No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2011
In a previous article we attempted to examine the intricate net in which geography and the study of international relations are interwoven. The basic problem with which we dealt was the partitioning of the space available to men. Our conclusion was that this partitioned, differentiated space is organized: by studying its organization, geography can describe and analyze a network of relations in space which is both useful and at times indispensable to an understanding of international relations.
1 “Geography and International Relations,” World Politics, III, NO. 2(January 1951), 153–73.
2 We are indebted to Professor Paul Montel of the Sorbonne and to Dr. Maurice Levy of the Institute for Advanced Study for discussing this point with us.
3 These problems have been studied at greater length in the recently published volume, Gottmann, Jean, La politique des états et leur géographie, Paris, Armand Colin, 1952.Google Scholar For the study of prehistoric routes, we are much indebted to the materials supplied by Professor A. Varagnac of Paris.