Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:26:37.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simultaneous evaluation of plasma membrane integrity, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial membrane potential in bovine spermatozoa by flow cytometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2015

Chihiro Kanno ,
Sung-Sik Kang ,
Yasuyuki Kitade ,
Yojiro Yanagawa ,
Yoshiyuki Takahashi  and
Masashi Nagano
Chihiro Kanno
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Sung-Sik Kang
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Yasuyuki Kitade
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Yojiro Yanagawa
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Yoshiyuki Takahashi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Masashi Nagano*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku Kita 18 Nishi 9, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
*
All correspondence to: M. Nagano. Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku Kita 18 Nishi 9, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan. Tel:/Fax: +81 11 706 5231. E-mail: mnaga@vetmed.hokudai.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The present study aimed to develop an objective evaluation procedure to estimate the plasma membrane integrity, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial membrane potential of bull spermatozoa simultaneously by flow cytometry. Firstly, we used frozen–thawed semen mixed with 0, 25, 50, 75 or 100% dead spermatozoa. Semen was stained using three staining solutions: SYBR-14, propidium iodide (PI), and phycoerythrin-conjugated peanut agglutinin (PE–PNA), for the evaluation of plasma membrane integrity and acrosomal integrity. Then, characteristics evaluated by flow cytometry and by fluorescence microscopy were compared. Characteristics of spermatozoa (viability and acrosomal integrity) evaluated by flow cytometry and by fluorescence microscopy were found to be similar. Secondly, we attempted to evaluate the plasma membrane integrity, acrosomal integrity, and also mitochondrial membrane potential of spermatozoa by flow cytometry using conventional staining with three dyes (SYBR-14, PI, and PE–PNA) combined with MitoTracker Deep Red (MTDR) staining (quadruple staining). The spermatozoon characteristics evaluated by flow cytometry using quadruple staining were then compared with those of staining using SYBR-14, PI, and PE–PNA and staining using SYBR-14 and MTDR. There were no significant differences in all characteristics (viability, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial membrane potential) evaluated by quadruple staining and the other procedures. In conclusion, quadruple staining using SYBR-14, PI, PE–PNA, and MTDR for flow cytometry can be used to evaluate the plasma membrane integrity, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial membrane potential of bovine spermatozoa simultaneously.

Keywords

Acrosomal integrityBovine spermatozoaFlow cytometryMitochondrial membrane potentialSpermatozoon viability
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , August 2016 , pp. 529 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaral, A., Lourenço, B., Marques, M. & Ramalho-Santos, J. (2013). Mitochondria functionality and sperm quality. Reproduction 146, 163–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brito, L.F.C., Silva, A., Rodrigues, L.H., Vieira, F.V., Deragon, L.A.G. & Kastelic, J.P. (2002). Effect of age and genetic group on characteristics of the scrotum, testes and testicular vascular cones, and on sperm production and semen quality in AI bulls in Brazil. Theriogenology 58, 1175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celeghini, E.C., de Arruda, R.P., de Andrade, A.F., Nascimento, J. & Raphael, C.F. (2007). Practical techniques for bovine sperm simultaneous fluorimetric assessment of plasma, acrosomal and mitochondrial membranes. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 42, 479–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Den Daas, J.H., De Jong, G., Lansbergen, L.M. & Van Wagtendonk-De Leeuw, A. M. (1998). The relationship between the number of spermatozoa inseminated and the reproductive efficiency of individual dairy bulls. J. Dairy. Sci. 81, 1714–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J.K. & Mocé, E. (2005). Fertility evaluation of frozen/thawed semen. Theriogenology 64, 492–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallap, T., Nagy, S., Jaakma, U., Johannisson, A. & Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2005). Mitochondrial activity of frozen-thawed spermatozoa assessed by MitoTracker Deep Red 633. Theriogenology 63, 2311–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammerstedt, R.H., Graham, J.K. & Nolan, J.P. (1990). Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: what we ask them to survive. J. Androl. 11, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, R.A. & Vickers, S.E. (1990). Use of fluorescent probes to assess membrane integrity in mammalian spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 88, 343–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linford, E., Glover, F.A., Bishop, C. & Stewart, D.L. (1976). The relationship between semen evaluation methods and fertility in the bull. J. Reprod. Fertil. 47, 283–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Pastor, F., Mata-Campuzano, M., Álvarez-Rodríguez, M., Alvarez, M., Anel, L. & De Paz, P. (2010). Probes and techniques for sperm evaluation by flow cytometry. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 45, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagy, S., Jansen, J., Topper, E.K. & Gadella, B.M. (2003). A triple-stain flow cytometric method to assess plasma- and acrosome-membrane integrity of cryopreserved bovine sperm immediately after thawing in presence of egg-yolk particles. Biol. Reprod. 68, 1828–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, P. F. & Gadella, B.M. (2006). Detection of damage in mammalian sperm cells. Theriogenology 65, 958–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somfai, T., Bodó, S., Nagy, S., Papp, A.B., Ivancsics, J., Baranyai, B., Gocza, E. & Kovacs, A. (2002). Effect of swim up and Percoll treatment on viability and acrosome integrity of frozen–thawed bull spermatozoa. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 37, 285–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Söderquist, L., Janson, L., Larsson, K. & Einarsson, S. (1991). Sperm morphology and fertility in A.I. bulls. J. Vet. Med. A 38, 534–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, C.A., Garner, D.L., DeJarnette, J.M. & Marshall, C.E. (1998). Effect of cryopreservation of bovine sperm organelle function and viability as determined by flow cytometry. Biol. Reprod. 58, 786–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, P., Underwood, S., Dolbec, C., Bouchard, N., Kroetsch, T. & Blondin, P. (2012). Bovine semen quality control in artificial insemination centers. Anim. Reprod. 9, 153–65.Google Scholar
Watson, P.F. (2000). The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 60–61, 481–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed