Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T03:24:53.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrothermal carbonization of invasive plant biomass as a tool for its safe utilization and production of artificial humic substances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Maris Klavins*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Environmental Science, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
Linda Ansone-Bertina
Affiliation:
Senior Researcher, Department of Environmental Science, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
Janis Krumins
Affiliation:
Senior Researcher, Department of Environmental Science, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
Oskars Purmalis
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Science, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
Laura Klavina
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Science, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
Zane Vincevica-Gaile
Affiliation:
Leading Researcher, Department of Environmental Science, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
*
Corresponding author: Maris Klavins; Email: maris.klavins@lu.lv
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Invasive plants may cause significant environmental risks by affecting biological diversity, ecosystem services, agriculture, and forestry. Safe utilization of invasive plant biomass by obtaining new outcome products useful for bioeconomics is a challenging but promising solution. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) presents a sustainable and cost-effective approach to transforming invasive plant biomass into new products while simultaneously supporting carbon capture aims. This study utilized invasive plants such as lupine [Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl.], Sosnowsky’s hogweed [Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden.], and Japanese knotweed [Polygonum cuspidatum Siebold & Zucc.] as biomass sources for HTC to produce artificial humic substances (AHS). The greatest impact on the yield of AHS (maximum gained yield of 62%) was the duration of the HTC process (up to 6 h) and temperature of the treatment (from 160 up to 250 C), as well as the catalyst used (an alkaline medium is preferable). During the HTC treatment, significant changes in the invasive plant biomass composition occur, as indicated by the removal of labile components of organic matter. The AHS obtained are essentially similar to natural humic matter and have biostimulatory properties; thus, they can be applied in agriculture and other areas of bioeconomics.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America
Figure 0

Table 1. Elemental composition of investigated invasive plant biomass

Figure 1

Figure 1. Characterization of the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process applied to biomass of invasive plants (Heracleum sosnowskyi, Lupinus polyphyllus, and Polygonum cuspidatum): (A) organic carbon content in artificial humic acids (AHA), hydrochar (HC), and fulvic acids and low-molecular-weight organic compounds (FA+LMWOC); (B) the effect of pH on the yield of AHA; (C) the impact of the reaction duration time on the yield of AHA; (D) the effect of temperature on the yield of AHA.

Figure 2

Table 2. Elemental composition of artificial humic acids (AHA) produced by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) from invasive plant biomass during this study and humic acids obtained from peat (Klavins and Purmalis 2013) and soil (Rashad et al. 2022) for reference

Figure 3

Figure 2. Ultraviolet-visible (UV/Vis) spectra (A) and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra (B) of artificial humic acids (AHA) obtained by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) from biomass of invasive plants (Lupinus polyphyllus, Heracleum sosnowskyi, and Polygonum cuspidatum) compared with peat-based humic acid (PHA) and standardized reference humic acid (RHA; Sigma-Aldrich).

Figure 4

Figure 3. Excitation–emission matrices of artificial humic acids (AHA) obtained by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) from biomass of invasive plants (Lupinus polyphyllus, Heracleum sosnowskyi, and Polygonum cuspidatum) compared with reference peat-based humic acid.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Thermogravimetric analysis of artificial humic acids (AHA) obtained by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) from biomass of invasive plants (Heracleum sosnowskyi, Lupinus polyphyllus, and Polygonum cuspidatum) compared with standardized reference humic acid (RHA; Sigma-Aldrich).

Figure 6

Figure 5. Relative changes in early plant development of tested species (white mustard [Sinapis alba], gardencress pepperweed [Lepidium sativum] and wheat [Triticum aestivum]) expressed as shoot and root length across a concentration range of applied solution of artificial humic substances (AHS) obtained during the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) from invasive plants (Lupinus polyphyllus, Heracleum sosnowskyi, and Polygonum cuspidatum) compared with reference peat-based humic acid (PHA) solutions, ranging from 25 mg L−1 to 1,000 mg L−1.