Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 27
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Duckett, Jane and Wang, Hua 2013. Extending political participation in China: new opportunities for citizens in the policy process. Journal of Asian Public Policy, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 263.

    Tsai, Wen-Hsuan and Kao, Peng-Hsiang 2013. Secret Codes of Political Propaganda: The Unknown System of Writing Teams. The China Quarterly, Vol. 214, p. 394.

    Cox, Michael 2009. Why did We Get the End of the Cold War Wrong?. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 161.

    Evanson, Robert K. 2008. Economic interest groups and the consolidation of democracy in the Czech Republic. Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 8, Issue. 1-2, p. 33.

    McGrath, Conor 2008. The development and regulation of lobbying in the new member states of the European Union. Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 8, Issue. 1-2, p. 15.

    Thomas, Clive S. and Hrebenar, Ronald J. 2008. Understanding interest groups, lobbying and lobbyists in developing democracies. Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 8, Issue. 1-2, p. 1.

    Johnston, Hank and Mueller, Carol 2001. Unobtrusive Practices of Contention in Leninist Regimes. Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 44, Issue. 3, p. 351.

    Johnston, Hank and Mueller, Carol 2001. Unobtrusive Practices of Contention in Leninist Regimes. Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 44, Issue. 3, p. 351.

    Mueller, Carol 1999. Escape from the GDR, 1961–1989: Hybrid Exit Repertoires in a Disintegrating Leninist Regime1. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, Issue. 3, p. 697.

    Korbonski, Andrzej 1993. The decline and rise of pluralism in East Central Europe, 1949–1989, or how not to see the forest for the trees. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 26, Issue. 4, p. 432.

    Waller, Michael 1993. Political actors and political roles in East‐Central Europe. Journal of Communist Studies, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 21.

    Hill, Ronald J. 1992. Communist politics: An evolutionary approach. Journal of Communist Studies, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Zwick, Peter 1991. The Perestroika of Soviet Studies: Thinking and Teaching About the Soviet Union in Comparative Perspective. PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 24, Issue. 03, p. 461.

    Baum, Richard 1989. Introduction: Beyond Leninism? Economic reform and political development in Post-Mao China∗. Studies in Comparative Communism, Vol. 22, Issue. 2-3, p. 111.

    Korbonski, Andrzej 1989. The politics of economic reforms in Eastern Europe: The last thirty years. Soviet Studies, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Skilling, H. Gordon 1983. Interest Groups and Communist Politics Revisited. World Politics, Vol. 36, Issue. 01, p. 1.

    Bullard, Monte Ray 1979. People's Republic of China Elite Studies: A Review of the Literature. Asian Survey, Vol. 19, Issue. 8, p. 789.

    Janos, Andrew C. 1979. Interest groups and the structure of power: Critique and comparisons. Studies in Comparative Communism, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 6.

    Ollawa, Patrick E. 1978. Political participation in a developing society: Theoretical considerations and the case of Zambia. The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 169.

    Friedgut, Theodore H. 1976. Interests and groups in Soviet policy‐making: The MTS reforms. Soviet Studies, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 524.


Interest Groups and Communist Politics

  • H. Gordon Skilling (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 July 2011

The idea that interest groups may play a significant role in Communist politics has, until recently, not been seriously entertained either by Western political scientists or by Soviet legal specialists. The concept of “totalitarianism” that has dominated the analysis of communism in the West has seemed to preclude the possibility that interest groups could challenge or affect the single ruling party as the fount of all power. The uniqueness of a totalitarian system has been deemed to lie in the very totality of its political power, excluding, as it were by definition, any area of autonomous behavior by groups other than the state or party, and still more, preventing serious influence by them on the process of decision-making. Marxist theorists, starting from different presuppositions, have assumed that the single ruling party, the organization of the working class, best knew the “real” interests of the people as a whole, and have denied the possibility of fundamental conflicts of interest within the working class, or between it and associated friendly classes such as the peasantry. Within the ruling party itself, groups or factions opposing the leadership have not been admitted in theory or permitted in practice.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Totalitarianism, edited by Carl J. Friedrich (New York1954)

Bauer Inkeles, and Clyde Kluckhohn , How the Soviet System Works (Cambridge, Mass., 1956)

David Granick , The Red Executive (New York1960).

Ernst Richert , Macht ohne Mandat (Köln and Opladen1963)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Politics
  • ISSN: 0043-8871
  • EISSN: 1086-3338
  • URL: /core/journals/world-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *