Skip to main content
×
Home

What is not so Cool about US–COOL Regulations? A critical analysis of the Appellate Body's ruling on US–COOL

  • PETROS C. MAVROIDIS (a1) and KAMAL SAGGI (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

In US–COOL, the Appellate Body (AB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) found that the US measure imposing country of origin labelling (COOL) requirements on livestock of domestic, foreign, and mixed origin was in violation of the obligation to avoid discrimination embedded in Article 2.1 of the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). We argue that the AB could not and should not have reached this decision based on the information available to it. The AB adopted an erroneous methodology: under its view, the consistency of a measure coming under the purview of the TBT can be examined under Article 2.1 irrespective of its evaluation under Article 2.2 thereby making the two obligations distinct. The AB also failed to address the central question raised by this dispute: Does there exist an alternative to COOL that is less trade restrictive? We argue that the over-arching issue in this case should have been to determine what, if anything, the TBT Agreement did to alter or enhance the obligation of non-discrimination that was already embedded in the arsenal of the multilateral trading rules. Unless the AB asks this question in subsequent case law pertaining to the TBT, we risk seeing repetitions of similar mistakes in the future.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: Petros.Mavroidis@unine.ch
References
Hide All
Baldwin R. E. (1970), Non-Tariff Distortions in International Trade, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Horn H., Johannesson L., and Mavroidis P. C. (2011), ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement System: 1995–2010, Some Descriptive Statistics’, Journal of World Trade, 45: 11071138.
Horn H. and Weiler J. H. H. (2007), ‘EC–Trade Description of Sardines: Textualism and Its Discontent’, in Horn H. and Mavroidis P. C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2001–2003, the American Law Institute Reporters' Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 551578.
Howse R. and Levy P. (2012), ‘The TBT Panels: US–Clove Cigarettes, US–Tuna, and US–COOL’, The World Trade Review, 12: 327376.
Irwin D. A. (1998), ‘Changes in US Tariffs: The Role of Import Prices and Commercial Policies’, The American Economic Review, 88: 10151026.
Irwin D. A., Mavroidis P. C., and Sykes A. O. (2008), The Genesis of the GATT, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jurenas R. and Greene J. L. (2013), Country of Origin Labelling for Foods and the WTO Dispute on Meat Labelling, Congressional Research Service.
Mavroidis P. C. (2013), ‘Driftin’ Too Far from Shore: Why the Test for Compliance with the TBT Agreement Developed by the WTO Appellate Body is Wrong, and what Should the Appellate Body Have Done Instead’, The World Trade Review, 12(3): 509531.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 78 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 456 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 14th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.