Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T09:22:29.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States – Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998 (WT/DS176/AB/R) A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

Robert Howse  and
Damien J. Neven
Robert Howse
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Law School
Damien J. Neven
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva and CEPR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As usual the authors have divided their labor, based on expertise. In particular, the economic analysis in section 4 was the responsibility of Damien Neven; Robert Howse’s own understanding of the costs and benefits of international trade law rules with respect to intellectual property protection in general depends on a rather different framework for analysing the problem. However, in so far as the legal and economic analysis of the Havana Club case itself is concerned, which deals only with trademarks as a form of IP protection, the authors are in agreement.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 4 , Special Issue S1: The WTO Case Law Of 2002 , 2005 , pp. 179 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

References

Beebe, B. (2003), The semiotic analyis of trademark law, Mimeo, Benjamin Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University.Google Scholar
Coombe, R. (1998), The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Economides, N. (1984), The economics of trademarks, WP 21, Columbia.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. and Lai, E. (2002), International protection of intellectual property, NBER Working Paper N° 8704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R. (2000), Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence, in The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade? edited by Weiler, J. H. H., 35–69. The Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, 9/1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howse, R. and Nicolaidis, K. (2003), Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity? Governance 16, no. 1 (2003): 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R. and Tuerk, E. (2001), The WTO Impact on Internal Regulations – A Case Study of the Canada-EC Asbestos Dispute, in The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues, edited by de Burca, G. and Scott, J., 283–328. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Landes, W. and Posner, R. (1987), Trademark law: an economic perspective, The Journal of Law and Economics, 30 (2), 265–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, W. and Posner, R. (2003), The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maskus, K. (2000), Intellectual Property Rights in the Gobal Economy. Washington, DC: The Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. (1969), Invention, Growth and Welfare: a Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scotchmer, S. (2002), The political economy of intellectual property treaties, NBER Working Paper N° 9114.Google Scholar
Van Wezel Stone, Katherine (1999), To the Yukon and Beyond: Local Laborers in a Global Labor Market. Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law.Google Scholar