Skip to main content Accessibility help

Why Trade Agreements are not Setting Information Free: The Lost History and Reinvigorated Debate over Cross-Border Data Flows, Human Rights, and National Security



Herein, we examine how the United States and the European Union use trade agreements to advance the free flow of information and to promote digital rights online. In the 1980s and 1990s, after US policymakers tried to include language governing the free flow of information in trade agreements, other nations feared a threat to their sovereignty and their ability to restrict cross-border data flows in the interest of privacy or national security.

In the twenty-first century, again many states have not responded positively to US and EU efforts to facilitate the free flow of information. They worry that the US dominates both the Internet economy and Internet governance in ways that benefit its interests. After the Snowden allegations, many states adopted strategies that restricted rather than enhanced the free flow of information. Without deliberate intent, efforts to set information free through trade liberalization may be making the Internet less free.

Finally, the two trade giants are not fully in agreement on Internet freedom, but neither has linked policies to promote the free flow of information with policies to advance digital rights. Moreover, they do not agree as to when restrictions on information are necessary and when they are protectionist.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Aaronson, S. A. with Townes, M. (2012), ‘Can Trade Policy Set Information Free: Trade Agreements, Internet Governance and Internet Freedom (Policy Brief)’,
Aaronson, S.A. and Maxim, R. (2013), ‘Data Protection and Digital Trade in the Wake of the NSA Revelations’, Intereconomics, 48, September/October,
Aaronson, S. A. and Zimmerman, J. M. (2008), Trade Imbalance: The Struggle to Weigh Human Rights Concerns in Trade Policymaking, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ahearn, R. J. (2005), ‘Trade Liberalization Challenges Post-CAFTA’, CRS Report RS22339, 11/30. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Bagwell, K., Mavroidis, P., and Staiger, R. W. (2002), ‘It's a Question of Market Access’, The American Journal of International Law, 96(1): 5676.
Berry, R. and Reisman, M. (2012), ‘Policy Challenges of Cross-Border Cloud Computing’, Journal of International Commerce and Economics, 4(2), (accessed 3 July 2014).
Bieron, B. and Ahmed, U. (2012), ‘Regulating E-Commerce through International Policy: Understanding the International Trade Law Issues of E-Commerce’, Journal of World Trade, 46(3): 545570.
Bildt, C. (2012), ‘Carl Bildt's Speech at Stockholm Internet Forum 2012’, 18 April, Stockholm, Sweden, (accessed 5 August 2014).
Birnhack, M. D. and Elkin-Korean, N. (2003), ‘The Invisible Handshake: The Re-Emergence of the State in the Digital Environment’, Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 8(Summer).
Braman, S. (2012), ‘Internationalization of the Internet by Design: The First Decade’, Global Media and Communication, 8(1): 2745.
Brown, R. W. (1984), ‘Economic and Trade Related Aspects of Transborder Data Flow: Elements of a Code for Transnational Commerce’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 6(1): 186.
Burri, M. (2013), ‘Should There be New Multilateral Rules for digital Trade? Think Piece for the E15 Expert Group on Trade and Innovation’, September 2013,
Business Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) to the OECD (1999), ‘Action Plan for Electronic Commerce’.
Büthe, T. and Milner, H. V. (2008), ‘The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements?’, American Journal of Political Science, 52(4): 741762.
Chander, A. and Le, U. P. (2014), ‘Breaking the Web: Data Localization vs. the Global Internet’, Legal Studies Research Paper (2014–1), Emory Law Journal, UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 378, or
Chander, A. (2009), ‘Trade 2.0’, Yale Journal of International Law, 34: 281,
Checkel, J. T. (2008), ‘Process Tracing’, Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 114129.
Checkel, J. T. (2008), Comments of the Center for Democracy and Technology, 17, 22–23, (accessed 21 July 2013)
Checkel, J. T. (2008), Comments of the Computer and Communications Industry Association, see p. 9–10, 23, (accessed 5 August 2014).
‘Consultations towards a Canada–European Union Comprehensive Economic Agreement’ (2009), Canada DFAIT,
DeNardis, L. (2014), The Global War for Internet Governance, Yale University Press.
DeNardis, L. and Raymond, R. (2013), ‘Thinking Clearly about Multistakeholder Internet Governance’, paper presented at Eighth Annual GigaNet Symposium, Bali, Indonesia, SSRN, or
Denning, D. E. (2009), ‘Power over Information Flow’, in Subramanian, R. and Katz, E. (eds.), The Global Flow of Information: Legal, Social and Cultural Perspectives, New York: New York University Press,
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., and Garrett, G. (2007), ‘The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning?Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 449472.
Drake, W. J. (1993), ‘Territoriality and Intangibility: Transborder Data Flows and National Sovereignty’, in Nordenstreng, Kaarle and Schiller, Herbert I. (eds.), Beyond National Sovereignty: International Communications in the 1990s. Norwood: Ablex: pp. 259313.
Dreyer, I. and Hindley, B. (2008), Trade in Information Technology Goods: Adapting the ITA to 21stCentury Technological Change, ECIPE Working Paper 06/2008, European Centre for International Political Economy.
Drezner, D. W. (2004), ‘The Global Governance of the Internet: Bringing the State back in’, Political Science Quarterly, 119(3): 477498,
Dutton, W. and Law, G. et al. (2011), ‘The New Internet World: A Global Perspective on Freedom of Expression, Privacy, Trust and Security Online’, The Global Information Technology Report 2010–2011, New York, World Economic Forum.
eBay Inc. (2014), Commerce 3.0 for Development: The Promise of the Global Empowerment Network,
Eurobarometer (2013), ‘Cyber Security Report’, Report 390, p.5,
ECIPE- European Centre for International Political Economy (2013), ‘The Economic Importance of Getting Data Protection Right: Protecting Privacy, Transmitting Data, Moving Commerce’, (accessed 8 July 2014).
European Commission (1979), European Society Faced with the Challenge of New Information Technologies: A Community Response, COM (79) 650 final, 26 November 1979, (accessed 4 July 2014).
Farrell, H. (2003), ‘Constructing the International Foundations of E-Commerce – The EU–US Safe Harbor Arrangement’, International Organization, 57(2): 277306.
Farrell, H. and Newman, A. L. (2010), ‘Making Global Markets: Historical Institutionalism in International Political Economy’, Review of International Political Economy, 17(4): 609638.
Fascell, D. B. and Schlundt, V. M. (1983), ‘United States International Communications and Information Policy: A Crisis in the Making’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 5: 486.
Gasser, U. and Palfrey, J. (2012), ‘Fostering Innovation and Trade in the Global Information Society: The Different Facets and Roles of Interoperability’, in Burri, M. and Cottier, T., Trade Governance in the Digital Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldsmith, J. L. and Wu, T. (2006), Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 142181.
Hindley, B. and Makiyama, H. L. (2009), ‘Protectionism Online: Internet Censorship and International Trade Law’, ECIPE Working Paper No. 12/2009, (accessed 4 July 2014).
Kommerskollegium, National Board of Trade (2014), ‘No Transfer, No Trade: The Importance of Cross-Border Data Transfers for Companies Based in Sweden’,
Kommerskollegium, National Board of Trade (2012), ‘E-commerce-New Opportunities, New Barriers’,
Lee-Makiyama, H. (2011), ‘Future-Proofing World Trade in Technology: Turning the WTO IT Agreement into the International Digital Economy Agreement (IDEA)’, ECIPE Working Paper 4, European Centre for International Political Economy,
Lindmark, S. (2009), ‘Web 2.0: Where does Europe stand?’, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Commission,
Mandel, M. (2013), ‘Data, Trade and Growth’, TPRC 412, 41st Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, Progressive Policy Institute, March, or
