Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Stimulus size and intensity alter fundamental receptive-field properties of mouse retinal ganglion cells in vivo

  • BOTIR T. SAGDULLAEV (a1) (a2) and MAUREEN A. MCCALL (a1)
Abstract

The receptive field (RF) of most retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is comprised of an excitatory center and an antagonistic surround. Interactions between these RF elements shape most of the visual responses of RGCs. To begin to investigate center-surround interactions of mouse RGCs quantitatively, we characterized their responses in an in vivo preparation to a variety of spot and full-field stimuli. When RGCs were stimulated with a spot that matched the cell's RF center diameter (optimal spot), all RGCs could be categorized as either ON- or OFF-center. In all RGCs, full-field stimulation significantly reduced both the peak and the mean firing rates evoked with an optimal spot stimulus. Full-field stimulation revealed differences in other response properties between ON- and OFF-center RGCs. With a full-field stimulus, the duration of the OFF-center RGCs response was reduced making them more transient, while the duration of the ON-center RGCs increased making them more sustained. Of most interest, full-field stimulation altered the RF center response sign in approximately half of the OFF-center RGCs, which became either OFF/ON or ON only. In contrast, all ON-center and the other OFF-center cells conserved their RF response sign in the presence of the full-field stimulus. We propose that sign-altering OFF-center RGCs possess an additional RF surround mechanism that underlies this alteration in their response. Of general interest these results suggest that the sole use of full-field stimulation to categorize visual response properties of RGCs does not adequately reflect their RF organization and, therefore, is not an optimal strategy for their classification.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Maureen A. McCall, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA. E-mail: mo.mccall@louisville.edu
References
Hide All

REFERENCES

Artal, P., Herreros de Tejada, P., Munoz Tedo, C., & Green, D.G. (1998). Retinal image quality in the rodent eye. Visual Neuroscience 15, 597605.
Balkema, G.W., Jr. & Pinto, L.H. (1982). Electrophysiology of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse: A study of a normally pigmented mouse and a congenic hypopigmentation mutant, pearl. Journal of Neurophysiology 48, 968980.
Barlow, H.B. (1953). Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. Journal of Physiology 119, 6988.
Barlow, H.B., Fitzhugh, R., & Kuffler, S.W. (1957). Change of organisation in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation. Journal of Physiology 137, 338354.
Barlow, H.B. & Levick, W.R. (1969). Coding of light intensity by the cat retina. Processing of Optical Data XLIII, 383396.
Belgum, J.H., Dvorak, D.R., McReynolds, J.S., & Miyachi, E. (1987). Push-pull effect of surround illumination on excitatory and inhibitory inputs to mudpuppy retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology 388, 233243.
Bloomfield, S.A. & Dacheux, R.F. (2001). Rod vision: Pathways and processing in the mammalian retina. Progress in Retinal Eye Research 20, 351384.
Caldwell, J.H. & Daw, N.W. (1978). New properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology 276, 257276.
Cleland, B.G., Levick, W.R., & Sanderson, K.J. (1973). Properties of sustained and transient ganglion cells in the cat retina. Journal of Physiology 228, 649680.
Cook, P.B. & McReynolds, J.S. (1998). Lateral inhibition in the inner retina is important for spatial tuning of ganglion cells. Nature Neuroscience 1, 714719.
De Monasterio, F.M. & Gouras, P. (1975). Functional properties of ganglion cells of the rhesus monkey retina. Journal of Physiology 251, 167195.
Enroth-Cugell, C. & Lennie, P. (1975). The control of retinal ganglion cell discharge by receptive field surrounds. Journal of Physiology 247, 551578.
Enroth-Cugell, C., Lennie, P., & Shapley, R.M. (1975). Surround contribution to light adaptation in cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology 247, 579588.
Enroth-Cugell, C. & Pinto, L.H. (1972a). Properties of the surround response mechanism of cat retinal ganglion cells and centre-surround interaction. Journal of Physiology 220, 403439.
Enroth-Cugell, C. & Pinto, L.H. (1972b). Pure central responses from off-centre cells and pure surround responses from on-centre cells. Journal of Physiology 220, 441464.
Enroth-Cugell, C. & Robson, J.G. (1966). The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. Journal of Physiology 187, 517552.
Flores-Herr, N., Protti, D.A., & Wassle, H. (2001). Synaptic currents generating the inhibitory surround of ganglion cells in the mammalian retina. Journal of Neuroscience 21, 48524863.
Hammond, P. (1974). Cat retinal ganglion cells: size and shape of receptive field centres. Journal of Physiology 242(1), 99118.
Hubel, D.H. (1957). Tungsten microelectrode for recording from single units. Science 125, 549550.
Jeon, C.J., Strettoi, E., & Masland, R.H. (1998). The major cell populations of the mouse retina. Journal of Neuroscience 18(21), 89368946.
Koch, K., McLean, J., Berry, M., Sterling, P., Balasubramanian, V., & Freed, M.A. (2004). Efficiency of information transmission by retinal ganglion cells. Current Biology 14, 15231530.
Kuffler, S.W. (1953). Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 16, 3768.
Lin, B., Wang, S.W., & Masland, R.H. (2004). Retinal ganglion cell type, size, and spacing can be specified independent of homotypic dendritic contacts. Neuron 43, 475485.
Linsenmeier, R.A., Frishman, L.J., Jakiela, H.G., & Enroth-Cugell, C. (1982). Receptive field properties of x and y cells in the cat retina derived from contrast sensitivity measurements. Vision Research 22, 11731183.
Mangel, S.C. (1991). Analysis of the horizontal cell contributions to the receptive field surround of ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. Journal of Physiology 442, 211234.
McCall, M.A. & Sagdullaev, B.T. (2003). GABAC receptor-mediated inhibition shapes retinal ganglion cell visual responses. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 44, E-Abstract 3235.
Merwine, D.K., Amthor, F.R., & Grzywacz, N.M. (1995). Interaction between center and surround in rabbit retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 73, 15471567.
Morigiwa, K., Tauchi, M., & Fukuda, Y. (1989). Fractal analysis of ganglion cell dendritic branching patterns of the rat and cat retinae. Neuroscience Research (Suppl.) 10, S131139.
Muller, J.F. & Dacheux, R.F. (1997). Alpha ganglion cells of the rabbit retina lose antagonistic surround responses under dark adaptation. Visual Neuroscience 14, 395401.
Nirenberg, S. & Meister, M. (1997). The light response of retinal ganglion cells is truncated by a displaced amacrine circuit. Neuron 18, 637650.
Norton, T.T. & Casagrande, V.A. (1982). Laminar organization of receptive-field properties in lateral geniculate nucleus of bush baby (Galago crassicaudatus). Journal of Neurophysiology 47, 715741.
Peichel, L., Buhl, E.H., & Boycott, B.B. (1987). Alpha ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 263(1), 2541.
Porciatti, V., Pizzorusso, T., & Maffei, L. (1999). The visual physiology of the wild type mouse determined with pattern VEPs. Vision Research 39, 30713081.
Rodieck, R.W. (1965). Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Research 5, 583601.
Rodieck, R.W. & Stone, J. (1965). Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 28, 832849.
Sagdullaev, B.T., DeMarco, P.J., & McCall, M.A. (2004). Improved contact lens electrode for corneal ERG recordings in mice. Documenta Ophthalmologica 108, 181184.
Schmucker, C. & Schaeffel, F. (2004). In vivo biometry in the mouse eye with low coherence interferometry. Vision Research 44, 24452456.
Sinclair, J.R., Jacobs, A.L., & Nirenberg, S. (2004). Selective ablation of a class of amacrine cells alters spatial processing in the retina. Journal of Neuroscience 24, 14591467.
Stone, C. & Pinto, L. (1993). Response properties of ganglion cells in the isolated mouse retina. Visual Neuroscience 10, 3139.
Sun, W., Li, N., & He, S. (2002). Large-scale morphological survey of mouse retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Comparative Neurology 451, 115126.
Taylor, W.R. (1999). TTX attenuates surround inhibition in rabbit retinal ganglion cells. Visual Neuroscience 16, 285290.
Vaney, D.I., Levick, W.R., & Thibos, L.N. (1981). Rabbit retinal ganglion cells. Receptive field classification and axonal conduction properties. Experimental Brain Research 44, 2733.
Weber, A.J., McCall, M.A., & Stanford, L.R. (1991). Synaptic inputs to physiologically identified retinal X-cells in the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 314, 350366.
Werblin, F.S. & Dowling, J.E. (1969). Organization of the retina of mudpuppy, Necuturus maculosis. II. Intracellular recording. Journal of Neurophysiology 32, 339355.
Woch, G., Aramant, R.B., Seiler, M.J., Sagdullaev, B.T., & McCall, M.A. (2001). Retinal transplants restore visually evoked responses in rats with photoreceptor degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 42, 16691676.
Zaghloul, K.A., Boahen, K., & Demb, J.B. (2003). Different circuits for ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells cause different contrast sensitivities. Journal of Neuroscience 23, 26452654.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Visual Neuroscience
  • ISSN: 0952-5238
  • EISSN: 1469-8714
  • URL: /core/journals/visual-neuroscience
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed