Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T09:33:52.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mineralogy, in situ trace element geochemistry, and C–O isotopic composition of contaminated allanite-bearing Khaderpet carbonatite: insights regarding magmatic and supergene processes

150 years of the Mineralogical Society: Past Discoveries and Future Frontiers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2026

Sourav Bhattacharjee*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Climate Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Tirupati, Tirupati District, AP, India Department of Geology, Rhodes University, Makhanda, Eastern Cape, South Africa
Aniket Chakrabarty
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Climate Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Tirupati, Tirupati District, AP, India
Roger H. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
Daisuke Araoka
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Yoshiaki Kon
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Mihoko Hoshino
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Shota Satori
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Ganqing Jiang
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA
*
Corresponding author: Sourav Bhattacharjee; Email: sourav.bhattacharjee@ru.ac.za
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Khaderpet carbonatite (15°58′N, 77°33′E) occurs as a small plug-like intrusion (45 m × 60 m) within altered ultramafic volcaniclastic breccia of unknown parentage. Both the carbonatite and its host rock contain crustal xenoliths of granite and quartz monzonite. Although the absence of primary silicate and oxide phases obscures its direct genetic link with the host rocks, the carbonatite preserves clear evidence of magmatic crystallization subsequently overprinted by hydrothermal alteration, crustal assimilation and supergene oxidation. The rock is dominated by calcite, which occurs in three distinct generations. Early Sr-Ba-rich calcite-1 (0.8–2.1 wt.% SrO and 0.4–2.2 wt.% BaO) phenocrysts co-crystallized with rounded fluorite at temperatures above ∼600°C, and are hosted within a Ba-Sr-poor calcite-2 matrix. Mantle-like bulk-rock δ13C values (–4.21 to –4.62 ‰, VPDB), together with (La/Yb)Cn (>1–100) and Y/Ho (24–34) ratios in calcite-1 and calcite-2, support a primary magmatic origin. Evidence for crustal assimilation includes REE-Si enrichment in apatite (up to 1.3 wt.% SiO2) by a britholite-type substitution, increased allanite abundance near xenolith contacts, Si-rich pyrochlore and interstitial quartz. Coarse calcite-3 veins crosscut the calcite-2 matrix and comprise Mn-Fe-Mg-rich bright calcite-3a cores and nearly pure, dark calcite-3b peripheries. Elevated Mn-Fe-Mg contents and high Y/Ho ratios (up to 64) in calcite-3a reflect rapid crystallization during waning hydrothermal stages. High δ18O values (+9.17 to +11.54 ‰ VSMOW) indicate low-temperature H2O-rich, CO2-poor meteoric fluid alteration. Negative Ce anomalies in apatite (Ce/Ce*: 0.8–0.3) and calcite (Ce/Ce*: 0.8–0.4), most pronounced in calcite-3b (Ce/Ce*: 0.2–0.6), together with apatite trace element compositions, indicate supergene alteration. Textural evidence of supergene alteration includes replacement of pyrochlore-1 by pyrochlore-2, pyrochlore-1 and pyrite by goethite, allanite-(La) by ferriallanite-(Ce), and late precipitation of baryte, REE-fluorocarbonates and vanadinite, indicating involvement of F, SO42–, Pb and V in oxidizing hydrothermal fluids.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Generalized geological map of the Wajrakarur Kimberlite Field, Eastern Dharwar Craton, southern India, showing the main kimberlite clusters: Wajrakarur–Lattavaram, Timmasamudram, Kalyandurg, and Chigicherla (modified after Nayak and Kudari, 1999). The inset map illustrates the distribution of kimberlite and lamproite fields across southern India. (b) Schematic geological map and (c) cross-section of the Khaderpet pipe. (d) Plan-view map of the carbonatite outcrops.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a, b) Field photographs showing occurrences of mm-to-cm scale angular-to-subrounded granite clasts hosted by volcaniclastic silicate host rocks and grey calcite carbonatite. Inset image in (b) shows a hand-specimen image of the carbonatite with a supergene assemblage of goethite (Gth) and allanite-(Ce) (Aln-Ce) at its surface and a late calcite (Cal) vein. (c) Transmitted light photomicrograph showing disseminated anhedral fluorite (Flr) and Aln-Ce crystals in a fine-grained, equigranular calcite matrix. (d) Back-scattered electron (BSE) image showing disseminated anhedral Flr and fine-grained apatite (Ap) clusters commonly overgrown by Aln-Ce, with late-stage residual quartz (Qz), baryte (Brt), and accessory Gth within the Cal matrix. (e, f) Hand-specimen and transmitted-light photomicrograph showing calcite carbonatite hosting granite xenoliths with reddish-brown goethite alteration zones, displaying variable degrees of alteration and an assemblage dominated by Aln, Qz, Cal and Brt along the carbonatite-xenolith contact. A hammer (42 cm in length; a and b) and coins with diameters of 27 mm (b, inset) and 23 mm (e) are used for scale.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Back-scattered electron (BSE) images (a–d, f–i) and a transmitted-light photomicrograph (e) illustrating the textural characteristics of the different calcite (Cal) types. (a–d) Cal-1 forms bright rhombohedral phenocrysts showing both oscillatory and intermediate-AZ patchy zoning, and is commonly fragmented, resorbed and partially replaced by the darker Cal-2 matrix. (e) Coarse Cal-3 veins crosscut the fine-grained Cal-2 matrix. (f–i) BSE images show that Cal-3 veins comprise two subzones: a bright Cal-3a core and a darker Cal-3b rim. Cal-3a typically displays rhythmic zoning with alternating bright and dark bands of variable thickness, and encloses rhombohedral relicts of Cal-1 pseudomorphed by Cal-2. Cal-3b is intergrown with late hydrothermal quartz (Qz) and baryte (Brt).

