Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g98kq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T02:19:18.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Does Kant Think We Must Believe in the Immortal Soul?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2019

Jessica Tizzard Open the ORCID record for Jessica Tizzard [Opens in a new window]
Jessica Tizzard*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Making sense of Kant’s claim that it is morally necessary for us to believe in the immortal soul is a historically fraught issue. Commentators typically reject it, or take one of two paths: they either restrict belief in the immortal soul to our subjective psychology, draining it of any substantive rational grounding; or make it out to be a rational necessity that morally interested beings must accept on pain of contradiction. Against these interpreters, I argue that on Kant’s view, belief in our immortality is necessary because it further determines and enriches the cognitive content contained in the concept of the highest good. Through this sharpened conceptual content, we acquire the resources to withstand theoretical skepticism about our moral vocation.

Keywords

Kanthistory of philosophymoral psychologyphilosophy of religion

Information

Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 114 - 129
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Denis, Lara. 2005. “Autonomy and the Highest Good.” Kantian Review 10: 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415400002120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojanowski, Jochen. 2016. “Life without Death: Why Kantian Agents Are Committed to the Belief in Their Own Immortality.” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy, edited by Höwing, Thomas, 181–98. Boston: Berlin.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. 1992. “The Concept of the Highest Good in Kant’s Moral Theory.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4): 747–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2000. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahmann, Andree. 2018. “Kant’s Critical Argument(s) for Immorality Reassessed.” Kant Yearbook 10 (1): 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2018-0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insole, Christopher. 2008. “The Irreducible Importance of Religious Hope in Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good.” Philosophy 83 (3): 333–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819108000703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. “Critique of Practical Reason.” Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Gregor, Mary. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.” Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Gregor, Mary. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. “Lectures on the Philosophical Doctrine of Religion.” Religion and Rational Theology. Translated and edited by di Giovanni, George and Wood, Allen. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. “Metaphysics of Morals.” Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Gregor, Mary. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason.” Religion and Rational Theology. Translated and edited by di Giovanni, George and Wood, Allen. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgement. Translated by Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric, edited by Guyer, Paul. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, Markus. 2015. “Kant on the Inapplicability of the Categories to Things in Themselves.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1): 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2014.978838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen. 2013. “The Idea of Immortality as an Imaginative Projection of an Indefinite Moral Future.” In Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, 919–929. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Peters, Julia. 2018. “Kant’s Gesinnung.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (3): 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2018.0049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews. 1988. “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (4): 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1988.0098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surprenant, Chris W. 2008. “Kant’s Postulate of the Immortality of the Soul.” International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq200848127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tizzard, Jessica. 2018. “Space, Time, and Respect for the Moral Law as Analogous Formal Elements of Sensibility.” European Journal of Philosophy 26(1): 630–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, Owen. 2014. “Kant on Moral Sensibility and Moral Motivation.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (4): 727–46. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2014.0090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. 1970. Kant’s Moral Religion. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar