Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T02:06:03.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Under Pressure: Intractable Trade Conflicts and Korea – Pneumatic Valves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2021

Kristy Buzard*
Economics Department, Syracuse University
Kathleen Claussen
University of Miami School of Law


The Appellate Body (AB) report in Korea–Pneumatic Valves is among the most structurally complex of recent trade remedies reports. The AB weaves a complicated web to explicate the intricacies of the relationship among the relevant provisions on injury determination in anti-dumping disputes in the midst of a contentious and long-running series of disputes between two close regional trading powers. This Article first examines the Korean investigation and its significance in economic terms. Second, it analyzes the AB's conclusions on Article 6.2 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding regarding the panel request and the significance of the AB's treatment. Third, it studies the AB's comments on the panel's anti-dumping calculations where the AB amplifies its prior pronouncements on the elements of injury and causation. Finally, the Article situates this dispute in the broader political debates playing out both at the AB and between the two disputing parties.

Original Article
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (Anti-dumping Agreement) (LT/TR/A/1), 12 April 1979.Google Scholar
Bloomberg, ‘TPC Mechatronics Corp – Company Profile and News’,, accessed 17 October 2020.Google Scholar
Chilton, A. and Beshkar, M. (2016) ‘Revisiting Procedure and Precedent in the WTO: An Analysis of US – Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Measures (China)’, World Trade Review 15(2), 375395.Google Scholar
JoongAng Daily (2020) ‘KCC Stocks Rise After Everland IPO revealed’,, accessed 17 October 2020.Google Scholar
Kwon, Y. (2014) ‘South Korea's Free Trade Dilemma’, The Diplomat, retrieved from Scholar
Maizland, L. (2019) ‘The Japan-Korea Trade Dispute: What to Know’, Council on Foreign Relations, Scholar
METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) (2020), ‘Korea's Anti-Dumping Duties on Pneumatic Valves from Japan were Eliminated’, 19 August 2020.Google Scholar
Monicken, H. (2019) ‘US Objects to Chinese Retaliation Request at WTO, Criticizes Appellate Body Interpretation’, Inside US Trade.Google Scholar
National Fluid Power Association (2020) ‘What is Pneumatics’,, accessed 10 September 2020.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1997) ‘Maximizing US Interests in Science and Technology Relations with Japan’, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nikkei Asia (2019) ‘South Korea Digs In Its Heels on Japan Tariffs after WTO Ruling’, 2 October 2019.Google Scholar
Reuters (2019) ‘WTO Top Court Backs Japan in Case against South Korea Duties’, 10 September 2019.Google Scholar
The Economist (2019) ‘Chemical Corrosion; Banyan’.Google Scholar
Tillett, A. (2020) ‘Push for Japan, Korea to Join Breakaway Trade Disputes Body’, Financial Review.Google Scholar
Visualizing Korea (2020) ‘Korea and Japan Trade War: Locked in Unequal Relationship and How to Overcome It’,, accessed 24 October 2020.Google Scholar
Yonhap News Agency (2019) ‘WTO Finalizes Ruling on S. Korea–Japan Anti-Dumping Dispute Over Pneumatic valves’, 30 September 2019.Google Scholar