Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T00:41:56.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Myth of the Urban Peasant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2000

Simon Clarke
Centre for Comparative Labour Studies, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK,
Lena Varshavskaya
Institute for Comparative Labour Relations Research, Kemerovo, Russia
Sergei Alasheev
Institute for Comparative Labour Relations Research, Samara, Russia
Marina Karelina
Institute for Comparative Labour Relations Research, Samara, Russia
Get access


This paper explores, the ‘myth of the urban peasant’, the widespread belief that urban Russian households are surviving the collapse of employment and money incomes by turning to subsistence agriculture. On the basis of the analysis of official and survey data the paper shows that although many urban households grow food in their garden plots, those with low money incomes are the least likely to do so, while subsistence production is a complement rather than an alternative to paid employment. Moreover, those who do grow their own food work long hours for very little return, spending no less of their money income on buying food than do those who grow nothing. The implication is that dacha use is a leisure activity of the better-off rather than a survival strategy of the poor. Regional data suggests that urban agricultural production persists in those regions in which commercial agriculture and monetised relations are least developed which, it is surmised, retain memories of past shortages.

Research Article
© 2000 BSA Publications Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)