Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 36
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Abdullah, Walid Jumblatt 2016. Managing minorities in competitive authoritarian states: multiracialism and the hijab issue in Singapore. Indonesia and the Malay World, Vol. 44, Issue. 129, p. 211.

    Abdullah, Walid Jumblatt 2016. Assessing party structures: why some regimes are more authoritarian than others. Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 70, Issue. 5, p. 525.

    Handlin, Samuel 2016. Observing incumbent abuses: improving measures of electoral and competitive authoritarianism with new data. Democratization, p. 1.

    Harvey, Cole J. 2016. Changes in the menu of manipulation: Electoral fraud, ballot stuffing, and voter pressure in the 2011 Russian election. Electoral Studies, Vol. 41, p. 105.

    Hess, Steve 2016. Sources of Authoritarian Resilience in Regional Protest Waves: The Post-Communist Colour Revolutions and 2011 Arab Uprisings. Government and Opposition, Vol. 51, Issue. 01, p. 1.

    Ng, Hoi Yu 2016. What Drives Young People Into Opposition Parties Under Hybrid Regimes? A Comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore. Asian Politics & Policy, Vol. 8, Issue. 3, p. 436.

    Semenov, Andrey Lobanova, Olesya and Zavadskaya, Margarita 2016. When do political parties join protests? A comparative analysis of party involvement in “for fair elections” movement. East European Politics, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 81.

    Boas, Taylor C. 2015. Voting for Democracy: Campaign Effects in Chile's Democratic Transition. Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, p. 67.

    Gel'man, Vladimir 2015. Political Opposition in Russia: A Troubled Transformation. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 67, Issue. 2, p. 177.

    Golosov, Grigorii V. 2015. Factors of party system fragmentation: A cross-national study. Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 50, Issue. 1, p. 42.

    Golosov, Grigorii V. 2015. The Number of Parties and Party System Nationalization in an Integrated Analytical Framework. Comparative Sociology, Vol. 14, Issue. 5, p. 662.

    Golosov, Grigorii V. 2015. Do spoilers make a difference? Instrumental manipulation of political parties in an electoral authoritarian regime, the case of Russia. East European Politics, Vol. 31, Issue. 2, p. 170.

    Knutsen, Carl Henrik and Nygård, Håvard Mokleiv 2015. Institutional Characteristics and Regime Survival: Why Are Semi-Democracies Less Durable Than Autocracies and Democracies?. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 656.

    LaPorte, Jody 2015. Hidden in plain sight: political opposition and hegemonic authoritarianism in Azerbaijan. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 339.

    Pearce, Katy E. 2015. Democratizing kompromat: the affordances of social media for state-sponsored harassment. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 18, Issue. 10, p. 1158.

    Tezcür, Güneş Murat 2015. Violence and nationalist mobilization: the onset of the Kurdish insurgency in Turkey. Nationalities Papers, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 248.

    Brancati, Dawn 2014. Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 313.

    Giusti, Serena and Fassi, Enrico 2014. The European Endowment for Democracy and Democracy Promotion in the EU Neighbourhood. The International Spectator, Vol. 49, Issue. 4, p. 112.

    Golosov, Grigorii V. 2014. Authoritarian Electoral Engineering and its Limits: A Curious Case of the Imperiali Highest Averages Method in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 66, Issue. 10, p. 1611.

    Donno, Daniela 2013. Elections and Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 57, Issue. 3, p. 703.


Defeating Dictators: Electoral Change and Stability in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes

  • Valerie J. Bunce (a1) and Sharon L. Wolchik (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 18 December 2009

What explains electoral stability and change in competitive authoritarian regimes? This article addresses the question by comparing eleven elections—six of which led to continuity in authoritarian rule and five of which led to the victory of the opposition—that took place between 1998 and 2008 in competitive authoritarian regimes countries located in the postcommunist region. Using interviews conducted with participants in all of these elections and other types of data and constructing a research design that allowed the authors to match these two sets of elections on a number of important dimensions, they assess two groups of hypotheses—those that highlight institutional, structural, and historical aspects of regime and opposition strength on the eve of these elections and others that highlight characteristics of the elections themselves. The authors conclude that the key difference was whether the opposition adopted a tool kit of novel and sophisticated electoral strategies that made them more popular and effective challengers to the regime.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Politics
  • ISSN: 0043-8871
  • EISSN: 1086-3338
  • URL: /core/journals/world-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *