Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T22:37:34.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of Giant Foxtail under Several Temperatures and Photoperiods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Marvin M. Schreiber
Marvin M. Schreiber*
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Lafayette, Indiana
Get access

Abstract

Giant foxtail (Setaria faberii Herrm.) was grown from seed in controlled climate rooms at temperatures of 50, 60, 70, and 80 F and photoperiods of 8, 12, 16, and 20 hours. An inherently poor primary root system resulted in slow and uniform growth during the first few weeks under all environmental conditions. Giant foxtail produced the most dry matter at the highest temperatures and longest photoperiods. No photoperiod inhibited flowering but photoperiod produced differences in development of inflorescences. Within any temperature, the longer the photoperiod the greater the size of panicle and number of seeds produced. Seed viability was high at 80 and 70 F, low at 60 F and zero at 50 F within all photoperiods.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1965 , pp. 40 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blanchard, K. L. and Dunham, R. S. 1956. Comparison of various herbicides for control of giant foxtail (Setaria faberii) growing in corn. NCWCC Res. Rept. 13:87–88.Google Scholar
2. Davidson, J. H. and Slife, F. W. 1954. The control of grasses in established alfalfa with dalapon. Proc. NCWCC 11:38–41.Google Scholar
3. Dunham, R. S., Robinson, R. G., and Jordan, L. S. 1955. Giant foxtail control in corn. NCWCC Res. Rept. 12:62.Google Scholar
4. Hansen, J. R. and Freeman, J. F. 1952. Comparison of CIPC and DNBP for control of weeds in soybeans. NCWCC Res. Rept. 9:102.Google Scholar
5. Heltsley, J. R. and Slife, F. W. 1952. Evaluation of chemicals for pre-emergence treatments on giant foxtail (Setaria faberii) . NCWCC Res. Rept. 9:40.Google Scholar
6. King, L. J. 1952. Germination and chemical control of the giant foxtail grass (Setaria faberii) . Boyce Thompson Inst. Contrib. 16:469–487.Google Scholar
7. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberii with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–29.Google Scholar
8. Morre', D. J., Ingle, M. and Rogers, B. J. 1957. Herbicides for the control of giant foxtail in corn. NCWCC Res. Rept. 14:91.Google Scholar
9. Robinson, R. G., Jordan, L. S. and Dunham, R. S. 1957. Giant foxtail control in Marine flax. NCWCC Res. Rept. 14:95.Google Scholar
10. Santelmann, P. W. and Meade, J. A. 1961. Variation in morphological characteristics and dalapon susceptibility within the species Setaria lutescens and Setaria faberii . Weeds 9:406–410.Google Scholar
11. Santelmann, P. W., and Peters, R. A. 1963. Growth and development of yellow foxtail and giant foxtail. Weeds 11:139–142.Google Scholar
12. Slife, F. W. 1954. The effect of various rates of TCA and dalapon on Setaria faberii grown in established alfalfa. NCWCC Res. Rept. 11:89.Google Scholar
13. Slife, F. W. 1956. Control of giant foxtail. Soybean Digest 16:12–13.Google Scholar
14. Withrow, R. B. and Withrow, Alice P. 1948. Nutriculture. Purdue Univ. Agr. Expt. Stat. Circ. 328. 60 p.Google Scholar