Manyika, J., Bughin, J., Lund, S., Nottebohm, O., Poulter, D., Jauch, S., and Ramaswamy, S. (2014), ‘Global Flows in a Digital Age: How Trade, Finance People, and Data Connect the World Economy’, McKinsey Global Institute, April,
Marlin, B. R. (2012), “Governing the Flow: Power, Information, and Rules Online’, paper prepared for presentation at the 2012 International Studies Association Annual Meeting San Diego, California, March.
Maskus, K. E. and Reichman, J. H. (2004), ‘The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7(2): 279320.
Mattoo, A. and Schuknecht, L. (2000), ‘Trade Policies for Electronic Commerce’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper,
Mattoo, A. and Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2004), ‘Pre-empting Protectionism in Services: The GATS and Outsourcing’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7(4): 765800.
Maxwell, W. and Wolf, C. (2012), ‘A Global Reality: Government Access to Data in the Cloud –Comparative Analysis of Ten International Jurisdictions’, HoganLovells White Paper, (accessed 23 May 2013).
McLoughlin, G. (2000), ‘Electronic Commerce: An Introduction’, June, US Department of State, (accessed 14 July 2014).
Meeker, M. (2014), ‘Internet Trends 2014, Code Conference’, 28 May 2014,
Meier, B. and Worth, R. F. (2010), ‘Emirates to Cut Data Services of Blackberry’, The New York Times’, 2 August,
Mueller, M. L. (2010), Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
National Research Council (1987), Summary Report of the Workshop on The Revolution in Information and Communications Technology and the Conduct of US Foreign Affairs, Washington, DC: US National Academy of Sciences.
OECD (2013), ‘OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data’, at
OECD (2007), ‘Broadband and the Economy: Ministerial Background Report’, DSTI/ICCP/IE/2007/3/Final, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, March.
OECD (2011a), ‘OECD Council Recommendation on Principles for Internet Policy Making’, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, December.
OECD (2011b), ‘The Evolving Privacy Landscape: Thirty Years after the OECD Privacy Guidelines’,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, April.
Open Network Initiative (2008), ‘Regional Overviews’, (accessed 21 July 2014).
Pearce, R. (2014), ‘Data Retention: Privacy Commissioner Issues Warning on Security’, Techworld, 9 April 2014,
Ryan, P., Falvey, S., and Merchant, R. (2013), ‘When the Cloud Goes Local: The Global Problem with Data Localization’, Computer, 46(12): 5459,
Santoro, M. and Goldberg, W. (2009), ‘Fair Trade Suffers when China Censors the Internet: Its not just a human Rights Issue’, Huffington Post’, 8 January,
Svantesson, D. and Jerker, B. (2007), ‘Protecting Privacy on the ‘Borderless’ Internet – Some Thoughts on Extraterritoriality and Transborder Data Flow’, Bond Law Review, 19(1),
Tietje, C. (2011), ‘Global Information Law–Some Systemic Thoughts’, Institute of Economic Law Research Center, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Beitragezum Transnational Wirtschafsrect), Heft 107,
United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations (1982), Transnational Corporations and Transborder Data Flows, A Technical Paper.
United States International Trade Commission (2013), ‘Digital Trade in the US and Global Economies, Part 1′, Investigation No. 332-532, Publication 4415, July 2013.
United States International Trade Commission (2014), ‘Digital Trade in the US and Global Economies, Part 2′, Investigation No. 332-540, Publication 4485, August 2014.
Waz, J. and Weiser, P. (2012), ‘Internet Governance: The Role of Multistakeholder Organizations’, Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law. 10(2): 331, or
Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2006), ‘The Internet, Cross-Border Trade in Services and the GATS: Lessons from US Gambling’, World Trade Review, 5(3): 319355.

Why Trade Agreements are not Setting Information Free: The Lost History and Reinvigorated Debate over Cross-Border Data Flows, Human Rights, and National Security



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed