Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Firms’ Integration into Value Chains and Compliance with Adverse WTO Panel Rulings

  • AYDIN B. YILDIRIM (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This article aims to account for the variation in the time it takes for WTO Members to bring compliance following adverse panel rulings. It seeks to answer the question: under what conditions do defendants swiftly implement adverse rulings of WTO panels? I demonstrate that defendants are more likely to comply without delay when the targeted measures involve firms that are integrated into regional and global value chains. When a dispute touches upon the interests of these firms and targets import-restricting measures, they are triggered to mobilize and press for compliance because they rely on foreign imports. In effect, the mobilization of these firms changes the domestic political conditions in favor of timely implementation. I show the plausibility of my argument in a comparative design with four case studies in which the US and Canada acted as defendants in WTO disputes. I control for a number of political factors and also consider legal sources of variation – i.e. the complexity of the form of implementation – that may impact WTO Members’ record of compliance.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: aydin.yildirim@uantwerpen.be.
Footnotes
Hide All

The previous version of this paper was awarded the Best Graduate Paper in International Law by the International Studies Association. I am indebted to Dirk De Bièvre, Arlo Poletti, Alan Winters, and the two anonymous reviewers for their generous and insightful comments. I also extend my thanks to Henok Asmelash for the discussions we had on the earlier drafts of this paper. I gratefully acknowledge the Research Fund of the University of Antwerp.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
AmadorJ. and Cabral S. (2014), ‘Global Value Chains Surveying Drivers and Measures’, Working Paper 1739 (2014), European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt.
American Consumers for Affordable Homes (ACAH) (2003), ‘Treatment of Sector 201 Duties and Countervailing Duties’, statement released on 9 October 2003, http://enforcement.trade.gov/download/canada-softwood-lumber/acah-softwood-lumber-cmts.pdf (accessed on 21 March 2016)
AntràsP. and Helpman E. (2004), ‘Global Sourcing’, Journal of Political Economy, 112(3): 552580.
AxelrodR. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books.
BacciniL., Pinto P., and Weymouth D. (forthcoming), ‘The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: Firm-Level Evidence’, International Organization.
BaldwinR. (2012), Global Supply Chains: Why They Emerged, Why They Matter, and Where They Are Going’, Working Paper 2012–01, Fung Global Institute, Hong Kong.
BaumgartnerA. (2001), ‘Statement on the Amendment of the Patent Act’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce, 21 March, Canadian Senate, Ottowa.
BelzileA. (2003), ‘Statement on the World Trade Organization's Decision on the Canadian Dairy Export Policy’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 18 March, Ottowa.
BernardA. and Jensen B. (1995), ‘Exporters, Jobs, and Wages in US Manufacturing: 1976–1987’, in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 67119.
BownC. (2004), ‘On the economic success of GATT/WTO dispute settlement’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(3): 811823.
BrewsterR. and Chilton A. (2014), ‘Supplying Compliance: Why and When the United States Complies with WTO Rulings’, Yale Journal of International Law, 39(2): 201246.
BriggsJ., Laaksonen-Craig S., Niquidet K., and van Kooten C. (2005), ‘Resolving Canada–US Trade Disputes in Agriculture and Forestry: Lessons from Lumber’, University of Victoria Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group Working Paper 2005-03.
BurneyI. (2003), ‘Statement on the World Trade Organization's Decision on the Canadian Dairy Export Policy’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 18 March, Ottowa.
BushG. (2002), ‘Announcement on the Temporary Safeguards for the Steel Industry’, United States White House Office of the Press Secretary, https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/steel/.
CharronM. (2005), ‘Lumber I to IV. History of the Canada–US Softwood Lumber Dispute’, Canadian Parliamentary Research Service report TIPS-134E published on19 December 2005.
ChayesA. and Chayes A. Handler, (1993), ‘On compliance’, International Organization, 47(2): 175205.
ChaudoinS., Kucik J., and Pelc K. (2016), ‘Do WTO Disputes Actually Increase Trade?’, International Studies Quarterly, advanced online publication, http://isq.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/04/15/isq.sqw009.
Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition (CITAC) (2002), ‘Statement “Tariff Exclusion Process Will Not Solve Steel Consumers' Struggles”’, 4 December 2002.
CoukellG. (2003), ‘Statement on the World Trade Organization's decision on the Canadian Dairy Export Policy’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 18 March, Ottowa.
CoxT., Le Roy D., and Goddard E. (2001), ‘Dairy Disputes in North America: A Case Study’, in Loyns R. M. A., Meilke K., Knutson R. D., and Yunez-Naude A. (eds.), Trade Liberalization under NAFTA: Report Card on Agriculture, Proceedings of the Sixth Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, March 2000, San Diego, pp. 253–282.
CurranL. (2015), ‘The Impact of Trade Policy on Global Production Networks: The Solar Panel Case’, Review of International Political Economy, 22(5): 10251054.
DaveyW. J. (2005), ‘Evaluating WTO Dispute Settlement: What Results Have Been Achieved Through Consultations and Implementation of Panel Reports?’, Research Paper 05-19, College of Law, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.
DunoffJ. and Moore M. (2014), ‘Footloose and duty-free? Reflections on European Union – Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Footwear from China’, World Trade Review, 13(2): 149178.
EckhardtJ. (2013), ‘EU Unilateral Trade Policy-Making: What Role for Import-Dependent Firms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6): 9891005.
EckhardtJ. and Poletti A. (2016), ‘The Politics of Global Value Chains: Import Dependent Firms and EU–Asia Trade Agreements’, Journal of European Public Policy, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1085073.
EckhardtJ. and Elsig M. (2015), ‘Support for International Trade Law: The US and the EU Compared’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(4): 966986.
FearonJ. (1994), ‘Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes’, The American Political Science Review, 88(3): 577592.
FergussonI. (2011), ‘United States–Canada Trade and Economic Relationship: Prospects and Challenges’, US Congressional Research Service report RL33087, (accessed 2 March 2016).
FrancoisJ. and Baughman L. (2001), ‘Estimated Economic Effects of Proposed Import Relief Remedies for Steel’, Report Prepared by Trade Partnership Worldwide LLC, http://tradepartnership.com/reports/estimated-economic-effects-of-proposed-import-relief-remedies-for-steel-2001/.
GiffordD. (2004), ‘Government Policy Towards Innovation in the United States, Canada, and the European Union as Manifested in Patent, Copyright, and Competition Laws’, University of Minnesota Law School SMU Law Review paper 1339 (2004), http://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/333.
GilliganM. (1997), ‘Lobbying as a Private Good with Intra-Industry Trade’, International Studies Quarterly, 41: 455474.
GoldsteinJ. and Martin L. L. (2000), ‘Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note’, International Organization, 54(3): 603632.
GreenspanA. (2003), Speech given at the ‘Economic Outlook’ hearing before the Joint Economic Committee of the United States Congress, 21 May 2003.
GrossmanG. and Helpman E. (1994), ‘Protection for Sale’, The American Economic Review, 84(4): 833850.
GschwendT. and Schimmelfennig F. (2007), Research Design in Political Science, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
GuzmanA. and Simmons B. (2002), ‘To Settle or Empanel? An Empirical Analysis of Litigation and Settlement at the WTO’, Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1): 205235.
HelpmanE., Melitz M., and Yeaple S. (2004), ‘Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms’, The American Economic Review, 94(1): 300316.
HenkinL. (1968), How Nations Behave, Washington, DC: Council on Foreign Relations Publications.
JensenB., Quinn D., and Weymouth S. (2015), ‘The Influence of Firm Global Supply Chains and Foreign Currency Undervaluations on US Trade Disputes’, International Organization, 69: 913947.
JensenB., Quinn D., and Weymouth S. (2013), ‘Global Supply Chains, Currency Undervaluation, and Firm Protectionist Demands’, Working Paper 19239, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, (accessed 17 September 2015).
JordanM. (2005), ‘The Politics of Drug Patenting in Canada’, Masters dissertation, University of Saskatchewan.
KeohaneR. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
KeonJ. (2001), ‘Statement on the amendment of the Patent Act’, Speech, House of Commons Standing Committee on Industry, Science, and Technology, 17 May, Ottowa.
