Skip to main content
×
×
Home

‘Optimal’ Retaliation in the WTO – a commentary on the Upland Cotton Arbitration

  • GENE M. GROSSMAN (a1) and ALAN O. SYKES (a2)
Abstract

The Upland Cotton case raises a range of interesting issues regarding the rationale for retaliation in the WTO system and the proper approach to its calibration. These include: Should the approach to retaliation differ in cases involving prohibited or actionable subsidies? When should cross-retaliation be allowed? Should retaliation be based only on the harm to the complaining nation, or to other nations as well? And, most importantly, what economic content can be given to the standard of countermeasures ‘equivalent to the level of nullification or impairment’? We address these and other issues from both a legal and economic perspective, with particular attention to the question of what level of retaliation will restore the lost welfare of the complaining nation.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      ‘Optimal’ Retaliation in the WTO – a commentary on the Upland Cotton Arbitration
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      ‘Optimal’ Retaliation in the WTO – a commentary on the Upland Cotton Arbitration
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      ‘Optimal’ Retaliation in the WTO – a commentary on the Upland Cotton Arbitration
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: grossman@princeton.edu
**Email: asykes@stanford.edu
References
Hide All
Bagwell, Kyle (2008), ‘Remedies in the WTO: An Economic Perspective’, in Janow, Merit E., Donaldson, Victoria J. and Yanovich, Alan (eds.), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries, Huntington, NY: Juris Publishing, pp. 733770.
Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W. (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W. (2006), ‘Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?’, The American Economic Review, 96(3): 877895.
Baldwin, Richard E. (1987), ‘Politically Realistic Objective Functions and Trade Policy: PROFS and Tariffs’, Economics Letters, 24(3): 287290.
Beshkar, Mostafa (2010), ‘Optimal Remedies in International Trade Agreements’, European Economic Review, 54(3): 455466.
Bown, Chad P. and Ruta, Michele (2010), ‘The Economics of Permissible WTO Retaliation’, in Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149193.
Howse, Robert and Neven, Damien J. (2005), ‘United States – Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations”, Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under Article 22.6 of the DSU and Article 4.11 of the SCM Agreement (WT/DS108/ARB), A Comment’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters' Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3663.
Howse, Robert and Staiger, Robert W. (2006), ‘United States – Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 (Original Complaint by the European Communities) – Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under 22.6 of the DSU, WT/DS136/ARB, 24 February 2004: A Legal and Economic Analysis’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2003: The American Law Institute Reporters' Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254279.
Jackson, John H. (1997), ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Misunderstanding on the Nature of Legal Obligation’, American Journal of International Law, 91(1): 6064.
Lawrence, Robert Z. (2003), Crimes and Punishments? Retaliation Under the WTO, Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Schnepf, Randy (2010), Brazil's WTO Case Against the US Cotton Program, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Schropp, Simon A. B. (2009), Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO: A Law and Economics Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, Warren F. and Sykes, Alan O. (2002), ‘The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization’, The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1): S179S204.
Sykes, Alan O. (2000), ‘The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?’, in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson, The Hague: Kluwer, pp. 347357.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 57 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 455 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.