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a–d) Binary plots illustrating the compositional variation among the different calcite (Cal) types based on CaO, SrO, BaO, FeO, MgO and MnO (wt.%). Cal-1 displays exceptionally high SrO and BaO contents relative to the other calcite types, whereas Cal-3a is enriched in FeO, MgO and shows the highest MnO concentrations. (e–h) X-ray elemental maps highlight these trends, with (e) Cal-1 showing significantly elevated Sr relative to the surrounding Cal-2 matrix and (f–h) Cal-3a veins exhibiting higher Mn, Mg and Fe contents compared to Cal-3b. Inset image (f) show the presence of relict Sr-rich Cal-1 in Cal-2 matrix overgrown by Mn-Fe-Mg rich Cal-3a adjacent to the Cal-3 vein.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) Chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns for calcite. Most calcite types (Cal-1, Cal-2 and Cal-3a) show pronounced light REE (LREE) enrichment and overlapping compositions. Normalizing values are from McDonough and Sun (1995). For comparison, hydrothermal calcite from Turiy Mys (yellow) and supergene calcite from Bear Lodge (blue) are also shown (data source: Chakhmouradian et al., 2016b). (b) All calcite types exhibit negative Ce anomalies. Calcite-3b is distinguished by its very low heavy REE (HREE) concentrations and its strongest negative Ce anomalies. (c, d) Concentrations of REE, Na, Sr and Ba decrease progressively from Cal-1 to Cal-2, Cal-3a and Cal-3b. The inset plot in (d) demonstrates a systematic decrease in Sr and Ce/Ce* from Cal-1 to Cal-2, Cal-3a and Cal-3b, consistent with a progressive supergene oxidation signature in calcite.

Figure 5

Table 1. Minimum–maximum values and standard deviations of major oxide compositions in calcite

Figure 6

Table 2. Minimum–maximum ranges and standard deviations of trace element concentrations in calcite

Figure 7

Figure 6. Back-scattered electron (BSE) images (a–e) show that apatite (Ap) occurs as fine-grained clusters, commonly confined to linear bands. These are locally overgrown by allanite-(Ce) (Aln-Ce) and are associated with late interstitial quartz (Qz) and REE-fluorocarbonates (REE-FC). Baryte (Brt) and a bright, compositionally complex phase enriched in REE, Nb, Pb and Si (Unk REE-Nb-Pb-Si) occur interstitially to Ap (e). (f) X-ray map revealing that the apatite rims and the unknown REE-Nb-Pb-Si phase exhibit elevated Si contents.

Figure 8

Figure 7. (a) Apatite compositions display a strong positive correlation between REE2O3 and SiO2 (wt.%) contents (R2 = 0.87), consistent with a britholite-type substitution mechanism. (b) Chondrite-normalised trace element pattern for apatite shows LREE-enrichment. Some apatite crystals display an irregular, zigzag REE pattern and with both positive and negative Ce anomalies. Normalizing values are from McDonough and Sun (1995). The magmatic and supergene apatite compositions from Kovdor, Sokli, Glenover, Bukusu and Catalão I are shown for comparison (Broom-Fendley et al., 2021).

Figure 9

Figure 8. (a–e) Back-scattered electron (BSE) images (a–e) and X-ray maps (f–h) showing textural relationships among allanite-(Ce, La) (Aln-Ce, -La), baryte (Brt), pyrochlore (Pcl), goethite (Gth), and REE-fluorocarbonate (REE-FC). (a) Aln-Ce, -La forms needle-like aggregates characterised by bright cores and darker rims, corresponding to Aln-La and Aln-Ce compositions, respectively. (b–c) Dark Aln-Ce rims and linear zones commonly intergrow with baryte. (d) Colloform and box-work Gth contain relict Pcl inclusions enclosed within skeletal Aln-Ce. (e) Ap is pseudomorphically replaced by Aln-Ce and accompanied by late-stage REE-FC. The REE-FC displays elevated Ce and F concentrations relative to Aln-Ce and Ap (f–h).

Figure 10

Figure 9. (a) Compositional variations of epidote-group minerals plotted in the Fe2+–Mg2+–(Al + Fe3+) ternary diagram (after Gieré and Sorensen, 2004) illustrate a range extending from allanite–ferriallanite compositions toward the epidote–clinozoisite–oxyallanite fields. (b) Bivariate plot of REE + Y + Th + Mn + Sr versus total Al (Alᵀ, apfu) (modified from Petrik, 1995) showing pronounced REE enrichment in the epidote-group minerals. The shaded fields represent compositional ranges of epidote-group phases from carbonatite (green) and clinopyroxenite (yellow) lithologies of the Hogenakkal carbonatite complex (Bhattacharjee et al., 2024), and from the Pakkanadu (violet) (Mahapatro et al.,2023) and Gundlupete (Brahma et al., 2022) carbonatites.

Figure 11

Table 3. Representative compositions of allanite-(La, Ce)

Figure 12

Figure 10. (a, b) Back-scattered electron (BSE) images showing dark pyrochlore (Pcl-1) partially to completely replaced by bright Pcl-2. Patchy-zoned pyrochlore occurs as late infillings within apatite (Ap) (inset in b), where the darker zones (Pcl-1) gradually grade into brighter Pcl-2. (c) Bright Pcl-2 occurs in vugs adjacent to allanite-(Ce) (Aln-Ce) within a calcite-2 (Cal-2) matrix. (d–f) Compositional plots show that the pyrochlore compositions fall within the pyrochlore-group field in the Nb–Ta–Ti ternary diagram (Atencio et al., 2010). In the Si–Nb–Ti ternary plot, compositions range from typical pyrochlore to Si-rich varieties. In the Ca–Na–A-site vacancy diagram (after Nasraoui and Bilal, 2000), Pcl-1 plots mainly within the hydrothermal field, whereas Pcl-2 trends toward the supergene field. The light blue field representing hydrothermal pyrochlore is from Bhattacharjee et al. (2022).