KimI. S. (forthcoming) ‘Political Cleavages within Industry: Firm level lobbying for Trade Liberalization’, American Political Science Review, http://www.princeton.edu/~insong/research/exporters.pdf.
KimI. S., Milner H., Bernauer T., Osgood I., Spilker G., and Tingley D. (2016), ‘Firms' Preferences over Multidimensional Trade Policies: Global Production Chains, Investment Protection and Dispute Settlement Mechanisms’, Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), http://web.mit.edu/insong/www/pdf/conjoint.pdf.
KimS. Y. (2015), ‘Regionalization in Search of Regionalism: Production Networks and Deep Integration Commitments in Asia's PTAs’, in Dür A. and Elsig M. (eds.), The Purpose, Design, and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KrikorianJ. (2005), ‘Planes, Trains and Automobiles: The Impact of the WTO “Court” on Canada in Its First Ten Years’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8(4), 921975.
LanzR. and Miroudot S. (2011), ‘Intra-Firm Trade: Patterns, Determinants and Policy Implications’, Working Paper 114, Trade Policy Papers, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/trade/intra-firm-trade_5kg9p39lrwnn-en (accessed 12 April 2016).
LeulietteT. (2003), ‘Impact of the Section 201 Safeguard Action on Certain Steel Products’, Speech given before the US House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade, 26 March.
LexchinJ. (2005), ‘Intellectual Property Rights and the Canadian Pharmaceutical Marketplace: Where Do We Go From Here?’, International Journal of Health Service, 35(2): 237256.
LexchinJ. (2001), ‘Globalization, Trade Deals, and Drugs: Heads the industry wins tails Canada loses’, Canada Centre for Policy Alternatives Briefing Paper, 2(8). November 2001.
Lobby Canada (2001), ‘Registration and Organization Information: Rx&D’, Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada, (accessed 21 April 2017).
MangerM. (2012), ‘Vertical Trade Specialization and the Formation of North–South PTAs’, World Politics, 64(4): 622658.
MansfieldE., Milner H., and Rosendorff P. (2002), ‘Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements’, International Organization, 56(3), 477513.
MavroidisP. (2012), ‘On Compliance in the WTO: Enforcement among Unequal Disputants’, Briefing Paper No. 4, CUTS International, Geneva.
MavroidisP. (2000), ‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place’, European Journal of International Law, 11(4): 763813.
MelitzM. (2003), ‘The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity’, Econometrica, 71(6): 16951725.
MilnerH. and Moravcsik A. (2009), Power, Interdependence, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
OreficeG. and Rocha N. (2014), ‘Deep Integration and Production Networks: An Empirical Analysis’, The World Economy, 37(1): 106136.
OsgoodI. (2016), ‘The Breakdown of Industrial Opposition to Trade: Firms, Product Variety and Reciprocal Liberalization’, World Politics, DOI: .
OsgoodI., Tingley D., Bernauer T., Milner H. V., and Spilker G. (2016), ‘The Charmed Life of Superstar Exporters: Firms and Trade Policy in Costa Rica’, Journal of Politics, 79(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/687207.
ParkA. (1999), ‘Examination of Canada's Trade Objectives and the Forthcoming Agenda of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 25 March, New Brunswick.
PauwelynJ. (2000), ‘Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach’, American Journal of International Law, 94(2): 335347.
PetersonT. and Thies C. (2011), ‘Intra-industry Trade, Veto Players, and the Formation of Preferential Trade Agreements’, Unpublished manuscript, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266607811_Intra-industry_Trade_Veto_Players_and_the_Formation_of_Preferential_Trade_Agreements (accessed 27 April 2017).
PolettiA. and De Bièvre D. (2014), ‘Political Mobilization, Veto Players, and WTO Litigation: Explaining European Union Responses in Trade Disputes’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8):11811198.
Producteurs de lait du Québec (PLQ) (2013), ‘2013 Annual Report: 30 Years, Proud of Our Collective Achievements’, On file with author.
Producteurs de lait du Québec (PLQ) (2000), ‘Annual Report: Training and Information’, On file with author.
ReadR. (2005), ‘The EU–US WTO Steel Dispute: Political Economy of Protection and the Efficacy of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding’, in Perdikis N. and Read R., The WTO and the Regulation of International Trade: Recent Trade Disputes Between the European Union and the United States, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 135175.
ReifL. (2007), ‘Desperate Softwood Lumber Companies? The Canada–US Softwood Lumber Dispute and NAFTA Chapter 11’, Alberta Law Review, 45(2): 357380.
Saint-JacquesJ. (2000), ‘Information Session on the Canadian Dairy Exports under the World Trade Organization (WTO)’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 24 February, Ottowa.
SattlerT., Spilker G., and Bernauer T. (2015), ‘Does WTO Dispute Settlement Enforce or Inform?’, British Journal of Political Science, 44(4): 877902.
ShafferG. (2003), Defending Interests: Public–Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
SpilkerG. (2012), ‘Compliance with WTO Dispute Rulings’, Working Paper 2011–25, National Centre of Competence in Research Trade Regulation, Zurich, Switzerland.
StephensonS. (2013), ‘Global Value Chains: The New Reality of International Trade’, Overview paper prepared for the E15 Expert Group on Global Value Chains: Development Challenges and Policy Options, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
TomzM. (2007), ‘Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach’, International Organization, 61(4): 821840.
United States Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports (USLC) (2003), ‘Canadian Lumber Proposal Warrants Further Discussion’, Statement released on 31 July.
United States Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports (USLC) (2002), ‘WTO: Canadian Subsidies Exist, Subsidy to be Recalculated’, Statement released on 27 September.
United States Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports (USLC) (2002a), ‘US Lumber Industry Seeks Negotiated Offset to Unfair Trade’, Statement released on 17 December 2002.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2001), ‘Canada's Subsidized Dairy Exports: The Issue of WTO Compliance’, Special article prepared by Economic Research Service, August 2001, On file with author.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2000), ‘Canadian Dairy Industry Spokesman Speculates New Dairy Regime Won't Be WTO Compliant’, Global Agricultural Information Network Report CA0124, August 2000, On file with author.
United States International Trade Commission (USITC) (2003), ‘Steel-Consuming Industries: Competitive Conditions with Respect to Steel Safeguard Measures’, Investigation No. 332452.
United States International Trade Commission (USITC) (2001), ‘Determinations Concerning Impact of Imports of Steel on US Industry’, 23 October, https://www.usitc.gov/press_room/news_release/2001/er1023y1.pdf.
VerheulS. (2003), ‘Statement on the World Trade Organization's decision on the Canadian dairy export policy’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 18 March, Ottawa.
VinetS. (2000), ‘Information Session on the Canadian Dairy Exports under the World Trade Organization (WTO)’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 24 February, Ottawa.
WilsonB. (2007), ‘Compliance by WTO Members with Adverse WTO Dispute Settlement Rulings: The Record to Date’, Journal of International Economic Law, 10(2): 397403.
YildirimA. (2016), ‘Domestic Political Implications of Global Value Chains: Explaining EU Responses to Litigation at the World Trade Organization’, Comparative European Politics, DOI:10.1057/s41295-016-0085-3.
YoungA. (2010), ‘Effective Multilateralism on Trial: EU Compliance with WTO Law', in Blavoukos S. and Bourantonis D. (eds.), The EU's Presence in International Organisations, European Union Series: Routledge Advances in European Politics (67), Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 114131.
ZanglB. (2008), ‘Judicialization Matters! A Comparison of Dispute Settlement Under GATT and the WTO’, International Studies Quarterly, 52(4): 825854.
ZhangD. (2007), The Softwood Lumber War: Politics, Economics, and the Long US–Canadian Trade Dispute, Abingdon: Routledge.
ZhangD. and Laband D. (2003), ‘From Senators to the President: Solve the Lumber Problem or Else’, Public Choice, 123(3): 393410
ZoellickR. (2003), ‘Press Briefing by US Trade Representative Zoellick on Ending the Temporary Steel Safeguards’, The White House Office of the Press Secretary, Washington, DC, http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2003/12/20031204164450yessedo0.718197.html#ixzz45cv7YfiB (accessed 12 April 2016).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 33 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 261 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 29th June 2017 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.