Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:01:04.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Strategy of Political Liberalization: A Comparative View of Gorbachev's Reforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Christopher Young
Christopher Young
Affiliation:
University of California
Get access

Abstract

This article examines three Western European cases from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and shows that political liberalization does not necessarily require a reformer's commitment to democracy. Under the right circumstances, even conservative politicians may find liberalization to be a rational and acceptable means to secure their power and to defeat powerful opponents, despite the risk of future upheavals. Such circumstances were present in the Soviet Union in the late 1980s, when Mikhail Gorbachev and his supporters used the strategy of political liberalization to remove the threat posed by their rivals in the party apparatus.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , October 1992 , pp. 47 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A good discussion of the inadequacy of deterministic “;societal” models is presented by DeNardo, James, Power in Numbers (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985), 8–32.Google Scholar George Breslauer makes this point for the Soviet case; see Breslauer, , “Evaluating Gorbachev as Leader,” Soviet Economy 5, no. 4 (1989).Google Scholar

2 Traman, David B., The Governmental Process (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971), 188—93.Google Scholar For a discussion of the prerequisites for collective action, see Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

3 See, e.g., O'Donnell, Guillermo and Schmitter, Philippe C., Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986), 15–21Google Scholar; Palma, Giuseppe Di, To Craft Democracies (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990), 32–40Google Scholar; Przeworski, Adam, Democracy and the Market (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 54–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarRussell Bova applies this literature to the Sovietcase in “Political Dynamics of the Post-Communist Transition: A Comparative Perspective,” World Politics 44 (October 1991).Google Scholar

4 Adelman, Paul, Gladstone, Disraeli and Later Victorian Politics (Essex, England: Longman Group, 1983), 11Google Scholar; Blake, Robert, Disraeli (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1967), 242–43.Google Scholar

5 Cowling, Maurice, 1867: Disraeli, Gladstone, and Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967), 48–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Blake (fn. 4) and F. B. Smith argue that Disraeli was more concerned with passing any kind of bill than with the specific content of his bill. Cowling (fn. 5) casts doubt on this idea, asserting that Disraeli's strategy could not have been better designed to serve conservative interests. See Smith, , The Making of the Second Reform Bill (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

7 Blake (fn. 4), 12.

8 Adelman (fn. 4), 10; Cowling (fn. 5), 64–66.

9 Blake (fn. 4), 463.

10 Harnerow, Theodore S., The Social Foundations of German Unification (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969), 297–301.Google Scholar

11 Pflanze, Otto, Bismarck and the Development of Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963), 219.Google Scholar

12 For an extensive discussion of the Prussian liberals' fears about the consequences of democratization, see Sheehan, James J., German Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978).Google Scholar

13 Eyck, Erich, Bismarck and the German Empire (New York: W. W. Norton, 1968), 115—16.Google Scholar

14 Gooch, Brison D., The Reign of Napoleon III (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969)Google Scholar; Guerard, Albert, Napoleon III (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1943)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thompson, J. M., Louis Napoleon and the Second Empire (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1954).Google Scholar

15 Gall, Lothar, Bismarck The White Revolutionary (London: Allen and Unwin, 1986), 286—89.Google Scholar

16 Eyck (fn. 13), 115–18.

17 Gall (fn. 15), 288–89.

18 Hamerow (fn. 10), 292–93, 390–91.

19 Pflanze (fn. 11), 331–34, 354–55.

20 Wehler, Hans-Ulrich, The German Empire (Dover, N.H.: Berg Publishers, 1985), 53–55.Google Scholar

21 The following section is based on the account of Smith, Denis Mack, Italy: A Modern History (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1959), 211–62.Google Scholar

22 Aslund, Anders, Gorbachev's Struggle for Economic Reform (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1989), 10–21Google Scholar; Colton, Timothy J., The Dilemma of Reform in the Soviet Union (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1986), 32–67Google Scholar; Gail Lapidus, “Society under Strain,” and Tucker, Robert, “Swollen State, Spent Society: Stalin's Legacy to Brezhnev's Russia,” a both in Hoffman, Erik and Laird, Robbin, eds., The Soviet Polity in the Modern Era (New York: Aldine, 1984)Google Scholar; Lewin, Moshe, The Gorbachev Phenomenon (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 101–11.Google Scholar

23 Brown, Archie, “Power and Policy in a Time of Leadership Transition, 1982–1988,” in Brown, , ed., Political Leadership in the Soviet Union (London: MacMillan Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; White, Stephen, Gorbachev in Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 1–22.Google Scholar

24 Aslund (fn. 22), 23–55.

25 Abalkin, L. I., speech at the Nineteenth Party Conference, XIX Vsesoyuznaya Konferentsiya Kommunisticheskoi Partii Sovetskogo Soyuza: Stenograficheskii Otchet (Stenographic report of the XIX Party Conference of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union), (Moscow: Politizdat, 1988), 114–19Google Scholar; Aslund, Anders, “Gorbachev, Perestroika, and Economic Crisis,” Problems of Communism 40 (January-April 1991)Google Scholar; Goldman, Marshall I., “Gorbachev the Economist,” Foreign Affairs 69 (Spring 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ed. Hewett, A., “The New Soviet Plan,” Foreign Affairs 69 (Winter 1990–1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Noren, James H., “The Soviet Economic Crisis: Another Perspective,” Soviet Economy 6, no. 1 (1990).Google Scholar

26 New York Times, May 28, 1987, p. 1.

27 “Perekhodit' k Konkretnym Delam,” Pravda, August 27, 1987; “Zhivoi Istochnik Natsiona'nykh Traditsii,” Sovetskaya Kul'tura, April 7, 1988; Speech to XIX Party Conference, Stenograficheskii Otchet (fn. 25), 82—88; “Aktivnaya Pozitsiya Kommunista,” Pravda, December 25, 1988.

28 See Ul'yanov's, M. A. speech at the Nineteenth Party Conference, Stenograficheskii Otchet (fn. 25), 190–99Google Scholar; White (fn. 23), 196–99; Andreeva, Nina, “Ne Mogu Postupat'sya Printsipami,” Sovetskaya Rossiya, March 13, 1988.Google Scholar

29 “Zhivoe Tvorchestvo Naroda: Doklad Tovarishcha M.S. Gorbacheva,” Pravda, December 11, 1984; “O Perestroike i Kadrovoi Politike Partii,” Pravda, January 28, 1987.

30 Nineteenth Party Conference, Stenograficheskii Otchet (fn. 25), 19–92, 112–20, 135–44.

31 Gooding, John, “The XXVIII Congress of the CPSU in Perspective,” Soviet Studies 43, no.2 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Ibid., 242–46.

33 My own survey of Soviet announcements of personnel changes. See Radzievskii, Viktor, “Konservatism Ukhodit v Otstavku,” Moskovskye Novosti 9 (1990)Google Scholar; “Kogo Zakhlestyvayut Volny?” Pravda, March 11, 1990.

34 Aslund, Anders, “The Making of Economic Policy in 1989 and 1990,” Soviet Economy 6, no. 1 (1990).Google Scholar

35 Mack Smith (fn. 21), 337–47.