. Anderson (1988). Perception of three-dimensional structure from motion in monkey and man. Nature 331, 259261.

S. Ullman (1984). Maximizing rigidity: the incremental recovery of 3-D structure from rigid and rubbery motion. Perception 13, 255274.

L.M. Vaina (1987). Visual texture for recognition. In Matters of Intelligence, ed. L.M. Vaina , pp. 89115. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Press.

L.M. Vaina (1989). Selective deficits of visual motion interpretation in patients with right occipito-parietal lesions. Biological Cybernetics 61, 113.

A. van Meeteren & H.B. Barlow (1981). The statistical efficiency for detecting sinusoidal modulation at average dot density in random figures. Vision Research 21, 765778.

E.K. Warrington & A. Taylor (1973). The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. Cortex 9, 152164.

E.K. Warrington & M. James (1988). Visual apperceptive agnosia:a clinico-anatomical study of three cases. Cortex 24, 1332.

D. Williams , G. Phillips & R. Sekuler (1986). Hysteresis in the perception of motion direction as evidence for neural cooperativity. Nature 324, 253255.

S.M. Zeki (1974). Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of rhesus monkey. Journal of Physiology 236, 547573.

J. Zihl , D. Von Cramon & N. Mai (1983). Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. Brain 106, 313340.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Visual Neuroscience
  • ISSN: 0952-5238
  • EISSN: 1469-8714
  • URL: /core/journals/visual-neuroscience
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *