Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Shaqiri, Albulena Willemin, Julie Sierro, Guillaume Roinishvili, Maya Iannantuoni, Luisa Rürup, Linda Chkonia, Eka Herzog, Michael H. and Mohr, Christine 2015. Does chronic nicotine consumption influence visual backward masking in schizophrenia and schizotypy?. Schizophrenia Research: Cognition, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 93.

    Bhattacharyya, Anwesha Veit, Julia Kretz, Robert Bondar, Igor and Rainer, Gregor 2013. Basal forebrain activation controls contrast sensitivity in primary visual cortex. BMC Neuroscience, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 55.

    Bhattacharyya, Anwesha Bießmann, Felix Veit, Julia Kretz, Robert and Rainer, Gregor 2012. Functional and laminar dissociations between muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic neuromodulation in the tree shrew primary visual cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 35, Issue. 8, p. 1270.

    Brown, Harriet R. and Friston, Karl J. 2012. Dynamic causal modelling of precision and synaptic gain in visual perception — an EEG study. NeuroImage, Vol. 63, Issue. 1, p. 223.

    Smith, Andrew T. 1996. Contrast discrimination: A model and a hypothesis concerning the role of cholinergic modulation in contrast perception. Visual Neuroscience, Vol. 13, Issue. 05, p. 873.


Pharmacological separation of mechanisms contributing to human contrast sensitivity

  • A. T. Smith (a1) and C. M. Baker-Short (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 June 2009

Two basic types of cholinergic receptor have been identified in nervous systems: nicotinic and muscarinic. In the mammalian visual system, the balance of evidence suggests that nicotinic activity is associated primarily with transmission and processing of information while muscarinic activity reflects modulatory influences arising in the brainstem and basal forebrain. We have measured contrast sensitivity functions using a two-alternative forced-choice procedure in young human volunteers with and without administration of nicotine (1.5 mg by buccal absorption) or the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (1.2 mg orally). Scopolamine elevates contrast-detection thresholds uniformly at all spatial frequencies, consistent with blocking of a nonspecific arousal system. Nicotine, in contrast, improves sensitivity at low spatial frequencies (below about 4 cycle/deg); at higher spatial frequencies sensitivity is, if anything, impaired. Using counterphase gratings, we find that scopolamine elevates thresholds uniformly at all temporal frequencies. Nicotine lowers thresholds at high but not low temporal frequencies. The results obtained with nicotine suggest that contrast sensitivity reflects the activity of two mechanisms, or sets of spatiotemporal filters, that are pharmacologically distinct, the contrast sensitivity function reflecting the envelope of their sensitivities.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S.J. Anderson & D.C. Burr (1985). Spatial and temporal selectivity of the human motion detection system. Vision Research 25, 11471154.

M. Ariel & N.W. Daw (1982). Effects of cholinergic drugs on receptive-field properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology (London) 324, 135160.

P. Broks , G.C. Preston , M. Traub , P. Poppleton , C. Ward & S.M. Stahl (1988). Modelling dementia: Effects of scopolamine on memory and attention. Neuropsychologia 26, 685700.

N. Denny , T.E. Frumkes , M.C. Barris & T. Eysteinsson (1991). Tonic interocular suppression and binocular summation in human vision. Journal of Physiology (London) 437, 449460.

E.A. DeYoe & D.C. Van Essen (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience 11, 219226.

A. Dolabela De Lima & W. Singer (1987). The brain-stem projection to the lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat: Identification of cholinergic and monoamine elements. Journal of Comparative Neurology 259, 92121.

E.V. Famiglietti (1983). ‘Starburst’ amacrine cells and cholinergic neurons: Mirror-symmetric ON and OFF amacrine cells of rabbit retina. Brain Research 261, 138144.

H. IkedA & M.J. Sheardown (1982). Acetylcholine may be an excitatory transmitter mediating visual excitation of ‘transient’ cells with the periphery effect in the cat retina: Iontophoretic studies in vivo. Neuroscience 7, 12991308.

E. Kaplan & R.M. Shapley (1982). X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. Journal of Physiology (London) 330, 125143.

A.P. Mariani & L.B. Hersh (1988). Synaptic organization of cholinergic amacrine cells in the rhesus monkey retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 267, 269280.

D. McCormick & D.A. Prince (1987). Actions of acetylcholine in the guinea pig and cat medial and lateral geniculate nuclei, in vitro. Journal of Physiology (London) 392, 147165.

B. Moulden , J. Renshaw & G. Mather (1984). Two channels for flicker in the human visual system. Perception 13, 387400.

C.M. Müller & W. Singer (1989). Acetylcholine-induced inhibition in the cat visual cortex is mediated by a GABAergic mechanism. Brain Research 487, 335342.

P.C. Murphy & A.M. Sillito (1991). Cholinergic enhancement of direction selectivity in the visual cortex of the cat. Neuroscience 40, 1320.

D. Parkinson , K.E. Kratz & N.W. Daw (1988). Evidence for a nic-otinic component to the actions of acetylcholine in cat visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research 73, 553568.

R.G. Pourcho & K. Osman (1986). Cytochemical identification of cholinergic amacrine cells in cat retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 247, 497504.

G.T. Prusky , C. Shaw & M.S. Cynader (1987). Nicotine receptors are located on lateral geniculate nucleus terminals in cat visual cortex. Brain Research 412, 131138.

G.T. Prusky , C. Shaw & M.S. Cynader (1988). The distribution and ontogenesis of [3H]nicotine binding sites in cat visual cortex. Developmental Brain Research 39, 161176.

M.N. Rossor , L.L. Iversen , G.P. Reynolds , Q.C. Mountjoy & M. Roth (1984). Neurochemical characteristics of early and late onset types of Alzheimer's Disease. British Medical Journal 288, 961964.

R. Shapley & V.H. Perry (1986). Cat and monkey retinal ganglion cells and their visual functional roles. Trends in Neuroscience 9, 229235.

A.M. Sillito & J.A. Kemp (1983). Cholinergic modulation of the functional organization of the cat visual cortex. Brain Research 289, 143155.

A.M. Sillito , J.A. Kemp & N. Berardi (1983). The cholinergic influence on the function of the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN). Brain Research 280, 299307.

A.T. Smith , F. Early & G.H. Jones (1990). Comparison of the effects of Alzheimer's disease, normal aging, and scopolamine on human transient visual evoked potentials. Psychopharmacology 102, 535543.

C.C. Stichel & W. Singer (1987). Quantitative analysis of the cho-line acetyltransferase-immunoreactive axonal network in the cat primary visual cortex: 1. Adult cats. Journal of Comparative Neurology 258, 9198.

M.M. Taylor & C.D. Creelman (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 41, 782787.

K. Wesnes & D.M. Warburton (1984). Effects of scopolamine and nicotine on human rapid information processing. Psychopharmacology 82, 147150.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Visual Neuroscience
  • ISSN: 0952-5238
  • EISSN: 1469-8714
  • URL: /core/journals/visual-neuroscience
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *