Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The ‘Development’ Discourse in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking

  • NICOLAS LAMP (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The impact of the idea of ‘development’ in multilateral trade lawmaking is often reduced to the principle of ‘special and differential treatment’, which exempts developing countries from certain obligations imposed by the trade regime. The article shows that ‘development’ has always presented a much wider challenge to the vision of the trade regime championed by the major trading nations. The development discourse has conceived the trade regime's historical significance, the regime's aims, and the relationships among its members in ways that were often fundamentally at odds with the conception preferred by most developed countries. The article explores how the development discourse has informed lawmaking initiatives by developing countries throughout the history of the trade regime. While not all of these initiatives were successful or necessarily fruitful, they show that the pursuit of development in trade lawmaking has always been more than an effort to seek exemption from trade rules.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The ‘Development’ Discourse in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The ‘Development’ Discourse in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The ‘Development’ Discourse in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: Nicolas.Lamp@queensu.ca.
References
Hide All
AlessandriniD. (2010), Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trade Regime. The Failure and Promise of the WTO's Development Mission, Oxford/Portland: Hart.
AndrewsC. M. (1914), ‘Colonial Commerce’, American Historical Review, 20(1): 4363.
BalassaB. (1965), ‘Tariff Protection in Industrial Countries: An Evaluation’, Journal of Political Economy, 73(6): 573594.
BarnesL. (1938), ‘The Empire as Sacred Trust: The Problem of Africa’, Political Quarterly, 9(4): 503515.
BriggM. (2002), ‘Post-Development, Foucault and the Colonisation Metaphor’, Third World Quarterly, 23(3): 421436.
BrownW. A. (1950), The United States and the Restoration of World Trade: An Analysis and Appraisal of the ITO Charter and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
CordenW. M. (1966), ‘The Structure of a Tariff System and the Effective Protective Rate’, Journal of Political Economy, 74(3): 221237.
DamK. W. (2005), ‘Cordell Hull, the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act, and the WTO’, in Petersmann Ernst-Ulrich (ed.), Reforming the World Trading System. Legitimacy, Efficiency, and Democratic Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 8396.
EscobarA. J. (1995), Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
EvansJ. W. (1971), The Kennedy Round in American Trade Policy: The Twilight of the GATT, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
FRUS (1945a), ‘The Ambassador in the United Kingdom (Winant) to the Secretary of State’ (Jan. 5, 1945), in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Volume VI, pp. 35.
FRUS (1945b), ‘The Ambassador in the United Kingdom (Winant) to the Secretary of State’ (Jan. 4, 1945), in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Volume VI, pp. 13.
FRUS (1945c), ‘The Ambassador in the United Kingdom (Winant) to the Secretary of State’ (Apr. 21, 1945), in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Volume VI, pp. 3336.
FRUS (1945d), ‘The Ambassador in the United Kingdom (Winant) to the Secretary of State’ (Feb. 8, 1945), in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Volume VI, pp. 1921.
FRUS (1945e), ‘The Secretary of State to the Ambassador in the United Kingdom (Winant)’ (Aug. 9, 1945), in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Volume VI, pp. 8890.
FRUS (1945f), ‘The Acting Secretary of State to the Ambassador in the United Kingdom (Winant)’ (Oct. 2, 1945), in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Volume VI, p. 137.
FRUS (1945g), ‘The Acting Secretary of State to the Ambassador in the United Kingdom (Winant)’ (Oct. 2, 1945), in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Volume VI, p. 138.
FRUS (1945h), ‘The Ambassador in the United Kingdom (Winant) to the Secretary of State’ (June 28, 1945), in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Volume VI, pp. 5660.
GardnerR. N. (1969), Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy. The Origins and the Prospects of Our International Economic Order, New York: McGraw-Hill.
GATT (1952), ‘Proposal by the French Delegation Amending and Supplementing the French Plan with a View to a General Lowering of Tariff Levels’ (Nov. 6, 1952), L/58.
GATT (1961), ‘Committee III on Expansion of Trade: Special Report of Committee III to the Contracting Parties’ (Sept. 27, 1961), L/1557.
GATT (1962), ‘Contracting Parties, Twentieth Session: Committee III – Expansion of Trade. Report of the Examination of the Second Five-Year Plan of Pakistan’ (Nov. 191962), L/1924.
GATT (1964), ‘Trade Negotiations Committee: Report of the Sub-Committee on the Participation of the Less-Developed Countries to the Trade Negotiations Committee’ (Apr. 30, 1964), TN.64/21.
GATT (1966), ‘Committee on Trade and Development, Expert Group on Adjustment Assistance Measures: Report of the Expert Group on Adjustment Assistance Measures’ (Feb. 18, 1966), COM.TD/H/4.
GATT (1969), ‘Committee on Trade and Development: Report of the Expert Group on Adjustment Assistance Measures’ (June 3, 1969), COM.TD/68.
GATT (1973), ‘Tokyo Declaration on Multilateral Trade Negotiations’ (14 September 1973), International Legal Materials, 12(6): 15331535.
GATT (1975), ‘Textiles Committee: Report on Adjustment Assistance Measures’ (Nov. 28, 1975), COM.TEX/W/25.
GATT (1980), ‘Textiles Committee, Working Group on Adjustment Measures: Report by the Working Group on Adjustment Measures’ (June 30, 1980), COM.TEX/16.
GATT (1982), ‘Report of the Working Party on Structural Adjustment and Trade Policy for the Preparatory Committee’ (July 12, 1982), L/5347.
GATT (1983), ‘Working Party on Structural Adjustment and Trade Policy: Report to the Council’ (Oct. 20, 1983), L/5568.
GATT (1984), ‘Consultative Group of Eighteen, Twenty-Fourth Meeting, 5–6 July 1984: Structural Adjustment and Trade Policy’ (June 8, 1984), CG.18/W/83.
GATT (1987a), ‘Group of Negotiations on Services: Communication from Brazil’ (Mar. 11, 1987), MTN.GNS/W/3.
GATT (1987b), ‘Group of Negotiations on Services: Communication from India’ (Mar. 11, 1987), MTN.GNS/W/4.
GATT (1988a), ‘Trade Negotiations Committee, Meeting at Ministerial Level, Montreal (Canada), December 1988: India. Statement by Mr. Dinesh Singh, Minister of Commerce’ (Dec. 6, 1988), MTN.TNC/MIN(88)/ST/25.
GATT (1988b), ‘Contracting Parties, Forty-Fourth Session: India. Statement by H.E. Mr. S.P. Shukla, Ambassador, Permanent Representative’ (Nov. 23, 1988), SR.44/ST/17.
GATT (1993a), ‘Trade Policy Review Mechanism: The Republic of South Africa, Report by the Government’ (May 3, 1993), C/RM/G/37.
GATT (1993b), ‘Council, 1–2 June 1993, Trade Policy Review Mechanism: South Africa, Minutes of Meeting’ (July 9, 1993), C/RM/M/37.
HudecR. E. (1987), Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System, Aldershot/Brookfield/Sydney: Gower Publishing Company.
LampN. (2015), ‘How Some Countries Became ‘Special’: Developing Countries and the Construction of Difference in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking’, Journal of International Economic Law, 18(4): 743771.
LampN. (2016), ‘The Club Approach to Multilateral Trade Lawmaking’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 49(1): 107190.
LeddyJ. M. (1973), ‘Oral History Interview with John M. Leddy’, conducted by Richard D. McKinzie (June 15, 1973), Washington, DC: Harry S. Truman Library and Museum, http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/leddyj.htm (accessed 15 May 2015)
MarleyRt. Hon. Lord (1938), ‘The Empire as an Economic Unit’, Political Quarterly, 9(4): 529540.
McRaeD. M., and Thomas J. C. (1983), ‘The GATT and Multilateral Treaty Making: The Tokyo Round’, American Journal of International Law, 77(1): 5183.
MitchellA. (2006), ‘A Legal Principle of Special and Differential Treatment for WTO Disputes’, World Trade Review, 5(3): 445469.
OxleyA. (1990), The Challenge of Free Trade, New York: St Martin's Press.
PaemenH. and Bensch A. (1995), From the GATT to the WTO: The European Community in the Uruguay Round, Leuven: Leuven University Press.
PauwelynJ. (2013), ‘The End of Differential Treatment for Developing Countries? Lessons from the Trade and Climate Change Regimes’, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 22(1): 2941.
ProzorovS. (2011), ‘The Other as Past and Present: Beyond the Logic of ‘Temporal Othering’ in IR Theory’, Review of International Studies, 37(3): 12731293.
RistG. (2010), The History of Development. From Western Origins to Global Faith, London/New York: Zed Books.
RollandS. E. (2012), Development at the World Trade Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SaidE. W. (1994), Culture and Imperialism, London: Vintage Books.
ScottJ. (2010), ‘Developing Countries in the ITO and GATT Negotiations’, Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 9(1): 524.
SmithiesA. (1947), ‘Multilateral Trade and Employment’, American Economic Review, 37(2): 560568.
TarulloD. K. (1985), ‘Logic, Myth, and the International Economic Order’, Harvard International Law Journal, 26(2): 533552.
ToyeR. (2003), ‘The Attlee Government, the Imperial Preference System, and the Creation of the GATT’, English Historical Review, 118(478): 912939.
TrebilcockM. J., Chandler M. A., and Howse R. (1990), Trade and Transitions: A Comparative Analysis of Adjustment Policies, London/New York: Routledge.
TrebilcockM. J. and Howse R. (2005), The Regulation of International Trade, London/New York: Routledge.
UNCTE (1947), ‘Sixth Committee: Organization: Summary Record of the Fourth Meeting, Held at the Capitol, Havana, Cuba. Thursday 4 December 1947 at 10.30 a.m’ (Dec.4, 1947), E/CONF.2/C.6/SR.4.
UNESC (1946a), ‘Preparatory Committee of the International Conference on Trade and Employment: Verbatim Report of the First Plenary Meeting held at Church House, Westminster, S.W.1. on Tuesday, 15th October, 1946, at 3.0 p.m’ (Oct. 15, 1946), E/PC/T/PV/1.
UNESC (1946b), ‘Preparatory Committee of the International Conference on Trade and Employment: Verbatim Report of the Second Meeting of Joint Committee on Industrial Development held in The Hoare Memorial Hall, Church House, Westminster, S.W.1. on Saturday, 26th October, 1946 at 11 a.m’ (Oct. 26. 1946), E/PC/T/C.I &II/PV/2.
UNESC (1946c), ‘Preparatory Committee of the International Conference on Trade and Employment: Government of India. Department of Commerce. Comments on U.S. Proposals for Expansion of World Trade and Employment’ (Oct. 21. 1946), E/PC/T/W.14 – E/PC/T/5.
UNESC (1946d), ‘Preparatory Committee of the International Conference on Trade and Employment: Report of Joint Committee on Industrial Development’ (Nov. 23, 1946), E/PC/T/23.
UNESC (1946e), ‘Preparatory Committee of the International Conference on Trade and Employment: Verbatim Report of the Third Meeting of Joint Committee on Industrial Development held in The Hoare Memorial Hall, Church House, Westminster, S.W.1. on Tuesday, 29th October, 1946 at 10.30 a.m’ (Oct. 29. 1946), E/PC/T/C.I &II/PV/3.
UNESC (1947a), ‘Second Session of the Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment: Verbatim Report. Twenty-Second Meeting of Commission A. Held on Tuesday, 1 July 1947 at 3.00 P.M. in the Palais des Nations, Geneva’ (Jul. 1, 1947), E/PC/T/A/PV/22.
UNESC (1947b), ‘Second Session of the Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment: Verbatim Report. Twenty-Sixth Meeting of Commission A. Held on Saturday, 5 July 1947 at 10.30 A.M. in the Palais des Nations, Geneva’ (Jul. 5, 1947), E/PC/T/A/PV/26.
UNESC (1947c), ‘Second Session of the Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment: Verbatim Report. Twenty-Second Meeting of Commission A. Held on Tuesday, 2 July 1947 at 11.30 A.M. in the Palais des Nations, Geneva’ (Jul. 2, 1947), E/PC/T/A/PV/23.
United Nations (2008), Handbook on the Least Developed Country Category: Inclusion, Graduation and Special Support Measures, New York: United Nations.
US Department of State (1945), Proposals for Expansion of World Trade and Employment. Developed by a Technical Staff within the Government of the United States in Preparation for an International Conference on Trade and Employment and Presented for Consideration by the Peoples of the World, Washington, DC: Department of State.
US Senate (1947), ‘Hearings before the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, Eightieth Congress, First Session on Trade Agreements System and Proposed International Trade Organization Charter, Part 1, Testimony, March 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 31, April 1, 2, 3, 1947’.
WilkinsonR. and Scott J. (2008), ‘Developing Country Participation in the GATT: A Reassessment’, World Trade Review, 7(3): 473510.
WinhamG. R. (1986), International Trade and the Tokyo Round Negotiation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
WolfE. R. (2010), Europe and the People without History, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
WolfeR. (2015), ‘First Diagnose, Then Treat: What Ails the Doha Round?’, World Trade Review, 14(1): 728.
WTO (2008), ‘Committee on Agriculture, Special Session: Revised Draft Modalities for Agriculture’ (Dec. 6, 2008), TN/AG/W/4/Rev.4.
WTO (2012), ‘Committee on Agriculture: WTO List of Net Food-Importing Developing Countries for the Purposes of the Marrakesh Ministerial Decision on Measures Concerning the Possible Negative Effects of the Reform Programme on Least Developed and Net Food-Importing Developing Countries (‘The Decision’) Revision’ (Mar. 23, 2012), G/AG/5/Rev.10.
WTO (2013), ‘Appointment of the Next Director-General: Informal General Council Meeting at the Level of Heads of Delegation. Friday 12 April, 3 p.m., Council Room, Statement by the Chairman’ (Apr. 12, 2013), JOB/GC/40.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 209 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 385 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd March 2017 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.