Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T03:58:50.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Luminance-dependent hue shift in protanopes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2005

DAVID L. BIMLER
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Human Development, Massey University, New Zealand
GALINA V. PARAMEI
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Germany

Abstract

For normal trichromats, the hue of a light can change as its luminance varies. This Bezold-Brücke (B-B) hue shift is commonly attributed to nonlinearity in the blue–yellow opponent system. In the present study, we questioned whether protanopes experience analogous changes. Two protanopes (Ps) viewed spectral lights at six luminance levels across three log steps. Two normal trichromats (NTs) were tested for comparison. A variant of the color-naming method was used, with an additional “white” term. To overcome the difficulty of Ps' idiosyncratic color naming, we converted color-naming functions into individual color spaces, by way of interstimulus similarities and multidimensional scaling (MDS). The color spaces describe each stimulus in terms of spatial coordinates, so that hue shifts are measured geometrically, as displacements along specific dimensions. For the NTs, a B-B shift derived through MDS agreed well with values obtained directly by matching color-naming functions. A change in color appearance was also observed for the Ps, distinct from that in perceived brightness. This change was about twice as large as the B-B shift for NTs and combined what the latter would distinguish as hue and saturation shifts. The protanopic analogue of the B-B shift indicates that the blue–yellow nonlinearity persists in the absence of a red–green signal. In addition, at mesopic levels (≤ 38 td), the Ps' MDS solution was two dimensional at longer wavelengths, suggesting rod input. Conversely, at higher luminance levels (76 td–760 td) the MDS solution was essentially one dimensional, placing a lower limit on S-cone input at longer wavelengths.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramov, I., Gordon, J., Akilov, V., Babiy, M., Bakis, G., Ilyusha, S., Khamermesh, K., & Vayner, A. (1997). Color appearance: Singing the Russian blues. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 38, S899.Google Scholar
Boynton, R.M. & Gordon, J. (1965). Bezold-Brücke hue shift measured by color-naming technique. Journal of the Optical Society of America 55, 7886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, S.L., Knight, R., & Bechtold, J. (2000). Opponent-color models and the influence of rod signals on the loci of unique hues. Vision Research 40, 33333344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J. & Abramov, I. (1988). Scaling procedures for specifying color appearance. Color Research and Application 13, 146152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurvich, L.M. (1981). Color Vision. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
Izmailov, Ch.A. & Sokolov, E.N. (1991). Spherical model of color and brightness discrimination. Psychological Science 2, 249259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J.B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 28, 127.Google Scholar
Larimer, J., Krantz, D.H., & Cicerone, C.M. (1975). Opponent-process additivity: II. Yellow/blue equilibria and nonlinear models. Vision Research 15, 723731.Google Scholar
McMahon, M.J. & MacLeod, D.I.A. (1998). Dichromatic color vision at very high light levels: Red/green discrimination using the blue-sensitive mechanisms. Vision Research 38, 973983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paramei, G.V., Bimler, D.L., & Cavonius, C.R. (1998). Effects of luminance on color perception of protanopes. Vision Research 38, 33973401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paramei, G.V. & Cavonius, C.R. (1997). Color naming in dizygotic twin protanopes at different luminance levels. In AIC Color 97. Proceedings of the 8th Congress of the International Colour Association, Vol. I, pp. 335338. Kyoto, Japan: The Color Science Association of Japan.
Purdy, D.M. (1937). The Bezold-Brücke phenomenon and contours for constant hue. American Journal of Psychology 49, 313315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabkin, E.B. (1971). [Pseudoisochromatic Plates for diagnostics of color sensitivity] (in Russian). Moscow: Meditsina.
Rautian, G.N. (1957). [A new anomaloscope] (in Russian). Biofizika 2, 734742.Google Scholar
Scheibner, H.M.O. & Boynton, R.M. (1968). Residual red–green discrimination in dichromats. Journal of the Optical Society of America 58, 11511158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R.N. & Carroll, J.D. (1966). Parametric representation of nonlinear data structures. In Multivariate Analysis, ed. Krishnaiah, P.R., pp. 561592. New York: Academic Press.
Werner, J.S. & Wooten, B.R. (1979). Opponent chromatic mechanisms: Relation to photopigments and hue naming. Journal of the Optical Society of America 69, 422434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar