Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-06T06:08:42.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistence and Penetration of Monuron in Asparagus Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. M. Rahn  and
Robert E. Baynard Jr.
E. M. Rahn
Affiliation:
Horticultural Department, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
Robert E. Baynard Jr.
Affiliation:
Horticultural Department, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
Get access

Extract

Monuron, 3–(p–chlorophenyl)–1,1–dimethylurea, is used extensively for weed control in asparagus. Growers apply approximately 1.5 lb/A of monuron in the spring before harvest begins, and the same amount in late June at the end of the harvest season. Each application usually controls weeds for 6 to 8 weeks. Since this chemical controls weeds for such a long period, growers are concerned as to whether, after continued use on the same soil for a period of years, this material might accumulate in the soil to the point where asparagus is injured, or the soil might be made unfit for crops which might follow asparagus. Therefore, a study was made of the persistence and penetration of monuron in soils of asparagus experiments where this chemical had been applied each year for a number of years.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , October 1958 , pp. 432 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © 1958 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Birk, L. A. Penetration and persistence in soil of the herbicide 3–(p–chlorophenyl)–1,1–dimethylurea (CMU). Can. Jour. Agr. Sci. 35:377–387. 1955.Google Scholar
2. Bleidner, W. E., Baker, H. M., Levitsky, M., and Lowen, W. K. Determination of 3–(p–chlorophenyl)–1,1–dimethylurea in soils and plant tissue. Agr. and Food Chem. 2:476–479. 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Danielson, L. L. The crop toxicity period of CMU in a sandy clay loam soil. Weeds 4:255–263. 1956.Google Scholar
4. Hill, G. D., McGahen, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. Jour. 47:93–104. 1955.Google Scholar
5. Loustalot, A. J., Muzik, T. J., and Cruzado, H. J. A study of the persistence of CMU in soil. Agr. Chemicals 8(11):52–53, 97–101. 1953.Google Scholar
6. Ogle, R. E., and Warren, G. F. Fate and activity of herbicides in soils. Weeds 3:257–273. 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sherburne, H. R., Freed, V. H., and Fang, S. C. The use of C14 carbonyl labeled 3–(p–chlorophenyl)–1,1–dimethylurea in a leaching study. Weeds 4:50–54. 1956.Google Scholar
8. Upchurch, R. P., and Pierce, W. C. The leaching of monuron from Lakeland soil. Part I. The effect of amount, intensity, and frequency of simulated rainfall. Weeds 5:321–330. 1957.Google Scholar