Skip to main content

The Politics of ‘Dolphin-Safe’ Tuna in the United States: Policy Change and Reversal, Lock-in and Adjustment to International Constraints (1984–2017)


Recently, the World Trade Organization (WTO) granted Mexico the right to retaliate against the US as a compensation for losses related to the US ‘dolphin-safe’ label (May 2017). Despite the diversity of works on the issue, few analyze the changes in the US approach to dolphin protection as a result of international and domestic pressures related to the tuna–dolphin controversy. This paper seeks to understand such changes and their consequences using the process tracing method. It shows that (1) the US approach to dolphin protection passed through a process of policy change motivated by trade and diplomatic concerns mediating dolphin protection, and that (2) it was partially reversed in court as an outcome of the concessions offered to get the policy change approved. Finally, the paper argues that (3) this process led to the lock-in of the US ‘dolphin-safe’ label and to its expansion in response to recent WTO decisions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Politics of ‘Dolphin-Safe’ Tuna in the United States: Policy Change and Reversal, Lock-in and Adjustment to International Constraints (1984–2017)
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Politics of ‘Dolphin-Safe’ Tuna in the United States: Policy Change and Reversal, Lock-in and Adjustment to International Constraints (1984–2017)
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Politics of ‘Dolphin-Safe’ Tuna in the United States: Policy Change and Reversal, Lock-in and Adjustment to International Constraints (1984–2017)
      Available formats
Corresponding author
Hide All

Earlier versions of this study benefited from comments and suggestions by James Hollway and Camilla Geraldello. I also thank the two anonymous reviewers and the WTR's Editor for their insightful comments along the peer-reviewing process.

Hide All
Amandé, M., Ariz, J., Chassot, E., Molina, A., Gaertner, D., Murta, H., Pianet, R., Ruiz, J., and Chavance, P. (2010), ‘Bycatch of the European Purse Seine Tuna Fishery in the Atlantic Ocean for the 2003–2007 Period’, Aquatic Living Creatures, 23: 353362.
Baird, I. and Quastel, N. (2011), ‘Dolphin-Safe Tuna from California to Thailand: Localisms in Environmental Certification of Global Commodity Networks’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(2): 337355.
Bennett, A. and George, A. (1997), ‘Process Tracing in Case Study Research’, Paper prepared to the MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods, 17–19 October.
Bonanno, A. and Constance, D. (2010), Stories of Globalization: Transnational Corporations, Resistance and the State, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Bradsher, K. (1991), ‘Official Tells of Progress on Trade’, New York Times, 25 November: D.2.
Burney, D. (1988), ‘Statement on Behalf of the US Tuna Foundation: In US Senate, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Reauthorization of the Marine Mammal Protection Act’, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 130–137.
Conceição-Heldt, E. (2013), ‘Two-Level Games and Trade Cooperation: What Do We Now Know?’, International Politics, 50(4): 579599.
Crowley, M. and Howse, R. (2014), ‘Tuna–Dolphin II: A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Appellate Body Report’, World Trade Review, 13(2): 321355.
Cullet, P. and Kameri-Mbote, A. P. (1996), ‘Dolphin Bycatches in Tuna Fisheries: A Smokescreen Hiding the Real Issues?’, Ocean Development and International Law, 27: 333348
Curtin, P. and Eastman, S. (1989), ‘Beach City Urges Residents to Stop Eating Tuna’, St. Petersburg Times, 7 July.
Dagorn, L., Holland, K., Restrepo, V., and Moreno, G. (2013), ‘Is It Good or Bad to Fish with FADs? What Are the Real Impacts of the Use of Drifting FADs on Pelagic Marine Ecosystems?’, Fish and Fisheries, 14(3): 391415.
De Sombre, E. (2000), Domestic Sources of International Environmental Policy: Industry, Environmentalists and US Power, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
De Vos, B. and Bush, S. (2011), ‘Far More than Market-Based: Rethinking the Impact of the Dutch Viswijzer (Good Fish Guide) on Fisheries’ Governance’, Sociologia Ruralis, 51(3): 284303.
