Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Revisiting Procedure and Precedent in the WTO: An Analysis of US – Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Measures (China)

  • MOSTAFA BESHKAR (a1) and ADAM S. CHILTON (a2)
Abstract

After not applying countervailing duty (CVD) law against non-market economies (NMEs) for two decades, the United States opened a CVD investigation against China in 2006. After extensive litigation, a US appeals court ruled that it was illegal to apply CVD law to NMEs. While that ruling was being appealed, the US Congress passed legislation stipulating that the application of CVD law to NMEs starting in 2006 was legal. China challenged this legislation at the WTO. The dispute resulted in a ruling that left open the possibility that the legislation violated the GATT, as well as a finding that the United States must investigate its application of countervailing and antidumping duties against China. This dispute has implications for a number of current WTO debates including: whether Appellate Body rulings create a binding precedent, whether the Appellate Body should have authority to remand cases, and what information should be required in panel requests.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Revisiting Procedure and Precedent in the WTO: An Analysis of US – Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Measures (China)
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Revisiting Procedure and Precedent in the WTO: An Analysis of US – Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Measures (China)
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Revisiting Procedure and Precedent in the WTO: An Analysis of US – Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Measures (China)
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: mbeshkar@indiana.edu
**Email: adamchilton@uchicago.edu
References
Hide All
Bhala, R. (1999), ‘The Myth About Stare Decisis and International Trade Law’, American University International Law Review, 14: 845956.
Bhala, R. and Attard, L. (2003), ‘Austin's Ghost and DSU Reform’, The International Lawyer, 37(3): 651676.
Beshkar, M. and Majbouri, M. (2015), ‘Estimating a Model of Settlement Bargaining in the WTO’, Working Paper.
Bronckers, M. and Maskus, K. E. (2014), ‘China–Raw Materials: A Controversial Step Towards Evenhanded Exploitation of Natural Resources’, World Trade Review, 13(2): 393408.
Busch, M. L. and Reinhardt, E. (2006), ‘Three's a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement’, World Politics, 58(3): 446477.
Crowley, M. and Palmeter, D. (2009), ‘Japan – Countervailing Duties on Dynamic Random Access Memories from Korea (DS 336 and Corr.1, adopted 17 December 2007)’, World Trade Review, 8(1): 259272.
Francois, J. F. and Palmeter, D. (2008), ‘US – Countervailing Duty Investigation of DRAMS’, World Trade Review, 7(1): 219229.
Gélinas, F. (2006), ‘Dispute Resolution as Institutionalization in International Trade and Information Technology’, Fordham Law Review, 74: 489504.
Iynedjian, M. (2005), ‘Reform of the WTO Appeal Process’, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 6: 809840.
Janow, M. E. and Staiger, R. W. (2004), ‘Canada – Dairy Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk’, World Trade Review, 3(2): 277315.
Kingery, J. (2000), ‘Commentary: Operation of Dispute Settlement Panels’, Law and Policy in International Business, 31: 665673.
Lockhart, J. and Voon, T. (2005), ‘Reviewing Appellate Review in the WTO Dispute Settlement System’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 6: 474484.
Maggi, G. and Staiger, R. W. (2011), ‘The Role of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Trade Agreements’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1): 475515.
Palmeter, D. (1998), ‘The WTO Appellate Body Needs Remand Authority’, Journal of World Trade, 23: 4144.
Palmeter, D. and Mavroidis, P. C. (1998), ‘The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law’, American Journal of International Law, 92: 398413.
Pauwleyn, J. (2007), ‘Appeal Without Remand: A Design Flaw in the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement and How to Fix it’, ICTSD Dispute Settlement and Legal Aspects of International Trade Issue Paper, No. 1.
Prusa, T. J. and Vermulst, E. (2013), ‘United States – Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China: Passing the Buck on Pass-Through’, World Trade Review, 12(2): 197234.
Van den Bossche, P. and Zdouc, W. (2013), The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed