Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-9prln Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-05T17:26:05.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesis of nano-metakaolin using mechanical activation: effects of various parameters on the activated material properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2025

Dimitra Kosmidi*
Affiliation:
National and Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Zografos, Greece
Konstantinos Betsis
Affiliation:
National and Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Zografos, Greece
Lefkothea Sakellariou
Affiliation:
National and Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Zografos, Greece
Maria Taxiarchou
Affiliation:
National and Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Zografos, Greece
Efstratios Badogiannis
Affiliation:
National and Technical University of Athens, School of Civil Engineering, Zografos, Greece
Sofia Makri
Affiliation:
Creative Nano PC, Metamorfosi, Greece
*
Corresponding author: Dimitra Kosmidi; Email: dkosmidi@metal.ntua.gr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aims to synthesize nano-metakaolin (NMK) through mechanical activation and to investigate the physical, chemical and microstructural changes that occur to the initial raw material. The efficiency of the activation process is affected by various process parameters as well as the mineralogy of the original material. Two different kaolin qualities were subjected to mechanical activation through high-energy ball-milling (HEBM) under various conditions. The parameters investigated were the milling speed and time. The final properties of the NMK samples produced were examined using X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, laser dynamic light scattering, thermogravimetry/differential thermal analysis, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Additionally, the pozzolanic activity of the fully activated samples was evaluated using the Chapelle test. The percentage of impurities contained in the initial kaolin affected the transformation into metakaolin. The milling parameters also affected the activation, contributing mainly to the particle size of the final material. Finally, concerning the metakaolin microstructure, the material showed a tendency to form stacks and agglomerates of plates due to the development of powerful static forces.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Figure 0

Table 1. Chemical compositions of the raw kaolin samples and commercial MK (% w/w).

Figure 1

Figure 1. XRD trace for Metastar.  K= kaolinite; Q = quartz.

Figure 2

Table 2. Process parameters of the mechanically activated kaolin.

Figure 3

Figure 2. FTIR spectrum of Metastar.

Figure 4

Table 3. Infrared band positions and band assignments of Metastar.

Figure 5

Table 4. Particle-size (µm) distribution results of Metastar.

Figure 6

Table 5. Chapelle test results for Metastar.

Figure 7

Figure 3. DTA and TG curves of Metastar.

Figure 8

Figure 4. XRD trace for kaolin Polwhite E. F = feldspar minerals; K = kaolinite; M = mica minerals; Q = quartz.

Figure 9

Figure 5. XRD traces of mechanically activated products of kaolin Polwhite E at 520 rpm.

Figure 10

Figure 6. XRD traces of mechanically activated products of kaolin Polwhite E at 650 rpm.

Figure 11

Figure 7. FTIR spectra of kaolin Polwhite E and corresponding mechanically activated products at 520 rpm.

Figure 12

Figure 8. FTIR spectra of kaolin Polwhite E and corresponding mechanically activated products at 650 rpm.

Figure 13

Figure 9. DTA and TG curves of kaolin Polwhite E and its mechanically activated products.

Figure 14

Table 6. Weight loss (%) of kaolin polwhite e and its mechanically activated samples.

Figure 15

Table 7. Particle-size (µm) distribution results of kaolin Polwhite E.

Figure 16

Table 9. BET specific surface areas and average pore diameters of the Polwhite E samples.

Figure 17

Table 10. Chapelle test results for all of the mechanically treated samples and commercial MK.

Figure 18

Table 11. Infrared band positions (cm–1) and band assignments of kaolin Polwhite E and its mechanically activated products.

Figure 19

Table 8. Particle-size (nm) distribution results of kaolin Polwhite E mechanically activated samples.

Figure 20

Figure 10. SEM images of mechanically activated kaolin Polwhite E samples ground at 520 rpm for (a) 30 min, (b) 60 min and (c) 120 min and at 650 rpm for (d) 15 min, (e) 30 min and (f) 60 min. scale bars = 10 μm.

Figure 21

Table 13. Weight loss (%) of kaolin Supreme and its mechanically activated products.

Figure 22

Table 14. Particle-size (µ) distribution results of kaolin Supreme.

Figure 23

Table 16. BET results for specific surface area and average pore diameter of all Supreme samples.

Figure 24

Table 17. Chapelle test results for the kaolin Supreme mechanically treated samples.

Figure 25

Figure 11. XRD trace of kaolin Supreme. K = kaolinite; M = mica; Q = quartz.

Figure 26

Figure 12. XRD traces of mechanically activated samples of kaolin Supreme at 520 rpm. K = kaolinite; M = mica; Q = quartz.

Figure 27

Figure 13. XRD traces of mechanically activated samples of kaolin Supreme at 650 rpm. K = kaolinite; M = mica; Q = quartz.

Figure 28

Figure 14. FTIR spectra of kaolin Supreme and its mechanically activated products at 520 rpm.

Figure 29

Figure 15. FTIR spectra of kaolin Supreme and its mechanically activated products at 650 rpm.

Figure 30

Table 12. Infrared bands and band assignments of kaolin Supreme and its mechanically activated products.

Figure 31

Figure 16. DTA and TG curves of kaolin Supreme and mechanically activated products.

Figure 32

Table 15. Particle-size (nm) distribution results of kaolin Supreme mechanically activated samples.

Figure 33

Figure 17. SEM images of mechanically activated kaolin Supreme samples ground at 520 rpm for (a) 30 min, (b) 60 min and (c) 120 min and at 650 rpm for (d) 15 min, (e) 30 min and (f) 60 min. scale bars = 10 μm.