Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The WTO in an Era of Preferential Trade Agreements: Thick and Thin Institutions in Global Trade Governance

  • SILKE TROMMER (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This article examines how fragmentation of the global trade regime into preferential agreements, built on a multilateral baseline of World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, affects trade governance. The analysis relies on 105 interviews with trade policy professionals in core WTO members and a conceptual distinction between ‘thick’ and ‘thin’ institutionalism to capture institutional changes in the global trade governance architecture. The WTO's thick institutionalism facilitates institutionalized interactions among members of the trade policy community that are essential for transparency and dialogue and the rule of law character of the trade regime. It secures the continued belief of trade policy professionals in the WTO's centrality in trade governance. The thin institutionalism of the network of preferential agreements spells the return to à la carte forms of trade governance and benefits those with the technical and political capacity to successfully navigate the fragmented governance architecture. Ongoing institutional transformations shift global trade governance away from rules-based back to more power-based forms.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: silke.trommer@manchester.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

This project was supported by the Australian Research Council (Discovery Grant 120101634). Professor Ann Capling, University of Melbourne, designed the research project and secured research funding. We collectively built the sample and she participated in field work in India and China. I am deeply indebted to her for her mentorship and grateful for our continued friendship. I would also like to thank Marc Froese, Martin Björklund, and the reviewers for excellent feedback provided.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

V. Aggarwal and S. Evenett (2013), ‘A Fragmenting Global Economy: A Weakened WTO, Mega-FTAs, and Murky Protectionism’, Swiss Political Science Review, 19: 550557.

K. Alter and S. Meunier (2009), ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’, Perspectives on Politics, 7: 1324.

R. Baldwin and E. Seghezza (2010), ‘Are Trade Blocs Building or Stumbling Blocs?’, Journal of Economic Integration, 25: 276297.

J. Bhagwati (2008), Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

F. Biermann , P. Pattberg , H. van Asselt , and F. Zelli (2009), ‘The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis’, Global Environmental Politics, 9: 1440.

E. Blanchard (2015), ‘A Shifting Mandate: International Ownership, Global Fragmentation, and a Case for Deeper Integration under the WTO’, World Trade Review, 14: 8799.

C. Bown and J. Pauwelyn (2010), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

A. Capling and P. Low (2010), Negotiating Preferentially or Multilaterally? Governments, Non-State Actors and Trade Policy-Making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, and Geneva WTO.

A. Capling and J. Ravenhill (2011), ‘Multilateralising Regionalism: What Role for the Trans-Pacific-Partnership Agreement?’, The Pacific Review, 24: 553575.

T. Cottier (2007), ‘Preparing for Structural Reform in the WTO’, Journal for International Economic Law, 10: 497508.

C. Davis (2009), ‘Overlapping Institutions in Trade Policy’, Perspectives on Politics, 7: 2531.

A. DiCaprio and S. Trommer (2010), ‘Bilateral Graduation: The Impact of EPAs on LDC Trade Space’, Journal of Development Studies, 46: 16071627.

D. Drezner (2013), ‘The Tragedy of the Global Institutional Commons’, in M. Finnemore and J. Goldstein (eds.), Back to Basics: State Power in a Contemporary World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 280310.

P. Egger and M. Olarreaga (2014), ‘Introduction to the Special Issue on the Political Economy of Multilateral Trade Negotiations’, Review of International Organizations, 9: 135142.

M. Elsig and P. Stucki (2012), ‘Low-income Developing Countries and WTO Litigation: Why Wake Up a Sleeping Dog?’, Review of International Political Economy, 19: 292316.

S. Evenett (2014), ‘The Doha Round Impasse: A Graphical View’, Review of International Organizations, 9: 143162.

M. Froese (2016), ‘Mapping the Scope of Dispute Settlement in Regional Trade Agreements: Implications for the Multilateral Governance of Trade’, World Trade Review, 15: 563585.

A. Ghosh (2010), ‘Developing Countries in the WTO Trade Policy Review Mechanism’, World Trade Review, 9: 419455.

B. Hoekman (2014), ‘Sustaining Multilateral Trade Cooperation in a Multipolar World Economy’, Review of International Organizations, 9: 241260.

B. Hoekman and M. Kostecki (2001), The Political Economy of the World Trading System: WTO and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

J. Jackson (2002), ‘Perceptions about the WTO Trade Institutions’, World Trade Review, 1: 101114.

I. Kapoor (2004), ‘Deliberative Democracy and the WTO’, Review of International Political Economy, 11: 522541.

I. Kaul , I. Grunberg , and M. Stern (1999), Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century, New York: United Nations Development Programme and Oxford University Press.

M. Kim (2008), ‘Costly Procedures: Divergent Effects of Legalization in the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures’, International Studies Quarterly, 52: 657686.

G. Maggi and A. Rodríguez-Clare (1998), ‘The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures’, Journal of Political Economy, 106: 574601.

V. Muzaka and M. Bishop (2015), ‘Doha Stalemate: The End of Trade Multilateralism?’, Review of International Studies, 41: 383406.

M. Papa (2015), ‘Sustainable Global Governance? Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle Institutions’, Global Environmental Politics, 15: 120.

J. Pauwelyn (2005), ‘The Sutherland Report: A Missed Opportunity for Genuine Debate on Trade, Globalization and Reforming the WTO’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8: 329346.

T. Sattler and T. Bernauer (2011), ‘Gravitation or Discrimination? Determinants of Litigation in the World Trade Organization’, European Journal of Political Research, 50: 143167.

R. Wilkinson , E. Hannah , and J. Scott (2014), ‘The WTO in Bali: What MC9 Means for the Doha Development Agenda and Why it Matters’, Third World Quarterly, 35: 10321050.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 25
Total number of PDF views: 944 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 776 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd February 2017 - 27th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.