Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
Home
Article
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Cited by 17
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Dudea, Diana Gasparik, Cristina Botos, Alexandra Alb, Florin Irimie, Ada and Paravina, Rade D. 2016. Influence of background/surrounding area on accuracy of visual color matching. Clinical Oral Investigations, Vol. 20, Issue. 6, p. 1167.

    Gómez-Polo, Cristina Muñoz, María Portillo Lorenzo Luengo, Mari Cruz Vicente, Purificación Galindo, Purificanción and Martín Casado, Ana María 2016. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 115, Issue. 1, p. 65.

    Yang, Fan and Li, Cong 2016. The color of gender stereotyping: The congruity effect of topic, color, and gender on health messages’ persuasiveness in cyberspace. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 64, p. 299.

    Zhaoping, Li and Carroll, Joseph 2016. An analytical model of the influence of cone sensitivity and numerosity on the Rayleigh match. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. A228.

    da Silva, Maria Aparecida Anfe, Taciana Emília de Almeida Matos, Adriana Bona and Vieira, Glauco Fioranelli 2015. Influence of Gender, Anxiety and Depression Symptoms, and Use of Oral Contraceptive in Color Perception. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Vol. 27, p. S74.

    de Vries, Geert J. and Forger, Nancy G. 2015. Sex differences in the brain: a whole body perspective. Biology of Sex Differences, Vol. 6, Issue. 1,

    Dees, Elise W. Gilson, Stuart J. Neitz, Maureen and Baraas, Rigmor C. 2015. The influence of L-opsin gene polymorphisms and neural ageing on spatio-chromatic contrast sensitivity in 20–71year olds. Vision Research, Vol. 116, p. 13.

    Handa, Robert J. and McGivern, Robert F. 2015. Steroid Hormones, Receptors, and Perceptual and Cognitive Sex Differences in the Visual System. Current Eye Research, Vol. 40, Issue. 2, p. 110.

    Dees, Elise W. and Baraas, Rigmor C. 2014. Performance of normal females and carriers of color-vision deficiencies on standard color-vision tests. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. A401.

    Hashmi, Javeria A. and Davis, Karen D. 2014. Deconstructing sex differences in pain sensitivity. Pain, Vol. 155, Issue. 1, p. 10.

    Mylonas, Dimitris Paramei, Galina V. and MacDonald, Lindsay 2014. Colour Studies.

    Eliot, Lise 2013. Single-Sex Education and the Brain. Sex Roles, Vol. 69, Issue. 7-8, p. 363.

    Birch, Jennifer 2012. Worldwide prevalence of red-green color deficiency. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 313.

    Doty, Richard L. and Cameron, E. Leslie 2009. Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 97, Issue. 2, p. 213.

    Haddad, Helene J. Jakstat, Holger A. Arnetzl, Gerwin Borbely, Judit Vichi, Alessandro Dumfahrt, Herbert Renault, Patrick Corcodel, Nicoleta Pohlen, Bostjan Marada, Gyula de Parga, Juan A. Martinez Vazquez Reshad, Mamaly Klinke, Thomas U. Hannak, Wolfgang B. and Paravina, Rade D. 2009. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?. Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 37, p. e40.

    Hashmi, Javeria A. and Davis, Karen D. 2009. Women experience greater heat pain adaptation and habituation than men. Pain, Vol. 145, Issue. 3, p. 350.

    Nogueira, M. I. Abbas, S. Y. Campos, L. G. M. Allemandi, W. Lawson, P. Takada, S. H. and Azmitia, E. C. 2009. S100β Protein Expression: Gender- and Age-Related Daily Changes. Neurochemical Research, Vol. 34, Issue. 8, p. 1355.

    ×
  • Get access
    Add to cart $35.00
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register Recommend to librarian

Sex-related differences in chromatic sensitivity

  • M. RODRÍGUEZ-CARMONA (a1), L.T. SHARPE (a1) (a2), J.A. HARLOW (a1) and J.L. BARBUR (a1)
Abstract

Generally women are believed to be more discriminating than men in the use of color names and this is often taken to imply superior color vision. However, if both X-chromosome linked color deficient males (∼8%) and females (<1%) as well as heterozygote female carriers (∼15%) are excluded from comparisons, then differences between men and women in red-green (RG) color discrimination have been reported as not being significant (e.g., Pickford, 1944; Hood et al., 2006). We re-examined this question by assessing the performance of 150 males and 150 females on the color assessment and diagnosis (CAD) test (Rodriguez-Carmona et al., 2005). This is a sensitive test that yields small color detection thresholds. The test employs direction-specific, moving, chromatic stimuli embedded in a background of random, dynamic, luminance contrast noise. A four-alternative, forced-choice procedure is employed to measure the subject's thresholds for detection of color signals in 16 directions in color space, while ensuring that the subject cannot make use of any residual luminance contrast signals. In addition, we measured the Rayleigh anomaloscope matches in a subgroup of 111 males and 114 females. All the age-matched males (30.8 ± 9.7) and females (26.7 ± 8.8) had normal color vision as diagnosed by a battery of conventional color vision tests. Females with known color deficient relatives were excluded from the study. Comparisons between the male and female groups revealed no significant differences in anomaloscope midpoints (p = 0.709), but a significant difference in matching ranges (p = 0.040); females on average tended to have a larger mean range (4.11) than males (3.75). Females also had significantly higher CAD thresholds than males along the RG (p = 0.0004), but not along the yellow-blue (YB) discrimination axis. The differences between males and females in RG discrimination may be related to the heterozygosity in X-linked cone photo pigment expression common among females.

Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © Cambridge University Press 2008
Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Marisa Rodriguez-Carmona, Applied Vision Research Centre, The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Sciences, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK. E-mail: m.l.rodriguez-carmona@city.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

W.R. Anyan Jr. & W.W.I. Quillian (1971). The naming of primary colors by children. Child Development 42, 1629–1632.
A.B. Asenjo , J. Rim & D.D. Oprian (1994). Molecular determinants of human red/green color discrimination. Neuron 12, 1131–1138.
J.L. Barbur (2003). Understanding colour-normal and defective colour vision. Trends in Cognitive Science 7, 434–436.
J.L. Barbur (2004). “Double-blindsight” revealed through the processing of color and luminance contrast defined motion signals. Progress in Brain Research 144, 243–259.
J.L. Barbur , A.J. Harlow & G.T. Plant (1994). Insights into the different exploits of colour in the visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 258, 327–334.
D.L. Bimler & J. Kirkland (2002). Sex differences in color vision and the salience of color space axes. Journal of Vision 2, 28a.
D.L. Bimler , J. Kirkland & K.A. Jameson (2004). Quantifying variations in personal color spaces: Are there sex differences in color vision? Color Research and Application 29, 128–134.
J. Birch , A. Young & S. David (1991). Variations in normal trichromatism. In Colour Vision Deficiencies X, ed. B. Drum , J.D. Moreland & A. Serra , pp. 267–272. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
J. Carroll , C. McMahon , M. Neitz & J. Neitz (2000). Flicker-photometric electroretinogram estimates of L:M cone photoreceptor ratio in men with photopigment spectra derived from genetics. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision 17, 499–509.
H. De Vries (1948). The heredity of the relative numbers of red and green receptors in the human eye. Genetica 24, 199–212.
N.L. Furbee , K. Maynard , J.J. Smith , B.A. Benfer Jr., S. Quick & L. Ross (1997). The emergence of color cognition from color perception. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 6, 223–240.
S.M. Hood , J.D. Mollon , L. Purves & G. Jordan (2006). Color discrimination in carriers of color deficiency. Vision Research 46, 2894–2900.
A.C. Hurlbert & Y. Ling (2007). Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Currents in Biology 17, R623–R625.
K.A. Jameson , S.M. Highnote & L.M. Wasserman (2001). Richer color experience in observers with multiple photopigment opsin genes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 244–261.
G. Jordan & J.D. Mollon (1993). A study of women heterozygous for colour deficiencies. Vision Research 33, 1495–1508.
R.G. Kuehni (2001). Determination of unique hues using Munsell color chips. Color Research and Application 26, 61–66.
J. Nathans , S.L. Merbs , C.H. Sung , C.J. Weitz & Y. Wang (1992). Molecular genetics of human visual pigments. Annual Review of Genetics 26, 403–424.
J. Neitz & G.H. Jacobs (1986). Polymorphism of the long-wavelength cone in normal human colour vision. Nature 323, 623–625.
J. Neitz , M. Neitz , J.C. He & S.K. Shevell (1999). Trichromatic color vision with only two spectrally distinct photopigments. Nature Neuroscience 2, 884–888.
J. Neitz , M. Neitz & G.H. Jacobs (1993). More than three different cone pigments among people with normal color vision. Vision Research 33, 117–122.
J. Neitz , M. Neitz & P.M. Kainz (1996). Visual pigment gene structure and the severity of color vision defects. Science 274, 801–804.
M. Neitz , J. Neitz & G.H. Jacobs (1991). Spectral tuning of pigments underlying red-green color vision. Science 252, 971–974.
P.J. Pardo , A.L. Perez & M.I. Suero (2007). An example of sex-linked color vision differences. Color Research & Application 32, 433–439.
J. Perez-Carpinell , R. Baldovi , M.D. de Fez & J. Castro (1998). Color memory matching: Time effect and other factors. Color Research & Application 23, 234–247.
R.W. Pickford (1944). Women with colour-blind relatives. Nature 153, 409.
R.W. Pickford (1947). Sex differences in colour vision. Nature 159, 606–607.
L.T. Reynolds (1966). A note on the perpetuation of a “scientific” fiction. Sociometry 29, 85–88.
M. Saito (1996). A comparative study of color preferences in Japan, China and Indonesia with emphasis on the preference for white. Perception and Motor Skills 83, 115–128.
M. Saito (1999). Blue and seven phenomena among Japanese students. Perception and Motor Skills 89, 532–536.
E. Sanocki , S.K. Shevell & J. Winderickx (1994). Serine/alanine amino acid polymorphism of the L-cone photopigment assessed by dual Rayleigh-type color matches. Vision Research 34, 377–382.
S. Swaringen , S. Layman & A. Wilson (1978). Sex-differences in color naming. Perceptual and Motor Skills 47, 440–442.
L.L. Thomas , A.T. Curtis & R. Bolton (1978). Sex-differences in elicited color lexicon size. Perceptual and Motor Skills 47, 77–78.
P.E. Vernon & A. Straker (1943). Distribution of colour blind men in Great Britain. Nature 152, 690.
M. Vorobyev (2004). Ecology and evolution of primate colour vision. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 87, 230–238.
J. Winderickx , D.T. Lindsey , E. Sanocki , D.Y. Teller , A.G. Motulsky & S.S. Deeb (1992). Polymorphism in red photopigment underlies variation in colour matching. Nature 356, 431–433.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Visual Neuroscience
  • ISSN: 0952-5238
  • EISSN: 1469-8714
  • URL: /core/journals/visual-neuroscience
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 41 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 268 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Cancel
Confirm
×