Skip to main content Accessibility help

The welfare of layer hens in cage and cage-free housing systems

  • K.M. HARTCHER (a1) (a2) and B. JONES (a1) (a2)


Historically, animal welfare has been defined by the absence of negative states such as disease, hunger and thirst. However, a shift in animal welfare science has led to the understanding that good animal welfare cannot be achieved without the experience of positive states. Unequivocally, the housing environment has significant impacts on animal welfare. This review summarises how cage and cage-free housing systems impact some of the key welfare issues for layer hens: musculoskeletal health, disease, severe feather pecking, and behavioural expression. Welfare in cage-free systems is currently highly variable, and needs to be addressed by management practices, genetic selection, further research, and appropriate design and maintenance of the housing environment. Conventional cages lack adequate space for movement, and do not include features to allow behavioural expression. Hens therefore experience extreme behavioural restriction, musculoskeletal weakness and an inability to experience positive affective states. Furnished cages retain the benefits of conventional cages in terms of production efficiency and hygiene, and offer some benefits of cage-free systems in terms of an increased behavioural repertoire, but do not allow full behavioural expression. In Australia, while the retail market share of free-range eggs has been increasing in recent years, the majority of hens (approximately 70%) remain housed in conventional cages, and furnished cages are not in use. Unlike many other countries including New Zealand, Canada, and all those within the European Union (where a legislated phase-out commenced in 1999 and was completed in 2012) a legislative phase-out of conventional cages has not been announced in Australia. This review came about in light of the current development of the Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines for Poultry in Australia. These standards are intended to provide nationally consistent legislation for the welfare of all poultry species in all Australian states and territories. While it is purported that the standards will reflect contemporary scientific knowledge, there is no scientific review, nor scientific committee to inform the development of these standards, and conventional cages are permitted in the standards with no phase-out proposed.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The welfare of layer hens in cage and cage-free housing systems
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The welfare of layer hens in cage and cage-free housing systems
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The welfare of layer hens in cage and cage-free housing systems
      Available formats


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (, which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Corresponding author:


Hide All
ANIMAL HEALTH AUSTRALIA (2016) Poultry Standards and Guidelines Q&A Poultry Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines Questions and Answers., accessed 4 July 2017.
APPLEBY, M.C. and HUGHES, B.O. (1991) Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. World's Poultry Science Journal 47: 109-128.
APPLEBY, M.C., WALKER, A.W., NICOL, C.J., LINDBERG, A.C., FREIRE, R., HUGHES, B.O. and ELSON, H.A. (2002) Development of furnished cages for laying hens. British Poultry Science 43: 489-500.
AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION (2016) Regulation of Australian Agriculture, Productivity Commission Inquiry Report., accessed 11 July 2017.
BESSEI, W. and KJAER, J. (2015) Feather pecking in layers - State of research and implications, in: 26th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium 26: 214-221.
BESTMAN, M., KOENE, P. and WAGENAAR, J.P. (2009) Influence of farm factors on the occurrence of feather pecking in organic reared hens and their predictability for feather pecking in the laying period. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121: 120-125.
BLOKHUIS, H.J. (1983) The relevance of sleep in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal 39: 32-37.
BLOKHUIS, H.J. (1984) Rest in poultry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12: 289-303.
BRACKE, M.B.M. and HOPSTER, H. (2006) Assessing the importance of natural behavior for animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19: 77-89.
BROOM, D.M. (1986) Indicators of poor welfare. British Veterinary Journal 142: 524-526.
CHAUVE, C. (1998) The poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778): current situation and future prospects for control. Veterinary Parasitology 79: 239-245.
COOPER, J.J. and ALBENTOSA, M.J. (2003) Behavioural priorities of laying hens. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 14: 127-149.
COOPER, J.J. and APPLEBY, M.C. (2003) The value of environmental resources to domestic hens. A comparison of the work rate for food and for a nest as a function of time. Animal Welfare 12: 39-52.
CORDINER, L.S. and SAVORY, C.J. (2001) Use of perches and nestboxes by laying hens in relation to social status, based on examination of consistency of ranking orders and frequency of interaction. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71: 305-317.
CRONIN, G.M., BARNETT, J.L. and HEMSWORTH, P.H. (2012) The importance of pre-laying behaviour and nest boxes for laying hen welfare: a review. Animal Production Science 52: 398-405.
DAWKINS, M.S. (1981) Priorities in the cage size and flooring preferences of domestic hens. British Poultry Science 22: 255-263.
DONALDSON, C.J. and O'CONNELL, N.E. (2012) The influence of access to aerial perches on fearfulness, social behaviour and production parameters in free-range laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 142: 51-60.
DOWNING, J.A. and BRYDEN, W.L. (2008) Determination of corticosterone concentrations in egg albumen: A non-invasive indicator of stress in laying hens. Physiology & Behaviour 95: 381-387.
DUNCAN, I.J.H. (2001) The pros and cons of cages. World's Poultry Science Journal 57: 381-390.
EFSA (2005) Welfare aspects of various systems for keeping laying hens. EFSA Journal 197: 1-23.
EFSA (2015) Scientific Opinion on welfare aspects of the use of perches for laying hens. EFSA Journal 13: 1-70.
EKESBO, I. (2011) Domestic Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus). In: Farm animal behaviour, characteristics for assessment of health and welfare CABI, Wallingford, England, UK, pp.105-112.
ENGEL, J., WIDOWSKI, T., TILBROOK, A. and HEMSWORTH, P. (2011) Further investigation of non-invasive measures of stress in laying hens. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, New South Wales, 14-16th February, 22: 126-129.
ENNEKING, S.A., CHENG, H.W., JEFFERSON-MOORE, K.Y., EINSTEIN, M.E., RUBIN, D.A. and HESTER, P.Y. (2012) Early access to perches in caged White Leghorn pullets. Poultry Science 91: 2114-2120.
FLEMING, R.H., MCCORMACK, H.A., MCTEIR, L. and WHITEHEAD, C.C. (2005) Nutritional and genetic interactions in avian osteoporosis. Proceedings of the 15th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Balatonfured, Hungary, 25-29 September, 2005, p.45.
FLEMING, R.H., MCCORMACK, H.A., MCTEIR, L. and WHITEHEAD, C.C. (2006) Relationships between genetic, environmental and nutritional factors influencing osteoporosis in laying hens. British Poultry Science 47: 742-755.
FOSSUM, O., JANSSON, D.S., ETTERLIN, P.E. and VÅGSHOLM, I. (2009) Causes of mortality in laying hens in different housing systems in 2001 to 2004. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 51: 1-9.
FRASER, D. (2003) Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: the interplay of science and values. Animal Welfare 12: 433-443.
FRASER, D., DUNCAN, I.J.H., EDWARDS, S.A., GRANDIN, T., GREGORY, N.G., GUYONNET, V., HEMSWORTH, P.H., HUERTAS, S.M., HUZZEY, J.M., MELLOR, D.J., MENCH, J.A., SPINKA, M. and WHAY, H.R. (2013) General Principles for the welfare of animals in production systems: The underlying science and its application. Veterinary Journal 198: 19-27.
GUNNARSSON, S., KEELING, L. and SVEDBERG, J. (1999) Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. British Poultry Science 40: 12-18.
GUNNARSSON, S., MATTHEWS, L., FOSTER, T. and TEMPLE, W. (2000) The demand for straw and feathers as litter substrates by laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 321-330.
HARTCHER, K.M., TRAN, K.T.N., WILKINSON, S.J., HEMSWORTH, P.H., THOMSON, P.C. and CRONIN, G.M. (2015) The effects of environmental enrichment and beak-trimming during the rearing period on subsequent feather damage due to feather-pecking in laying hens. Poultry Science 94: 852-859.
HARTCHER, K., WILKINSON, S., HEMSWORTH, P. and CRONIN, G. (2016) Severe feather-pecking in non-cage laying hens and some associated and predisposing factors: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal 72: 103-114.
HEERKENS, J.L.T., DELEZIE, E., RODENBURG, T.B., KEMPEN, I., ZOONS, J., AMPE, B. and TUYTTENS, F.A.M. (2016) Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems. Poultry Science 95: 482-488.