Figure 13

Table 4. Representative composition of pyrochlore-group minerals

Figure 14

Figure 11. (a–c) Back-scattered electron (BSE) images showing late-stage intergrowths of baryte (Brt), REE-fluorocarbonate (REE-FC), goethite (Gth), and quartz (Qz) occurring interstitially between apatite (Ap) and calcite-2 (Cal-2). (d) BSE image with corresponding elemental X-ray maps (e–f) illustrating the intergrowth of REE-FC and Qz, characterized by elevated F and La concentrations. The inset X-ray map in (d) highlights enhanced Si, confirming the intergrowth of Qz with REE-FC.

Figure 15

Figure 12. Bulk-rock stable carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions (δ13CVPDB vs δ18OVSMOW) of the Khaderpet carbonatite. Fields for primary igneous carbonate (PIC) are modified from Jones et al. (2013) (Field 1), Taylor et al. (1967) (Field 2) and the primary carbonatite carbonate (CBT) field is reproduced from Clark et al. (1991); the field for fresh natrocarbonatite is from Keller and Hoefs (1995) and Jones et al. (2013). Dashed arrows illustrate potential evolutionary or alteration trends affecting the isotopic systematics, including seawater interaction, fractional crystallization and carbo(hydro)thermal alteration. The inset highlights enrichment in δ18O at nearly constant δ13C, interpreted as reflecting low-temperature alteration by H2O-rich, CO2-poor meteoric–hydrothermal fluids (after Demény et al., 1998; Ray and Ramesh, 2006).

Figure 16

Figure 13. (La/Yb)Cn vs Y/Ho diagram showing that most calcite-1 (Cal-1) and calcite-2 (Cal-2) compositions plot within the magmatic field, overlapping those of Aley and Sevattur, with some data trending toward the Turiy Mys hydrothermal field. In contrast, the majority of calcite-3a (Cal-3a) exhibits elevated Y/Ho ratios (>34), consistent with hydrothermal reworking. (b) TREE (total rare earth element) versus Ce/Ce* illustrates that the Cal-1, Cal-2 and Cal-3a show negative Ce anomalies comparable to Kerimasi calcite, whereas Cal-3b displays stronger negative-Ce anomalies, trending towards the supergene calcite field characteristic of Bear Lodge. Inset Eu/Eu* vs Ce/Ce* plot shows that all calcite data cluster within the Kerimasi field. Eu/Eu*: EuCn/(0.5SmCn + 0.5GdCn) and Ce/Ce*: CeCn/(0.5LaCn + 0.5PrCn), where Cn corresponds to chondrite normalized (normalizing values are from Anders and Grevesse, 1989); CHARAC range indicated by dotted lines in (a) (Bau, 1996). The coloured fields represent magmatic and hydrothermal and supergene calcite from global carbonatite occurrences (data source: Chakhmouradian et al., 2016b; Ranta et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2023; Dey et al., 2024).

Figure 17

Figure 14. (a) Detailed paragenetic sequence illustrating the major, minor and accessory mineral assemblages across the magmatic, late-magmatic and supergene stages. Dotted lines represent mineral replacement, breakdown, or transformations linking successive generations. (b–d) Schematic representations of the magmatic, late-magmatic and supergene stages, respectively, depicting the progressive evolution and fluid–rock interaction processes responsible for the evolution of the Khaderpet carbonatite.

Supplementary material: File

Bhattacharjee et al. supplementary material 1

Bhattacharjee et al. supplementary material
Download Bhattacharjee et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 223.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bhattacharjee et al. supplementary material 2

Bhattacharjee et al. supplementary material
Download Bhattacharjee et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 177.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bhattacharjee et al. supplementary material 3

Bhattacharjee et al. supplementary material
Download Bhattacharjee et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 7 MB