Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Appellate Body Report, India – Additional and Extra-Additional Duties on Imports from the United States (WT/DS360/AB/R, adopted on 17 November 2008)

  • PAOLA CONCONI (a1) and Jan Wouters (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

This paper critically reviews the main findings of the Appellate Body in the case India – Additional and Extra-Additional Duties on Imports from the United States (India–Additional Import Duties). This ruling sheds light on the interplay between two core provisions of the GATT, namely Article II GATT (Schedules of Concessions) and III GATT (National Treatment on Internal Taxation and Regulation). Linked to this demarcation, the question on the allocation of the burden of proof was a central point of contention in this dispute. The ruling also establishes the principle that WTO Members are allowed to use border tax adjustments, as long as the tax imposed on imports does not exceed the domestic tax. We argue that this principle can help to reconcile the objectives of the WTO with those of national governments.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: jan.wouters@ggs.kuleuven.be
References
Hide All
Bagwell Kyle and Staiger Robert W. (2001), ‘Domestic Policies, National Sovereignty, and International Economic Institutions’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116: 519562.
Conconi Paola and Perroni Carlo (2002), ‘Issue Linkage and Issue Tie-in in Multilateral Negotiations’, Journal of International Economics, 57: 423447.
Conconi Paola and Perroni Carlo (2005), ‘Conditionality, Separation, and Open Rules in Multilateral Institutions’, in Choi E. Kwan and Hartigan James C. (eds.), Handbook of International Trade: The Economic and Legal Analysis of Trade Policy and Institutions, Volume II, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Ederington Josh (2001), ‘International Coordination of Trade and Domestic Policies’, American Economic Review, 91: 15801593.
Grando Michelle T. (2006), ‘Allocating the Burden of Proof in WTO Disputes: A Critical Analysis’, Journal of International Economic Law, 9: 615656.
Horn Henrik (2006), ‘National Treatment in the GATT’, American Economic Review, 96: 394404.
Horn Henrik and Mavroidis Petros C. (2004), ‘Still Hazy after All These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case-Law on Tax Discrimination’, European Journal of International Law, 15: 3969.
Piérola Fernando (2009), ‘The Appellate Body Report in India – Additional and Extra-Additional Duties on Imports from the United States (DS 360) – Implications with Respect to the Interpretation of Article II and the Burden of Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’, Global Trade and Customs Journal, 4: 9798.
Poterba James M. and Rotemberg Julio J. (1995), ‘Environmental Taxes on Intermediate and Final Goods When Both Can Be Imported’, International Tax and Public Finance, 2: 221228.
Sraffa Piero (ed.), with M. H. Dobb (1951), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. IV, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 29 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 364 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.