Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-vkn6t Total loading time: 0.479 Render date: 2022-08-15T01:20:16.088Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Firms’ Integration into Value Chains and Compliance with Adverse WTO Panel Rulings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2017

AYDIN B. YILDIRIM*
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp

Abstract

This article aims to account for the variation in the time it takes for WTO Members to bring compliance following adverse panel rulings. It seeks to answer the question: under what conditions do defendants swiftly implement adverse rulings of WTO panels? I demonstrate that defendants are more likely to comply without delay when the targeted measures involve firms that are integrated into regional and global value chains. When a dispute touches upon the interests of these firms and targets import-restricting measures, they are triggered to mobilize and press for compliance because they rely on foreign imports. In effect, the mobilization of these firms changes the domestic political conditions in favor of timely implementation. I show the plausibility of my argument in a comparative design with four case studies in which the US and Canada acted as defendants in WTO disputes. I control for a number of political factors and also consider legal sources of variation – i.e. the complexity of the form of implementation – that may impact WTO Members’ record of compliance.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Aydin Yildirim 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The previous version of this paper was awarded the Best Graduate Paper in International Law by the International Studies Association. I am indebted to Dirk De Bièvre, Arlo Poletti, Alan Winters, and the two anonymous reviewers for their generous and insightful comments. I also extend my thanks to Henok Asmelash for the discussions we had on the earlier drafts of this paper. I gratefully acknowledge the Research Fund of the University of Antwerp.

References

Amador, J. and Cabral, S. (2014), ‘Global Value Chains Surveying Drivers and Measures’, Working Paper 1739 (2014), European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt.Google Scholar
American Consumers for Affordable Homes (ACAH) (2003), ‘Treatment of Sector 201 Duties and Countervailing Duties’, statement released on 9 October 2003, http://enforcement.trade.gov/download/canada-softwood-lumber/acah-softwood-lumber-cmts.pdf (accessed on 21 March 2016)Google Scholar
Antràs, P. and Helpman, E. (2004), ‘Global Sourcing’, Journal of Political Economy, 112(3): 552580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarPubMed
Baccini, L., Pinto, P., and Weymouth, D. (forthcoming), ‘The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: Firm-Level Evidence’, International Organization.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. (2012), Global Supply Chains: Why They Emerged, Why They Matter, and Where They Are Going’, Working Paper 2012–01, Fung Global Institute, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, A. (2001), ‘Statement on the Amendment of the Patent Act’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce, 21 March, Canadian Senate, Ottowa.Google Scholar
Belzile, A. (2003), ‘Statement on the World Trade Organization's Decision on the Canadian Dairy Export Policy’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 18 March, Ottowa.Google Scholar
Bernard, A. and Jensen, B. (1995), ‘Exporters, Jobs, and Wages in US Manufacturing: 1976–1987’, in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 67119.Google Scholar
Bown, C. (2004), ‘On the economic success of GATT/WTO dispute settlement’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(3): 811823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewster, R. and Chilton, A. (2014), ‘Supplying Compliance: Why and When the United States Complies with WTO Rulings’, Yale Journal of International Law, 39(2): 201246.Google Scholar
Briggs, J., Laaksonen-Craig, S., Niquidet, K., and van Kooten, C. (2005), ‘Resolving Canada–US Trade Disputes in Agriculture and Forestry: Lessons from Lumber’, University of Victoria Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group Working Paper 2005-03.Google Scholar
Burney, I. (2003), ‘Statement on the World Trade Organization's Decision on the Canadian Dairy Export Policy’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 18 March, Ottowa.Google Scholar
Bush, G. (2002), ‘Announcement on the Temporary Safeguards for the Steel Industry’, United States White House Office of the Press Secretary, https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/steel/.Google Scholar
Charron, M. (2005), ‘Lumber I to IV. History of the Canada–US Softwood Lumber Dispute’, Canadian Parliamentary Research Service report TIPS-134E published on19 December 2005.Google Scholar
Chayes, A. and Chayes, A. Handler, (1993), ‘On compliance’, International Organization, 47(2): 175205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudoin, S., Kucik, J., and Pelc, K. (2016), ‘Do WTO Disputes Actually Increase Trade?’, International Studies Quarterly, advanced online publication, http://isq.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/04/15/isq.sqw009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition (CITAC) (2002), ‘Statement “Tariff Exclusion Process Will Not Solve Steel Consumers' Struggles”’, 4 December 2002.Google Scholar
Coukell, G. (2003), ‘Statement on the World Trade Organization's decision on the Canadian Dairy Export Policy’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 18 March, Ottowa.Google Scholar
Cox, T., Le Roy, D., and Goddard, E. (2001), ‘Dairy Disputes in North America: A Case Study’, in Loyns, R. M. A., Meilke, K., Knutson, R. D., and Yunez-Naude, A. (eds.), Trade Liberalization under NAFTA: Report Card on Agriculture, Proceedings of the Sixth Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, March 2000, San Diego, pp. 253–282.Google Scholar
Curran, L. (2015), ‘The Impact of Trade Policy on Global Production Networks: The Solar Panel Case’, Review of International Political Economy, 22(5): 10251054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, W. J. (2005), ‘Evaluating WTO Dispute Settlement: What Results Have Been Achieved Through Consultations and Implementation of Panel Reports?’, Research Paper 05-19, College of Law, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. and Moore, M. (2014), ‘Footloose and duty-free? Reflections on European Union – Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Footwear from China’, World Trade Review, 13(2): 149178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, J. (2013), ‘EU Unilateral Trade Policy-Making: What Role for Import-Dependent Firms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6): 9891005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, J. and Poletti, A. (2016), ‘The Politics of Global Value Chains: Import Dependent Firms and EU–Asia Trade Agreements’, Journal of European Public Policy, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1085073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckhardt, J. and Elsig, M. (2015), ‘Support for International Trade Law: The US and the EU Compared’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(4): 966986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fearon, J. (1994), ‘Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes’, The American Political Science Review, 88(3): 577592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fergusson, I. (2011), ‘United States–Canada Trade and Economic Relationship: Prospects and Challenges’, US Congressional Research Service report RL33087, (accessed 2 March 2016).Google Scholar
Francois, J. and Baughman, L. (2001), ‘Estimated Economic Effects of Proposed Import Relief Remedies for Steel’, Report Prepared by Trade Partnership Worldwide LLC, http://tradepartnership.com/reports/estimated-economic-effects-of-proposed-import-relief-remedies-for-steel-2001/.Google Scholar
Gifford, D. (2004), ‘Government Policy Towards Innovation in the United States, Canada, and the European Union as Manifested in Patent, Copyright, and Competition Laws’, University of Minnesota Law School SMU Law Review paper 1339 (2004), http://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/333.Google Scholar
Gilligan, M. (1997), ‘Lobbying as a Private Good with Intra-Industry Trade’, International Studies Quarterly, 41: 455474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J. and Martin, L. L. (2000), ‘Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note’, International Organization, 54(3): 603632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, A. (2003), Speech given at the ‘Economic Outlook’ hearing before the Joint Economic Committee of the United States Congress, 21 May 2003.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1994), ‘Protection for Sale’, The American Economic Review, 84(4): 833850.Google Scholar
Gschwend, T. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2007), Research Design in Political Science, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A. and Simmons, B. (2002), ‘To Settle or Empanel? An Empirical Analysis of Litigation and Settlement at the WTO’, Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1): 205235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, E., Melitz, M., and Yeaple, S. (2004), ‘Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms’, The American Economic Review, 94(1): 300316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, L. (1968), How Nations Behave, Washington, DC: Council on Foreign Relations Publications.Google Scholar
Jensen, B., Quinn, D., and Weymouth, S. (2015), ‘The Influence of Firm Global Supply Chains and Foreign Currency Undervaluations on US Trade Disputes’, International Organization, 69: 913947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, B., Quinn, D., and Weymouth, S. (2013), ‘Global Supply Chains, Currency Undervaluation, and Firm Protectionist Demands’, Working Paper 19239, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, (accessed 17 September 2015).Google Scholar
Jordan, M. (2005), ‘The Politics of Drug Patenting in Canada’, Masters dissertation, University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keon, J. (2001), ‘Statement on the amendment of the Patent Act’, Speech, House of Commons Standing Committee on Industry, Science, and Technology, 17 May, Ottowa.Google Scholar
