Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W. (2001), ‘Domestic Policies, National Sovereignty, and International Economic Institutions’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116: 519–562.
Conconi, Paola and Perroni, Carlo (2002), ‘Issue Linkage and Issue Tie-in in Multilateral Negotiations’, Journal of International Economics, 57: 423–447.
Conconi, Paola and Perroni, Carlo (2005), ‘Conditionality, Separation, and Open Rules in Multilateral Institutions’, in Choi, E. Kwan and Hartigan, James C. (eds.), Handbook of International Trade: The Economic and Legal Analysis of Trade Policy and Institutions, Volume II, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Ederington, Josh (2001), ‘International Coordination of Trade and Domestic Policies’, American Economic Review, 91: 1580–1593.
Grando, Michelle T. (2006), ‘Allocating the Burden of Proof in WTO Disputes: A Critical Analysis’, Journal of International Economic Law, 9: 615–656.
Horn, Henrik (2006), ‘National Treatment in the GATT’, American Economic Review, 96: 394–404.
Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (2004), ‘Still Hazy after All These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case-Law on Tax Discrimination’, European Journal of International Law, 15: 39–69.
Piérola, Fernando (2009), ‘The Appellate Body Report in India – Additional and Extra-Additional Duties on Imports from the United States (DS 360) – Implications with Respect to the Interpretation of Article II and the Burden of Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’, Global Trade and Customs Journal, 4: 97–98.
Poterba, James M. and Rotemberg, Julio J. (1995), ‘Environmental Taxes on Intermediate and Final Goods When Both Can Be Imported’, International Tax and Public Finance, 2: 221–228.
Sraffa, Piero (ed.), with M. H. Dobb (1951), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. IV, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.