Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The TBT Panels: US–Cloves, US–Tuna, US–COOL

  • ROBERT HOWSE (a1) and PHILIP I. LEVY (a2)
Abstract

In a series of controversial 2011 decisions, WTO DSM Panels sought to reconcile legitimate regulatory interests of the state with various obligations to treat imported products in an even-handed and not unnecessarily trade-restrictive manner. Among the key points of contention were which obligation pertained in each case – national treatment, limits on technical regulations, or rules governing standards. In each case, the Panel imposed significant restrictions on national regulatory practices, and in each case the Panel reasoning was challenged by the Appellate Body. This paper addresses some of the key legal and economic issues raised in the original Panel decisions, leaving the late-breaking Appellate Body decisions for future analysis. Given the unsettled nature of the terrain, the economic analysis focuses primarily on the question of national treatment, while the legal analysis deals with other interesting points that emerge from these rulings, such as the appropriate level of deference to international standards and the legitimacy of labeling requirements.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The TBT Panels: US–Cloves, US–Tuna, US–COOL
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The TBT Panels: US–Cloves, US–Tuna, US–COOL
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The TBT Panels: US–Cloves, US–Tuna, US–COOL
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Grossman, G. M., Horn, H., and Mavroidis, P. C. (2012), ‘Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law: National Treatment’, in ALI, Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law: The Genesis of the GATT, the Economics of Trade Agreements, Border Instruments, and National Treatment, Report to ALI.
Hadfield, G. K., Howse, R., and Trebilcock, M. J. (1998), ‘Information-Based Principles for Rethinking Consumer Protection Policy’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 21(2): 131169.
Harbaugh, R., Maxwell, J. W., and Roussillon, B. (2011), ‘Label Confusion: The Groucho Effect of Uncertain Standards’, Management Science, 57(9): 15121527.
Héroux, L., Laroche, M., and McGown, K. L. (1988), ‘Consumer Product Label Information Processing: An Experiment Involving Time Pressure and Distraction’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(2): 195214.
Hobbs, J. E. (2003), ‘Traceability and Country of Origin Labelling’, Policy Dispute Information Consortium 9th Agricultural and Food Policy Information Workshop, Montreal, 25 April.
Horn, H. (2006), ‘National Treatment in the GATT’, American Economic Review, 96(1): 394404.
Howse, R. (2002), ‘From Politics to Technocracy and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime’, American Journal of International Law, 96(1): 94117.
Loureiro, M. L. and Umberger, W. J. (2007), ‘A Choice Experiment Model for Beef: What US Consumer Responses Tell Us about Relative Preferences for Food Safety, Country-of-Origin Labeling and Traceability’, Food Policy, 32(4): 496514.
Palmeter, D. and Mavroidis, P. C. (1998), ‘The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law’, American Journal of International Law, 92(3): 398413.
Roberts, T., Malcolm, S. A., and Narrod, C. A. (1999), ‘Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Slaughterhouse Practices: Modelling Contamination Process Control in Beef Destined for Hamburger’, Probabilistic Safety Assessment PSA '99: Risk-Informed Performance-Based Regulation in the New Millennium, Modarres, Mohammad (ed.), 809815.
Teisl, M. F., Roe, B., and Hicks, R. L. (2002), ‘Can Eco-Labels Tune a Market? Evidence from Dolphin-Safe Labeling’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43(3): 339359.
Umberger, W. J. (2004), ‘Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Country-of-Origin Labeled Meat?’, Choices, 4th quarter.
Wansink, B., Sonka, S. T., and Hasler, C. M. (2004), ‘Front-Label Health Claims: When Less is More’, Food Policy, 29(6): 659667.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×