Brewer, Scott (1998), ‘Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process’, Yale Law Journal, 107: 1535–1681.
Cass, Ronald A. and Michael, S. Knoll (1997), ‘The Economics of “Injury” in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Cases: A Reply to Professor Sykes’, in Jagdeep, S. Bhandari and Alan, O. Sykes (eds) Economic Dimensions in International Law: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126–165.
Heckman, James J. (2000), ‘Causal Parameters and Policy Analysis in Economics: A Twentieth Century Retrospective’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1): 45–97.
Hudec, Robert E. (1998), ‘Does the Agreement on Agriculture Work? Agricultural Disputes After the Uruguay Round’, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, Working Paper No. 98-2.
Pauwelyn, Joost (2002), ‘The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 51: 325–364.
Schnepf, Randy (2005), ‘Background on the US-Brazil WTO Cotton Subsidy Dispute’, Congressional Research Service Report, 11 July 2005.
Steinberg, Richard H. and Timothy, E. Josling (2003), ‘When the Peace Ends: The Vulnerability of EC and US Agricultural Subsidies to WTO Legal Challenge’, Journal of International Economic Law, 6(2): 369–417.
Sumner, Daniel A. (2003), ‘The Impacts of US Cotton Subsidies on Cotton Prices and Quantities: Simulation Analysis for the WTO Dispute’, Mimeo, Condensed and edited version of Annex I presented to the WTO cotton-dispute panel in September 2003.
Sykes, Alan O. (2003), ‘The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures’, University of Chicago John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper No. 186.
Sykes, Alan O. (1996), ‘The Economics of Injury in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Cases’, International Review of Law and Economics, 16(1): 5–26.
WTO Secretariat (2005), ‘Quantitative Economics in WTO Dispute Settlement’, World Trade Report 2005, Geneva: WTO.