Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Improving Forecasts of State Failure

  • Gary King (a1) and Langche Zeng (a2)

This article offers the first independent scholarly evaluation of the claims, forecasts, and causal inferences of the State Failure Task Force and its efforts to forecast when states will fail. State failure refers to the collapse of the authority of the central government to impose order, as in civil wars, revolutionary wars, genocides, politicides, and adverse or disruptive regime transitions. States that sponsor terrorism or allow it to be organized within their borders are all failed states. This task force, set up at the behest of Vice President Gore in 1994, has been led by a group of distinguished academics working as consultants to the U.S. CIA. State Failure Task Force reports and publications have received attention in the media, in academia, and from public decision makers. The article identifies several methodological errors in the task force work that cause its reported forecast probabilities of conflict to be too large, its causal inferences to be biased in unpredictable directions, and its claims of forecasting performance to be exaggerated. However, the article also finds that the task force has amassed the best and most carefully collected data on state failure to date, and the required corrections provided in this article, although very large in effect, are easy to implement. The article also demonstrates how to improve forecasting performance to levels significantly greater than even corrected versions of its models. Although the matter is still a highly uncertain endeavor, the authors are nevertheless able to offer the first accurate forecasts of state failure, along with procedures and results that may be of practical use in informing foreign policy decision making. The article also describes a number of strong empirical regularities that may help in ascertaining the causes of state failure.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Norman E. Breslow , “Statistics in Epidemiology: The Case-Control Study,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (March 1996)

Steven Bernstein , Richard Ned Lebow , Janice Gross Stein , and Steven Weber , “God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World,” European Journal of International Relations 6 (March 2000)

Ted Robert Gurr , “Why Minorities Rebel: A Global Analysis of Communal Mobilization and Conflict since 1945,” International Political Science Review 14, no. 2 (1993)

John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald , “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory,” American Journal of Sociology 82 (May 1977)

Nathaniel Beck , Gary King , and Langche Zeng , “Improving Quantitative Studies of International Conflict: A Conjecture,” American Political Science Review 94 (March 2000)

C. E. Metz , “Basic Principles of ROC Analysis,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 8 (Spring 1978)

Nathaniel Beck , Jonathan Katz , and Richard Tucker , “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable,” American Journal of Political Science 42 (October 1998)

Ted Robert Gurr , “Persistence and Change in Political Systems, 1800-1971,” American Political Science Review 68 (December 1974)

Edward N. Muller and Erich Weede , “Cross-National Variation in Political Violence: A Rational Action Approach,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 34 (December 1990)

Edward Mansfield and Jack Snyder , “Democratization and War,” Foreign Affairs 74 (1995)

Benjamin Valentino , “Final Solutions: The Causes of Genocide and Mass Killing,” Security Studies 9 (Spring 2000)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Politics
  • ISSN: 0043-8871
  • EISSN: 1086-3338
  • URL: /core/journals/world-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 24 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 344 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.