Destler, I. M. (2005), American Trade Politics, 4th edn, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Destler, I. M. and Balint, P.. (1999), The New Politics of American Trade, Washington, DC: Peterson Institute of International Economics.
Tuna, Eco-safe (2016), NOAA Says ‘No’ to Dolphin-Safe, (accessed 30 March 2016).
Edwards, E. (2007), ‘Fishery Effects on Dolphins Targeted by Tuna Purse-seiners in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean’, International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 20(2): 217227.
Epstein, D. and O'Halloran, S. (1996), ‘Divided Government and the Design of Administrative Procedures: A Formal Model and Empirical Test’, Journal of Politics, 58(2): 373397.
Register, Federal (2016), Enhanced Document Requirements and Captain Training Requirements to Support Use of the Dolphin Safe Label on Tuna Products, (accessed 9 May 2016).
Ferguson, T. (1993), ‘Business World: One Entangling Edible in the GATT Fight’, Wall Street Journal, 26 November.
Fiore, F. (1995), ‘Activists Alarmed by Bid to Reverse Dolphin-Safety Law: Ocean: GOP Bill Would Lift Ban on Tuna Caught when the Mammals Are Killed. Free-Trade Treaties Muddy Waters’, Los Angeles Times, 9 September,
Fioretos, O. (2011), ‘Historical Institutionalism in International Relations’, International Organization, 65(2): 367399.
Gerrodette, T., Watters, G., Perryman, W., and Ballance, L. (2008), ‘Estimates of 2006 Dolphin Abundance in the Eastern Tropical Pacific, with Revised Estimates from 1986–2003’, NOAA Technicical Memorandum NMFS, April.
Gerrodette, T., Olson, R., Reilly, S., Waters, G., and Perrin, W. (2012), ‘Ecological Metrics of Biomass Removed by Three Methods of Purse-Seine Fishing for Tunas in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean’, Conservation Biology, 26(2): 248256.
Goldstein, J. (1986), ‘The Political Economy of Trade: Institutions of Protection’, American Political Science Review, 80(1): 161–84.
Giovannucci, D. and Ponte, S. (2005), ‘Standards as New Forms of Social Contract? Sustainability Initiatives in the Coffee Industry’, Food Policy, 30: 284301.
Hale, J. (1995), ‘The Making of the New Democrats’, Political Science Quarterly, 110(5): 207232.
Hall, M. (1998), ‘An Ecological View of the Tuna–Dolphin Problem: Impacts and Trade-Offs’, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 8: 134.
Hallier, J. and Gaertner, D. (2008), ‘Drifting Fish Aggregation Devices Could Act as an Ecological Trap for Tropical Tuna Species’, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 353(3): 255264.
Humphries, M. A. and Songer, D.. (1999), ‘Law and Politics in Judicial Oversight of Federal Administrative Agencies’, Journal of Politics, 61(1): 208210.
Hutchings, V. (2001), ‘Political Context, Issue Salience, and Selective Attentiveness: Constituent Knowledge of the Clarence Thomas Confirmation Vote’, Journal of Politics, 63(3): 846868.
IATTC – Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (1997), Minutes of the 59th Meeting, (accessed 23 April 2016).
Iida, K. (1993), ‘When and How Do Domestic Constraints Matter? Two-Level Games with Uncertainty’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37(3): 403426.
Inside US Trade (1993), ‘Environmental Groups Press for Dolphin Mortality Ban as Condition for NAFTA’, 30 April.
Inside US Trade (1994), ‘US Considers Changing Tuna–Dolphin Law at Mexican Urging’, 1 July.
Inside US Trade (1995a), ‘California Republicans Introduce Bill to Lift Tuna Embargo’, 22 June.
Inside US Trade (1995b), ‘Latin Nations Propose More Dolphin Protection to End Tuna Fight’, 4 October.
Inside US Trade (1995c), ‘Senators Ready Dolphin Bill after Talks with Tuna, Green Groups’, 17 November.
Inside US Trade (1996a), ‘Hollings Makes Last Ditch Effort to Broker Tuna–Dolphin Compromise’, 12 July.
Inside US Trade (1996b), ‘Boxer, Biden Submit Tuna–Dolphin Bill to Compete with Breaux–Stevens’, 8 December 1995.
Inside US Trade (1996c), ‘Clinton Pledges Early, Renewed Effort to Pass Tuna–Dolphin Bill’, 18 October.
Inside US Trade (1997), ‘Tuna–Dolphin Law Delays Label Change until Commerce Study is Done’, 8 August.
Inside US Trade (2011), ‘Mexico Prevails in Tuna Fight but Extent of Victory is Limited’, 20 May.
Inside US Trade (2012a), ‘Mexico Confident US Will Comply with Tuna Ruling to Provide Market Access’, 25 May.
Inside US Trade (2012b), ‘US, Mexico Launch Separate WTO Appeals in US Tuna Labeling Case’, 27 January.
Inside US Trade (2013), ‘Mexico Says Draft US Tuna Labeling Rule Does Not Remove Discrimination’, 3 May.
Inside US Trade (2015a), ‘WTO Finds US Tuna Labeling Rules Still Discriminate Against Mexico’, 17 April.
Inside US Trade (2015b), ‘USTR Says Voluntary Cool Label Ok, but Retaliation Looms Over Debate’, 6 August.
Inside US Trade (2016a), ‘US Claims Compliance in WTO Tuna Dispute with Second Modified Rule’, 25 March.
Inside US Trade (2016b), ‘US, Mexico Brawl Over Arbitration, Compliance Procedures in Tuna Fight’, 29 April.
Jaquemet, S., Potier, M., and Ménard, F. (2011), ‘Do Drifting and Anchored Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) Similarly Influence Tuna Feeding Habits? A Case Study from the Western Indian Ocean’, Fish Resources, 107: 283290
Johnson, E. and Prakash, A. (2007), ‘NGO Research Program: A Collective Action Perspective’, Policy Science, 403: 221240.
Joseph, J. (1994), ‘The Tuna–Dolphin Controversy in the Eastern Pacific Ocean: Biological, Economic, and Political Impacts’, Ocean Development and International Law, 25:130.
Karol, D. (2000), ‘Divided Government and US Trade Policy: Much Ado about Nothing?’, International Organization, 54(4): 825844.
Korber, A. (1998), ‘Why Everybody Loves Flipper: The Political-Economy of the US Dolphin-Safe Laws’, European Journal of Political Economy, 14: 475509.
Leroy, B., Phillips, J., Nicol, S., Pilling, G., Harley, S., Bromhead, D., Hoyle, S., Caillot, S., Allain, V., and Hampton, J. (2013), ‘A Critique of the Ecosystem Impacts of Drifting and Anchored Fads Use by Purse-Seine Tuna Fisheries in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean’, Aquatic Living Creatures, 26(4): 4961.
Marine Mammal Commission (1996), Annual Report to the Congress, (accessed 23 March 2016).
Marine Mammal Commission (2006), Annual Report to the Congress, (accessed 23 March 2016).
Marquis, C. (2003a), ‘2 Scientists Contend US Suppressed Dolphin Studies’, New York Times, 9 January 2003, A.24.
Marquis, C. (2003b), ‘Rule Weakening Definition of “Dolphin Safe” is Delayed’, New York Times, 10 January.
Marquis, C. (2003c), ‘US Rules that Foreign Fleets' Use of Tuna Nets Is Safe for Dolphins’, New York Times, 1 January.
May, P. (1992), ‘Policy Learning and Failure’, Journal of Public Policy, 12(4): 331354.
McCubbins, M., Noll, R., and Weingast, B. (1987), ‘Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3(2): 243277.
Meinert, D. (1989), ‘Tuna Officials, US Oppose Can-Labeling Info’, The Tribune, 5 October, A.18.
Mo, J. (1994), ‘The Logic of Two-Level Games with Endogenous Domestic Coalitions’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(3): 402422.
Musgrave, K. and Stephens, G. (1993), ‘The GATT–Tuna Dolphin Dispute: An Update’, Natural Resources Journal, 33: 957975.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2017), Text of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, (accessed 19 August 2017).
New York Times (1989), ‘US Defends Law on Monitoring Dolphin Killings’, 23 August, A.14.
Olson, M. (1977), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Palmer, M. (2003), ‘Secret dolphin report released’, Earth Island Journal, 18(1): 1718.
Putnam, R. (1988), ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization, 42(3): 427460.
Rainforest-Alliance (2012), Towards Sustainability: The Roles and Limitations of Certification, June.
Rasmussen, A., Carroll, B., and Lowery, D. (2014), ‘Representatives of the Public? Public Opinion and Interest Groups Activity’, European Journal of Political Research, 53(2): 250268.
Sabatier, P. and Weible, C. (2007), ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework – Innovations and Clarifications’, in Sabatier, Paul A. (ed.), Theories of Policy Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 189223
Shabecoff, P. (1988), ‘Senate Panel Urged to Toughen Curbs on Killing of Dolphins’, New York Times, 14 April.
Shabecoff, P. (1990), ‘3 Companies to Stop Selling Tuna Netted with Dolphins’, New York Times, 13 April, A.1.
Sheehan, R. (1990), ‘Administrative Agencies and the Court: A Reexamination of the Impact of Agency Type on Decisional Outcomes’, Western Political Quarterly, 43: 875885.
Stelle, W. Jr. (2013), ‘Enhanced Document Requirements and Captain Training Requirements to Support Use of the Dolphin Safe Label on Tuna Products, Interim Final Rule’, NOAA-NMFS-2016-0012, 81 Fed. Reg. 15444, Public Comment from the National Fisheries Institute to the US Federal Register.
Sustein, C., Schkade, D., Ellman, L., and Sawicki, A. (2006), Are Judges Political? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Teisl, M., Roe, B., and Ricks, R. (2002), ‘Can Eco-Labels Tune a Market? Evidence from Dolphin-Safe Labeling’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43(3): 339359.
Tsebelis, G. (2002), Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
United Nations General Assembly – UNGA (1989), ‘Large-Scale Pelagic Driftnet Fishing and Its Impact on the Living Marine Resources of the World's Oceans and Seas’, A/RES/44/225.
US Department of State (1992), ‘US Policy on Tuna–Dolphin Issues’, US Department of State Dispatch 3(34): 667, 24 August.
Vandergeest, P., Unno, A. (2012), ‘A New Territoriality? Aquaculture Certification, Sovereignty, and Empire’, Political Geography, 31: 358367.
Vandergeest, P., Ponte, S., and Bush, S. (2015), ‘Assembling Sustainable Territories: Space, Subjects, Objects, and Expertise in Seafood Certification’, Environment and Planning, 47: 119.
Volcansek, M. (2001), ‘Constitutional Courts as Veto Players: Divorce and Decrees in Italy’, European Journal of Political Research, 39(3): 347372
Wade, P., Watters, G., Gerrodette, T., and Reilly, S. (2007), ‘Depletion of Spotted and Spinner Dolphins in the Eastern Tropical Pacific: Modeling Hypotheses for Their Lack of Recovery’, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 343: 114.
Weisskopf, M. (1988), ‘Tuna-Fishing Casualties: Dolphins, Thousands Killed, Senators Told’, The Washington Post, 14 April.
Woolf, N. (1997), Greenpeace, Other Groups Praise New US Congressional Effort, (accessed 1 April).
Wright, B. (2000), ‘Environmental NGOs and the Dolphin–Tuna Case’, Environmental Politics 9(4): 83103.
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2016), Environmental Disputes, (accessed 4 May 2017).
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2017), ‘TBT Agreement’, (accessed 20 August).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed