Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Elections and the Democratic Class Struggle


It is commonly believed that elections in the industrial democracies reflect a democratic class struggle, according to which lower-income voters support parties of the Left while higher-income voters protect their interest by voting for parties of the Right. This interpretation hinges critically on a series of implicit assumptions. First, the class-struggle thesis assumes that most industrial democracies have majoritarian political institutions. Second, it assumes that the typical form of political competition follows the responsible-parties model, which implies, among other things, that parties are fundamentally programmatic, adopting distinctive positions along a left-right continuum. When these assumptions are evaluated in light of the available evidence on the nature of party systems, political competition, and voting behavior, they are judged to be largely implausible. Thus, the democratic-class-struggle thesis constitutes a seriously flawed interpretation of elections.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Kenneth A. Bollen and Robert W. Jackman , “Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of In-come,” American Sociological Review 50 (August 1985), 438–57

Richard E. Dawson and James A. Robinson “Inter-party Competition, Economic Variables, and Welfare Policies in the American States, Journal of Politics 25 (May 1963), 265–89

Douglas A. Hibbs Jr., “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy,” American Political Science Review 71 (December 1977), 1467–87

Margaret Weir and Theda Skocpol , “State Structures and the Possibili-ties for 'Keynesian' Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States,” in Peter Evans , Dietrich Rueschemeyer , and Theda Skocpol , eds., Bringing the State Back In (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985) 107–63

Francis G. Castles and Peter Mair, “Left-Right Political Scales: Some 'Expert' Judgments,” European Journal of Political Research 12 (March 1984), 7388

Leon D. Epstein , “What Happened to the British Party Model?” American Political Science Review 74 (March 1980), 932

Kaare Strom , “Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions,” Comparative Political Studies 17 (July 1984), 199226

Joseph A. Schlesinger , “On the Theory of Party Organization,” Journal of Politics 46 (May 1984), 369400

Otto A. Davis , Melvin J. Hinich , and Peter C. Ordeshook , “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process,” American Political Science Review 64 (June 1970), 426–48

Randall L. Calvert , “Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence,” American Journal of Political Science 29 (February 1985), 6995

Benjamin I. Page , “The Theory of Political Ambiguity,” American Political Science Re-view 70 (September 1976), 742–52

D. E. Butler and Anthony King , The British General Election of 1964 (London: Macmillan, 1965)

Michels , “Some Reflections on the Sociological Character of Political Parties,” American Political Science Review 21 (November 1927), 753–72

Francis G. Castles and R. D. McKinlay , “Public Welfare Provision, Scandinavia, and the Sheer Futility of the Sociological Approach to Politics,” British Journal of Political Science 9 (April 1979), 151–71

Ann Shola Orloff and Theda Skocpol , “Why Not Equal Protection? Explaining the Politics of Public Social Spending in Britain, 1900–1911, and the United States, 1880s–1920,” American Sociological Review 49 (December 1984), 726–50, at 729

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Politics
  • ISSN: 0043-8871
  • EISSN: 1086-3338
  • URL: /core/journals/world-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 8 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 145 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.