Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T19:41:49.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Molasses and Sugars in Poultry Feeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

P. W. Waldroup
P. W. Waldroup
Affiliation:
Department of Animal SciencesUniversity of ArkansasFayetteville, ArkansasUSA72701
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , October 1981 , pp. 193 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cooney, W. T., and Parker, J. F. 1952. Wood Sugar Molasses as a Feedstuff for Laying Hens. Poultry Sci. 31: 343–350.Google Scholar
Cuervo, C., Restrepo, L.Bushman, D. H. and Rendon, M. 1972a. The Sugars and Various Cations Present in Cane Molasses and their Effect on Diarrhoea in Chickens. Poultry Sci. 51: 813–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuervo, C., Bushman, D. H. and Santos, E. (1972b). The effect of deionization and drying of cane molasses on their laxative action in chickens. Poultry Sci. 51: 821–824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damron, B. L., and Harms, R. H. 1968. The Value of Masonex for use in Broiler Diets. Poultry Sci. 47: 1330–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, F. J., and Dilworth, B. C. 1966. Wood Molasses Tested for Broiler Rations. Poultry Meat, Oct, pp. 28–29.Google Scholar
Ewing, W. R. 1963. Poultry Nutrition (5th Ed.) The Ray Ewing Co., Pasadena, California.Google Scholar
Gonzales, F. B., Randel, P. F. and Soldevila, M. 1980. Dried Rum Distillery Stillage in Broiler Rations. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 54: 194–203.Google Scholar
Halloran, H. R. 1965a. Feeding Molasses to Poultry. Pacific Molasses Co. Bulletin No. T. 4Google Scholar
Halloran, H. R. 1965b. Molasses in Poultry Nutrition. Feedstuffs 37(33): 48Google Scholar
Kondo, A. K. and Ross, E. (1962a). The Effect of Some Constituents in Molasses on the Water Metabolism of Chicks. Poultry Sci. 41: 1126–1131.Google Scholar
Kondo, A. K. and Ross, E. (1962b). Effect of Certain lonic Interactions on the Water Metabolism of Chicks. Poultry Sci. 41: 1132–1136Google Scholar
Lewicki, W. 1978 Production, Application and Marketing of Concentrated Molasses-Fermentation Effluent (Vinasses). Process Bio-Chem, June 1978.Google Scholar
McGinnis, J., MacGregor, H. I. and Carver, J. S. 1948. Wood Sugar Molasses as a Feedstuff for Chicks. Poultry Sci. 27: 459–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, J. L., Deaton, J. W. and Reese, F. N. 1978. Effect of sucrose in the initial drinking water of broiler chicks on mortality and growth. Poultry Sci. 57: 985–988.Google Scholar
Matterson, L. D., 1968. Sugar in chick diet results in improved feed efficiency. Feedstuffs, 06 15, pp. 42–43.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1971. Atlas of Nutritional data on United States and Canadian Feeds. National Academy of Sciences. Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Ott, W. H., Boucher, R. V. and Knandel, H. C. 1942a. Feeding-Cane Molasses as a constituent of Poultry Rations I. Molasses for Growing Chickens Poultry Sci. 21: 340–345.Google Scholar
Ott, W. H., Boucher, R. V. and Knandel, H. C. 1942b. Feeding-Cane Molasses as a Constituent of Poultry Rations II. Molasses for Adult Chickens Poultry Sci. 21: 536–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palafox, A. L., and Rosenberg, M. M. 1954. An evaluation of low-grade sugar in starter and grower rations of chickens. Poultry Science 33: 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, L. R., 1959. Factors in Developing Grades and Standards for Blackstrap Molasses for Feed. U.S.D.A. Marketing Research. Rep. No. 302, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. M., 1953a. A Study of B-Grade and Retinery B-Molasses in Layer Rations. Poultry Sci. 32: 605–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. M., 1953b. Low-grade sugar, a Potential Carbohydrate Feedstuff for Laying Chickens. Poultry Sci. 32: 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. M., 1954. An Evaluation of B-Grade Molasses in Chick Starter Rations. Poultry Sci. 33: 382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. M., 1955a. Response of Chicks to Graded Concentrations of Cane Final Molasses. Poultry Sci. 34: 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. M., 1955b. Recent Research on Feeding Cane Final Molasses to Chickens. Sugar Journal, September.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. M., 1956. Evaluation of Cuban High Test Syrup in Chick Rations. Poultry Sci. 35: 558–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. M., and Palafox, A. L. 1956a. Response of Growing and Mature Pullets to Continuous Feeding of Cane Final Molasses. Poultry Sci. 35: 292–303.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. M. and Palafox, A. L. 1956b. Effect of Certain Cations in Cane Final Molasses on Faecal Moisture of Chicks Poultry Sci. 35: 682:686.Google Scholar
Ross, E., 1959. Molasses Pellets: An approach to the Feed Mixing Problem. Hawaii Farm Science. Oct, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
Ross, E. 1960a. The Effect of Water Restriction on Chicks Fed Different Levels of Molasses. Poultry Sci. 39: 999–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, E., 1960b. Storage of Mixed Feeds Containing Cane Final Molasses. 1. Effect on chick growth and feed utilization. Poultry Sci. 39: 985–993.Google Scholar
Ross, E., and Kondo, A. 1958. Deionized Molasses for Poultry. Hawaii Farm Sci., 01, p. 4.Google Scholar
Ross, E., and Kondo, A. K. 1959. Effect of Molasses on Digestion Rate of Chicks. Hawaii Farm Sci., 01, p. 3.Google Scholar
Scott, M. L., 1953. Use of Molasses in the Feeding of Farm Animals. Technological Report Series No.9. Sugar Research Foundation, Inc., New York. N. Y.Google Scholar
Smith, A. J. and Keen, P. R. 1971. Sugar as a replacement for maize in diets for broilers and laying pullets. Feedstuffs, 07 24. pp. 26.Google Scholar
Soldevila, M., Carlo, I. and Perez, R. F. 1970. Rate of Gain and Utilization of Feed as Affected by Different Levels of Sugarcane Molasses in Starting. Growing, and Fattcning Diets for Birds of a Laying and a Broiler Stock. J. Agri. University Puerto Rico 64: 161–169.Google Scholar
Soldevila, M., and Rojas-Daporia, M. 1976. Effect of Different Levels of Sugarcane Molasses on Egg Production. J. Agric. University Puerto Rico 60: 631–634.Google Scholar
Soldevila, M., and Irizarry, R 1977. Influence of dry rum Distillery Stops in Diets for White Leghorn hens on Laying Rate. Feed Conversion, and Egg Size and Quality. J. Agric. University of Puerto Rico 61: 465–469.Google Scholar
Splittgerber, H., and Gysaf, M. 1963. Testing different proportions of sugar as a component of balanced feeds for fattening poultry. Arch. Geflugk. 27: 401–408.Google Scholar
Thaxton, J.P., and Parkhurst, C. R. 1976. Growth. Efficiency and Livability of Newly hatched Broilers as Influenced by Hydration and Intake of Sucrose. Poultry Science 55: 2275–2279.Google Scholar
Upp, C. W., 1937. Cane Molasses in Poultry Rations. Louisianna Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 289Google Scholar
Walker, M., and Koss, E. 1960. The Influence of Molasses Feeds on Egg Flavor. Hawaii Farm Science 9: (2): 7–8.Google Scholar
Wagh, P. V., and Waibel, P. E. 1966. Metabolizability and Nutritional Implications of L-arabinose and D-xylose for Chicks., J. Nutr. 90. 207–211Google Scholar
Weeth, H. J., and Rosenberg, M. M. 1954. Effect of Cane Final Molasses on Certain Cations in the Serum and Bones of Chicks. Poultry Sci. 33: 1135–1140.Google Scholar
Winter, A. R., 1929. Cane Molasses for Poultry. Poultry Sci. 8: 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, R. W., Bushwell, D. A. and Rosenberg, M. M. 1956. Effect of Rations on the Ph and Microflora in Selected Regions of the Intestinal Tract of Chickens. Poultry Sci. 35: 126–132.Google Scholar