Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T15:34:30.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maternal ageing causes changes in DNA methylation and gene expression profiles in mouse oocytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2020

Guanmei Hou Open the ORCID record for Guanmei Hou [Opens in a new window]  and
Qing-Yuan Sun
Guanmei Hou
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao266109, China State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China
Qing-Yuan Sun*
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao266109, China State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China
*
Author for correspondence: Qing-Yuan Sun. State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China. E-mail: sunqy@ioz.ac.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Although it is well known that maternal ageing causes reduced oocyte quality and fertility, little information is known about its effect on germ cell epigenetics. In the present study, we compared the gene expression and DNA methylation profiles in germinal vesicle oocytes from young (8-week-old) and aged (18-month-old) mice using single-cell RNA-sequencing and single-cell whole-genome DNA methylation sequencing. We found significant differences in the data from the two groups. Oocytes from aged mice showed significant changes in the expression of some metabolism-related genes, such as mitochondria-associated genes, that was in line with our expectations. Expression of some genes associated with reproduction also showed significant differences. DNA methylation levels were also changed in oocytes from aged mice. The two groups had significant gaps in hypermethylation and hypomethylation levels on each chromosome. These data provide useful information for further understanding the mechanisms of oocyte ageing.

Keywords

Aged mouseDNA methylationGerminal vesicle prior oocytesSingle-cell sequencing

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 360 - 366
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Babayev, E and Seli, E (2015). Oocyte mitochondrial function and reproduction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 27, 175–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbieri, RL, Sluss, PM, Powers, RD, et al. (2005). Association of body mass index, age, and cigarette smoking with serum testosterone levels in cycling women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 83, 302–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blasco, MA, Lee, HW, Hande, MP, et al. (1997). Telomere shortening and tumor formation by mouse cells lacking telomerase RNA. Cell 91, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cil, AP, Turkgeldi, L, Seli, E. (2015). Oocyte cryopreservation as a preventive measure for age-related fertility loss. Semin Reprod Med 33, 429–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Hunt, PA and Hassold, TJ. (2008). Human female meiosis: what makes a good egg go bad?. Trends Genet 24, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lister, LM, Kouznetsova, A, Hyslop, LA, et al. (2010). Age-related meiotic segregation errors in mammalian oocytes are preceded by depletion of cohesin and Sgo2. Curr Biol 20, 1511–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLennan, M, Crichton, JH, Playfoot, CJ and Adams, IR (2015). Oocyte development, meiosis and aneuploidy. Semin Cell Dev Biol 45, 68–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mardis, ER (2008). The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics. Trends Genet 24, 133–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClintock, B (1939). The behavior in successive nuclear divisions of a chromosome broken at meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 25, 405–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merriman, JA, Jennings, PC, McLaughlin, EAet al. (2012). Effect of aging on superovulation efficiency, aneuploidy rates, and sister chromatid cohesion in mice aged up to 15 months. Biol Reprod 49, 1–6.Google Scholar
Mortazavi, A, Williams, BA, McCue, K, et al. (2008). Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-seq. Nat Methods 5, 621–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumann, AA and Reddel, RR (2002). Telomere maintenance and cancer – look, no telomerase. Nat Rev 2, 879–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okamoto, N, Kawamura, K, Kawamura, N, et al. (2013). Effects of maternal aging on expression of sirtuin genes in ovulated oocyte and cumulus cells. Ova Res 30, 24–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pertea, M, Kim, D, Pertea, GM, et al. (2016). Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc 11, 1650–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rambags, BP, van Boxtel, DC, Tharasanit, T, et al. (2014). Advancing maternal age predisposes to mitochondrial damage and loss during maturation of equine oocytes in vitro. Theriogenology 81, 959–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarzer, C, Siatkowski, M, Pfeiffer, MJ, et al. (2014). Maternal age effect on mouse oocytes: new biological insight from proteomic analysis. Reproduction 148, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seisenberger, S, Andrews, S, Krueger, F, et al. (2012). The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mol Cell 48, 849–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, T, Takahashi, E, Igarashi, H, et al. (2003). Impact of oxidative stress in aged mouse oocytes on calcium oscillations at fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev 66, 143–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yun, Y, Lane, SIR and Jones, KT (2014). Premature dyad separation in meiosis II is the major segregation error with maternal age in mouse oocytes. Development 141, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Hou and Sun supplementary material

Hou and Sun supplementary material

Download Hou and Sun supplementary material(File)
File 43.7 KB