HEMSWORTH, P.H., MELLOR, D.J., CRONIN, G.M. and TILBROOK, A.J. (2015) Scientific assessment of animal welfare. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 63: 24-30.
HESTER, P.Y. (2014) The effect of perches installed in cages on laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 70: 247-264.
HUBER-EICHER, B. and SEBÖ, F. (2001) Reducing feather pecking when raising laying hen chicks in aviary systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73: 59-68.
HUGHES, B.O. and DUNCAN, I.J.H. (1988) The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivation and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour 36: 1696-1707.
HUGHES, B.O., DUNCAN, I.J.H. and BROWN, M.F. (1989) The performance of nest building by domestic hens: is it more important than the construction of a nest? Animal Behaviour 37: 210-214.
HUGHES, B.O. and GENTLE, M.J. (1995) Beak trimming of poultry: its implications for welfare. World's Poultry Science Journal 51: 51-61.
JANCZAK, A.M. and RIBER, A.B. (2015) Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens. Poultry Science 94: 1454-1469.
JIANG, S., HESTER, P.Y., HU, J.Y., YAN, F.F., DENNIS, R.L. and CHENG, H.W. (2014) Effect of perches on liver health of hens. Poultry Science 93:1618-1622.
KAUFMAN-BART, M.H. and HOOP, R.K. (2009) Diseases in chicks and laying hens during the first 12 years after battery cages were banned in Switzerland. The Veterinary Record 164: 203-207.
KJAER, J.B. and BESSEI, W. (2013) The interrelationships of nutrition and feather pecking in the domestic fowl - a review. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 77: 1-9.
KNIERIM, U. (2006) Animal welfare aspects of outdoor runs for laying hens: a review. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 54: 133-145.
LAY, D.C., FULTON, R.M., HESTER, P.Y., KARCHER, D.M., KJAER, J.B., MENCH, J., MULLENS, B.A., NEWBERRY, R.C., NICOL, C.J., O'SULLIVAN, N.P. and PORTER, R.E. (2011) Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poultry Science 90: 278-294.
LAYWEL (2006) LayWel - Overall strengths and weaknesses of each defined housing system for laying hens, and detailing the overall welfare impact of each housing system.
LEONE, E.H. and ESTEVEZ, I. (2008) Use of space in the domestic fowl: separating the effects of enclosure size, group size and density. Animal Behaviour 76: 1673-1682.
MARTIN, M. (2011) Biosecurity and disease control - the problems defined, in: OWEN, R.L. (Ed.) A Practical Guide for Managing Risk in Poultry Production, pp.1-11 (American Association of Avian Pathologists, Jacksonville, North Carolina, USA).
MCADIE, T. and KEELING, L. (2000) Effect of manipulating feathers of laying hens on the incidence of feather pecking and cannibalism. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 215-229.
MELLOR, D. (2013) Setting the scene: When coping is not enough: promoting positive welfare states in animals. Proceedings of the 2013 RSPCA Australia Scientific Seminar. When coping is not enough: promoting positive welfare states in animals, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 26 February 2013, pp.2-13.
MELLOR, D.J. (2016) Updating animal welfare thinking: moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “a life worth living”. Animals 6: 1-20.
MELLOR, D. and BEAUSOLEIL, N. (2015) Extending the ‘Five Domains’ model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Animal Welfare 24: 241-253.
MELLOR, D.J. and REID, C.S.W. (1994) Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals, in: BAKER, R., JENKIN, G. & MELLOR, D.J. (Eds) Improving the well-being of animals in the research environment, pp. 3-18 (Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching: Glen Osmond, SA, Australia).
MELLOR, D.J. and WEBSTER, J.R. (2014) Development of animal welfare understanding drives change in minimum welfare standards. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 33: 121-130.
NEWBERRY, R.C. (2004) Cannibalism, in: PERRY, G.C. (Ed.) Welfare of the Laying Hen, pp. 239-259 (CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK).
NICOL, C.J. (1987) Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Animal Behaviour 35: 1709-1719.
OLSSON, I.A.S. and KEELING, L.J. (2002) The push-door for measuring motivation in hens: Laying hens are motivated to perch at night. Animal Welfare 11: 11-19.
OLSSON, I.A.S. and KEELING, L.J. (2005) Why in earth? Dustbathing behaviour in jungle and domestic fowl reviewed from a Tinbergian and animal welfare perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93: 259-282.
PICKEL, T., SCHRADER, L. and SCHOLZ, B. (2011) Pressure load on keel bone and foot pads in perching laying hens in relation to perch design. Poultry Science 90: 715-724.
POTZSCH, C.J., LEWIS, K., NICOL, C.J. and GREEN, L.E. (2001) A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of vent pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with feather pecking, management and disease. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 74: 259-272.
RODENBURG, T.B., TUYTTENS, F.A.M., DE REU, K., HERMAN, L., ZOONS, J. and SONCK, B. (2008) Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: an on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare 17: 363-373.
RODENBURG, T.B., TUYTTENS, F.A.M., SONCK, B., DE REU, K., HERMAN, L. and and ZOONS, J. (2005) Welfare, health, and hygiene of laying hens housed in furnished cages and in alternative housing systems. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 8: 211-226.
RODENBURG, T.B., VAN KRIMPEN, M.M., DE JONG, I.C., DE HAAS, E.N., KOPS, M.S., RIEDSTRA, B.J., NORDQUIST, R.E., WAGENAAR, J.P., BESTMAN, M. and NICOL, C.J. (2013) The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World's Poultry Science Journal 69: 361-374.
ROMANOV, M.N. and WEIGEND, S. (2001) Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers. Poultry Science 80: 1057-1063.
SAVORY, C. (1995) Feather pecking and cannibalism. World's Poultry Science Journal 51: 215-219.
SCHOLZ, B., KJAER, J.B., PETOW, S. and SCHRADER, L. (2014) Dustbathing in food particles does not remove feather lipids. Poultry Science 93: 1877-1882.
SCOTT, G.B., LAMBE, N.R. and HITCHCOCK, D. (1997) Ability of laying hens to negotiate horizontal perches at different heights, separated by different angles. British Poultry Science 38: 48-54.
SHIMMURA, T., EGUCHI, Y., UETAKE, K. and TANAKA, T. (2008) Comparison of behavior, physical condition and performance of laying hens in four molting methods. Animal Science Journal 79: 129-138.
TAUSON, R. (2005) Management and housing systems for layers - effects on welfare and production. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 61: 477-490.
WEBSTER, A.B. (2004) Welfare implications of avian osteoporosis. Poultry science 83: 184-192.
WEEKS, C.A. and NICOL, C.J. (2006) Behavioural needs, priorities and preferences of laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 62: 296-307.
WEITZENBÜRGER, D., VITS, A., HAMANN, H. and DISTL, O. (2005) Effect of furnished small group housing systems and furnished cages on mortality and causes of death in two layer strains. British Poultry Science 46: 553-559.
WIDOWSKI, T., CLASSEN, H., NEWBERRY, R., PETRIK, M., SCHWEAN-LARDNER, K., COTTEE, S. and COX, B. (2013) Code of practice for the care and handling of pullets, layers and spent fowl: Poultry (layers). Review of scientific research on priority areas.
WIDOWSKI, T.M. and DUNCAN, I.J. (2000) Working for a dustbath: are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 39-53.
WIDOWSKI, T.M., HEMSWORTH, P.H., BARNETT, J.L. and RAULT, J.-L. (2016) Laying hen welfare I. Social environment and space. World's Poultry Science Journal 72: 333-342.
YAN, F.F., HESTER, P.Y. and CHENG, H.W. (2014) The effect of perch access during pullet rearing and egg laying on physiological measures of stress in White Leghorns at 71 weeks of age. Poultry Science 93: 1318-1326.
YUE, S. and DUNCAN, I.J.H. (2003) Frustrated nesting behaviour: relation to extra-cuticular shell calcium and bone strength in White Leghorn hens. British Poultry Science 44: 175-181.
ZIMMERMAN, P.H., KOENE, P. and VAN HOOFF, J.A. (2000) Thwarting of behaviour in different contexts and the gakel-call in the laying hen. Applied Animal behaviour Science 69: 255-264.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The welfare of layer hens in cage and cage-free housing systems

  • K.M. HARTCHER (a1) (a2) and B. JONES (a1) (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.