Kim, I. S. (forthcoming) ‘Political Cleavages within Industry: Firm level lobbying for Trade Liberalization’, American Political Science Review, http://www.princeton.edu/~insong/research/exporters.pdf.Google Scholar
Kim, I. S., Milner, H., Bernauer, T., Osgood, I., Spilker, G., and Tingley, D. (2016), ‘Firms' Preferences over Multidimensional Trade Policies: Global Production Chains, Investment Protection and Dispute Settlement Mechanisms’, Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), http://web.mit.edu/insong/www/pdf/conjoint.pdf.Google Scholar
Kim, S. Y. (2015), ‘Regionalization in Search of Regionalism: Production Networks and Deep Integration Commitments in Asia's PTAs’, in Dür, A. and Elsig, M. (eds.), The Purpose, Design, and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krikorian, J. (2005), ‘Planes, Trains and Automobiles: The Impact of the WTO “Court” on Canada in Its First Ten Years’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8(4), 921975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanz, R. and Miroudot, S. (2011), ‘Intra-Firm Trade: Patterns, Determinants and Policy Implications’, Working Paper 114, Trade Policy Papers, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/trade/intra-firm-trade_5kg9p39lrwnn-en (accessed 12 April 2016).Google Scholar
Leuliette, T. (2003), ‘Impact of the Section 201 Safeguard Action on Certain Steel Products’, Speech given before the US House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade, 26 March.Google Scholar
Lexchin, J. (2005), ‘Intellectual Property Rights and the Canadian Pharmaceutical Marketplace: Where Do We Go From Here?’, International Journal of Health Service, 35(2): 237256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lexchin, J. (2001), ‘Globalization, Trade Deals, and Drugs: Heads the industry wins tails Canada loses’, Canada Centre for Policy Alternatives Briefing Paper, 2(8). November 2001.Google Scholar
Lobby Canada (2001), ‘Registration and Organization Information: Rx&D’, Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada, (accessed 21 April 2017).Google Scholar
Manger, M. (2012), ‘Vertical Trade Specialization and the Formation of North–South PTAs’, World Politics, 64(4): 622658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, E., Milner, H., and Rosendorff, P. (2002), ‘Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements’, International Organization, 56(3), 477513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, P. (2012), ‘On Compliance in the WTO: Enforcement among Unequal Disputants’, Briefing Paper No. 4, CUTS International, Geneva.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. (2000), ‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place’, European Journal of International Law, 11(4): 763813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melitz, M. (2003), ‘The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity’, Econometrica, 71(6): 16951725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, H. and Moravcsik, A. (2009), Power, Interdependence, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Orefice, G. and Rocha, N. (2014), ‘Deep Integration and Production Networks: An Empirical Analysis’, The World Economy, 37(1): 106136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, I. (2016), ‘The Breakdown of Industrial Opposition to Trade: Firms, Product Variety and Reciprocal Liberalization’, World Politics, DOI: .Google Scholar
Osgood, I., Tingley, D., Bernauer, T., Milner, H. V., and Spilker, G. (2016), ‘The Charmed Life of Superstar Exporters: Firms and Trade Policy in Costa Rica’, Journal of Politics, 79(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/687207.Google Scholar
Park, A. (1999), ‘Examination of Canada's Trade Objectives and the Forthcoming Agenda of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 25 March, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. (2000), ‘Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach’, American Journal of International Law, 94(2): 335347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, T. and Thies, C. (2011), ‘Intra-industry Trade, Veto Players, and the Formation of Preferential Trade Agreements’, Unpublished manuscript, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266607811_Intra-industry_Trade_Veto_Players_and_the_Formation_of_Preferential_Trade_Agreements (accessed 27 April 2017).Google Scholar
Poletti, A. and De Bièvre, D. (2014), ‘Political Mobilization, Veto Players, and WTO Litigation: Explaining European Union Responses in Trade Disputes’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8):11811198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Producteurs de lait du Québec (PLQ) (2013), ‘2013 Annual Report: 30 Years, Proud of Our Collective Achievements’, On file with author.Google Scholar
Producteurs de lait du Québec (PLQ) (2000), ‘Annual Report: Training and Information’, On file with author.Google Scholar
Read, R. (2005), ‘The EU–US WTO Steel Dispute: Political Economy of Protection and the Efficacy of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding’, in Perdikis, N. and Read, R., The WTO and the Regulation of International Trade: Recent Trade Disputes Between the European Union and the United States, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 135175.Google Scholar
Reif, L. (2007), ‘Desperate Softwood Lumber Companies? The Canada–US Softwood Lumber Dispute and NAFTA Chapter 11’, Alberta Law Review, 45(2): 357380.Google Scholar
Saint-Jacques, J. (2000), ‘Information Session on the Canadian Dairy Exports under the World Trade Organization (WTO)’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 24 February, Ottowa.Google Scholar
Sattler, T., Spilker, G., and Bernauer, T. (2015), ‘Does WTO Dispute Settlement Enforce or Inform?’, British Journal of Political Science, 44(4): 877902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, G. (2003), Defending Interests: Public–Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Spilker, G. (2012), ‘Compliance with WTO Dispute Rulings’, Working Paper 2011–25, National Centre of Competence in Research Trade Regulation, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Stephenson, S. (2013), ‘Global Value Chains: The New Reality of International Trade’, Overview paper prepared for the E15 Expert Group on Global Value Chains: Development Challenges and Policy Options, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Tomz, M. (2007), ‘Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach’, International Organization, 61(4): 821840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports (USLC) (2003), ‘Canadian Lumber Proposal Warrants Further Discussion’, Statement released on 31 July.Google Scholar
United States Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports (USLC) (2002), ‘WTO: Canadian Subsidies Exist, Subsidy to be Recalculated’, Statement released on 27 September.Google Scholar
United States Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports (USLC) (2002a), ‘US Lumber Industry Seeks Negotiated Offset to Unfair Trade’, Statement released on 17 December 2002.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2001), ‘Canada's Subsidized Dairy Exports: The Issue of WTO Compliance’, Special article prepared by Economic Research Service, August 2001, On file with author.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2000), ‘Canadian Dairy Industry Spokesman Speculates New Dairy Regime Won't Be WTO Compliant’, Global Agricultural Information Network Report CA0124, August 2000, On file with author.Google Scholar
United States International Trade Commission (USITC) (2003), ‘Steel-Consuming Industries: Competitive Conditions with Respect to Steel Safeguard Measures’, Investigation No. 332452.Google Scholar
United States International Trade Commission (USITC) (2001), ‘Determinations Concerning Impact of Imports of Steel on US Industry’, 23 October, https://www.usitc.gov/press_room/news_release/2001/er1023y1.pdf.Google Scholar
Verheul, S. (2003), ‘Statement on the World Trade Organization's decision on the Canadian dairy export policy’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 18 March, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Vinet, S. (2000), ‘Information Session on the Canadian Dairy Exports under the World Trade Organization (WTO)’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 24 February, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. (2007), ‘Compliance by WTO Members with Adverse WTO Dispute Settlement Rulings: The Record to Date’, Journal of International Economic Law, 10(2): 397403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yildirim, A. (2016), ‘Domestic Political Implications of Global Value Chains: Explaining EU Responses to Litigation at the World Trade Organization’, Comparative European Politics, DOI:10.1057/s41295-016-0085-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. (2010), ‘Effective Multilateralism on Trial: EU Compliance with WTO Law', in Blavoukos, S. and Bourantonis, D. (eds.), The EU's Presence in International Organisations, European Union Series: Routledge Advances in European Politics (67), Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 114131.Google Scholar
Zangl, B. (2008), ‘Judicialization Matters! A Comparison of Dispute Settlement Under GATT and the WTO’, International Studies Quarterly, 52(4): 825854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D. (2007), The Softwood Lumber War: Politics, Economics, and the Long US–Canadian Trade Dispute, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. and Laband, D. (2003), ‘From Senators to the President: Solve the Lumber Problem or Else’, Public Choice, 123(3): 393410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoellick, R. (2003), ‘Press Briefing by US Trade Representative Zoellick on Ending the Temporary Steel Safeguards’, The White House Office of the Press Secretary, Washington, DC, http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2003/12/20031204164450yessedo0.718197.html#ixzz45cv7YfiB (accessed 12 April 2016).Google Scholar
4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Firms’ Integration into Value Chains and Compliance with Adverse WTO Panel Rulings
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Firms’ Integration into Value Chains and Compliance with Adverse WTO Panel Rulings
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Firms’ Integration into Value Chains and Compliance with Adverse WTO Panel Rulings
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *