Skip to main content
×
×
Home

‘Optimal’ Retaliation in the WTO – a commentary on the Upland Cotton Arbitration

  • GENE M. GROSSMAN (a1) and ALAN O. SYKES (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

The Upland Cotton case raises a range of interesting issues regarding the rationale for retaliation in the WTO system and the proper approach to its calibration. These include: Should the approach to retaliation differ in cases involving prohibited or actionable subsidies? When should cross-retaliation be allowed? Should retaliation be based only on the harm to the complaining nation, or to other nations as well? And, most importantly, what economic content can be given to the standard of countermeasures ‘equivalent to the level of nullification or impairment’? We address these and other issues from both a legal and economic perspective, with particular attention to the question of what level of retaliation will restore the lost welfare of the complaining nation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: grossman@princeton.edu
**Email: asykes@stanford.edu
References
Hide All
Bagwell Kyle (2008), ‘Remedies in the WTO: An Economic Perspective’, in Janow Merit E., Donaldson Victoria J. and Yanovich Alan (eds.), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries, Huntington, NY: Juris Publishing, pp. 733770.
Bagwell Kyle and Staiger Robert W. (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bagwell Kyle and Staiger Robert W. (2006), ‘Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?’, The American Economic Review, 96(3): 877895.
Baldwin Richard E. (1987), ‘Politically Realistic Objective Functions and Trade Policy: PROFS and Tariffs’, Economics Letters, 24(3): 287290.
Beshkar Mostafa (2010), ‘Optimal Remedies in International Trade Agreements’, European Economic Review, 54(3): 455466.
Bown Chad P. and Ruta Michele (2010), ‘The Economics of Permissible WTO Retaliation’, in Bown Chad P. and Pauwelyn Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149193.
Howse Robert and Neven Damien J. (2005), ‘United States – Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations”, Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under Article 22.6 of the DSU and Article 4.11 of the SCM Agreement (WT/DS108/ARB), A Comment’, in Horn Henrik and Mavroidis Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters' Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3663.
Howse Robert and Staiger Robert W. (2006), ‘United States – Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 (Original Complaint by the European Communities) – Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under 22.6 of the DSU, WT/DS136/ARB, 24 February 2004: A Legal and Economic Analysis’, in Horn Henrik and Mavroidis Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2003: The American Law Institute Reporters' Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254279.
Jackson John H. (1997), ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Misunderstanding on the Nature of Legal Obligation’, American Journal of International Law, 91(1): 6064.
Lawrence Robert Z. (2003), Crimes and Punishments? Retaliation Under the WTO, Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Schnepf Randy (2010), Brazil's WTO Case Against the US Cotton Program, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Schropp Simon A. B. (2009), Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO: A Law and Economics Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz Warren F. and Sykes Alan O. (2002), ‘The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization’, The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1): S179S204.
Sykes Alan O. (2000), ‘The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?’, in Bronckers Marco and Quick Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson, The Hague: Kluwer, pp. 347357.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 373 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.