Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T05:36:15.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relation of Structural Configuration to the Herbicidal Properties and Phytotoxicity of Several Carbamates and Other Chemicals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. S. Shaw  and
C. R. Swanson
W. S. Shaw
Affiliation:
Division of Weed Investigations, Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural Engineering, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
C. R. Swanson
Affiliation:
Division of Weed Investigations, Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural Engineering, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
Get access

Extract

The discovery of the herbicidal properties of isopropyl N-phenylcarbamate (IPC) and isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate (CIPC) and other organic chemicals has created an impetus in the development of new herbicides. Since the discovery of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), considerable effort has been devoted to the development of herbicides that are as effective and selective for the control of annual grasses as is 2,4-D for the control of many broad-leaved weeds.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1953 , pp. 43 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © 1953 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Allard, R. W., Ennis, W. B. Jr., De Rose, H. R., and Weaver, R. J. The action of isopropyl phenyl carbamate upon plants. Bot. Gaz. 107: 589–596. 1946.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, W. P., Linder, Paul J., and Mitchell, John W. Evaporation of some plant growth regulators and its possible effect on their activity. Science, 116: 502–503. 1952.Google Scholar
3. De Rose, H. R. Crabgrass inhibition with O-isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)-carbamate. Agron. Jour. 43: 139–143. 1951.Google Scholar
4. Emerson, R. A. The inheritance of certain forms of chlorophyll reduction in corn leaves. Nebr. Agri. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rpt. 25: 89–105. 1912.Google Scholar
5. Ennis, W. B. Jr. Some effects of O-isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate upon cereals. Science, 105: 95. 1947.Google Scholar
6. Ennis, W. B. Jr. Responses of crop plants to O-isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate. Bot. Gaz. 109: 473–493. 1948.Google Scholar
7. Ennis, W. B. Jr. Histological and cytological responses of certain plants to some aryl carbamic esters. Amer. Jour. Bot. 36: 823. Abs. 1949.Google Scholar
8. Frankel, Sigmund. Die Arzneimittel-Synthese. J. Springel, Berlin. 1927.Google Scholar
9. Freed, Virgil H. Correlation of certain physical constants of some alkyl esters of N-phenyl carbamic acid with their phytotoxicity. Science 111: 285–286. 1950.Google Scholar
10. Freed, Virgil H. Some factors influencing the herbicidal efficacy of isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate. Weeds 1: 48–60. 1951.Google Scholar
11. Friesen, G. Untersuchungen uber die Wirkung des Phenylurethans auf Samenkeimung und Entwicklung. Planta 8: 666–679. 1929.Google Scholar
12. Guinochet, Marcel. Sur quelques modifications des reactions physicochemigues de la cellule vegetale, provoquees par les substances mitoinhibitrices. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 210: 579–580. 1940.Google Scholar
13. Lefevre, Joseph. Similitude des actions cytologiques exercises par le phenylurethane et la colchicine sur des plantules vegetales. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 208: 301–304. 1939.Google Scholar
14. Mitchell, J. W. and Marth, P. C. Sensitivity of grasses and some crop plants to isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate. Science 106: 15–17. 1947.Google Scholar
15. Shaw, W. C. and Swanson, C. R. Techniques and equipment used in evaluating chemicals for their herbicidal properties. Weeds 1: 352–365. 1952.Google Scholar
16. Simonet, Marc and Guinochet, Marcel. Comparaison de l'action sur le ble et le lin de diverses substances provoquant des anomalies de la caryocinese. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 208: 1667–1669. 1939.Google Scholar
17. Swingle, M. C., and Mayer, E. L. Further tests of synthetic organic compounds as insecticides. Jour. Econ. Ent. 37: 843–844. 1944.Google Scholar
18. Templeman, W. G. and Sexton, W. A. Effect of some arylcarbamic esters and related compounds upon cereals and other plant species. Nature 156: 630. 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar