Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The ‘Development’ Discourse in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking


The impact of the idea of ‘development’ in multilateral trade lawmaking is often reduced to the principle of ‘special and differential treatment’, which exempts developing countries from certain obligations imposed by the trade regime. The article shows that ‘development’ has always presented a much wider challenge to the vision of the trade regime championed by the major trading nations. The development discourse has conceived the trade regime's historical significance, the regime's aims, and the relationships among its members in ways that were often fundamentally at odds with the conception preferred by most developed countries. The article explores how the development discourse has informed lawmaking initiatives by developing countries throughout the history of the trade regime. While not all of these initiatives were successful or necessarily fruitful, they show that the pursuit of development in trade lawmaking has always been more than an effort to seek exemption from trade rules.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C. M. Andrews (1914), ‘Colonial Commerce’, American Historical Review, 20(1): 4363.

B. Balassa (1965), ‘Tariff Protection in Industrial Countries: An Evaluation’, Journal of Political Economy, 73(6): 573594.

L. Barnes (1938), ‘The Empire as Sacred Trust: The Problem of Africa’, Political Quarterly, 9(4): 503515.

M. Brigg (2002), ‘Post-Development, Foucault and the Colonisation Metaphor’, Third World Quarterly, 23(3): 421436.

W. M. Corden (1966), ‘The Structure of a Tariff System and the Effective Protective Rate’, Journal of Political Economy, 74(3): 221237.

K. W. Dam (2005), ‘Cordell Hull, the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act, and the WTO’, in Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (ed.), Reforming the World Trading System. Legitimacy, Efficiency, and Democratic Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 8396.

J. W. Evans (1971), The Kennedy Round in American Trade Policy: The Twilight of the GATT, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rt. Hon. Lord Marley (1938), ‘The Empire as an Economic Unit’, Political Quarterly, 9(4): 529540.

A. Mitchell (2006), ‘A Legal Principle of Special and Differential Treatment for WTO Disputes’, World Trade Review, 5(3): 445469.

J. Pauwelyn (2013), ‘The End of Differential Treatment for Developing Countries? Lessons from the Trade and Climate Change Regimes’, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 22(1): 2941.

S. Prozorov (2011), ‘The Other as Past and Present: Beyond the Logic of ‘Temporal Othering’ in IR Theory’, Review of International Studies, 37(3): 12731293.

S. E. Rolland (2012), Development at the World Trade Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

J. Scott (2010), ‘Developing Countries in the ITO and GATT Negotiations’, Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 9(1): 524.

R. Toye (2003), ‘The Attlee Government, the Imperial Preference System, and the Creation of the GATT’, English Historical Review, 118(478): 912939.

R. Wilkinson and J. Scott (2008), ‘Developing Country Participation in the GATT: A Reassessment’, World Trade Review, 7(3): 473510.

R. Wolfe (2015), ‘First Diagnose, Then Treat: What Ails the Doha Round?’, World Trade Review, 14(1): 728.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 56 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 162 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd March 2017 - 27th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.