Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-rxg44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T21:38:44.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2009

J Keir ,
J English  and
N Fergie
J Keir*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester, UK
J English
Affiliation:
Department of Dermatology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
N Fergie
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr James Keir, Department of Otolaryngology, Countess of Chester Hospital, Liverpool Road, Chester CH2 1UL, UK. E-mail: jameskeir@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A deterioration in chronic inflammatory ear disease despite topical medication, or failure of the condition to improve with such treatment, should raise the possibility of allergic contact dermatitis. Allergen testing (patch testing) is the ‘gold standard’ method of identifying an agent causing allergic contact dermatitis.

We describe an ENT patch test series applied by our department as a screening device for this condition.

Keywords

AllergyPatch TestingOtology

Information

Type
Short Communications
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 123 , Issue 5 , May 2009 , pp. 558 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Fraki, JE, Kalimo, K, Tuohimaa, P, Aantaa, E. Contact allergy to various components of topical preparations for treatment of external otitis. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1985;100:414–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Smith, IM, Keay, DG, Buxton, PK. Contact hypersensitivity in patients with chronic otitis externa. Clin Otolaryngol 1990;15:155–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Van Ginkel, CJW, Bruintjes, TD, Huizing, EH. Allergy due to topical medications in chronic otitis externa and chronic otitis media. Clin Otolaryngol 1995;20:326–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Holmes, RC, Johns, AN, Wilkinson, JD, Black, MM. Medicament contact dermatitis in patients with chronic inflammatory ear disease. J R Soc Med 1982;75:27–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Wilkinson, JD. The external ear. In: Champion, RH, Burton, JL, Ebling, FJG, eds. Rook/Wilkinson/Ebling Textbook of Dermatology, 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992;2671–88Google Scholar
6 Forstrom Pirila, V, Pirila, L. Cross-sensitivity within the neomycin group of antibiotics. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1979;85:67–9Google Scholar
7 Guin, JD, Phillips, D. Erythroderma from systemic contact dermatitis: a complication of systemic gentamicin in a patient with contact allergy to neomycin. Cutis 1989;43:564–7Google Scholar
8 Sood, S, Strachan, DR, Tsikoudas, A, Stables, GI. Allergic otitis externa. Clin Oto 2002;27:233–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Vanarsdel, PP, Larson, EB. Diagnostic tests for patients with suspected allergic disease. Utility Limitations Ann Intern Med 1990;110:304–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Beltrani, VS, Beltrani, VP. Contact, dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997;78:160–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar