Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lrvh5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T06:44:52.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Natural History of My Inward Self”: Sensing Character in George Eliot's Impressions of Theophrastus Such

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

S. Pearl Brilmyer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large body of Eliot scholarship is dedicated to the question of human sympathy. My essay moves in a different direction, arguing that Eliot saw literature not only as a medium for intersubjective understanding but also as an amplificatory technology, a tool for sensory enhancement. This technology is embodied by the affective dynamics of character in Eliot's final published work, Impressions of Theophrastus Such (1879), a collection of character sketches and philosophical essays composed in conversation with the ancient Greek naturalist and sketch writer Theophrastus of Eresus. In Impressions Eliot invokes the descriptive traditions of natural history and the character sketch to suggest that human beings, like other animals, are conditioned by bodily frameworks and habitual responses that allow them to sense some things and not others. A meditation also on the history of characterization itself, Impressions puts pressure on the modern association of character with individual human psychology.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 129 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 35 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Ablow, Rachel, ed. The Feeling of Reading: Affective Experience and Victorian Literature. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2010. Print.10.3998/mpub.364448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Amanda. The Powers of Distance: Cosmopolitanism and the Cultivation of Detachment. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2001. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Isobel. “Middlemarch: A Note on George Eliot's ‘Wisdom.‘” Critical Essays on George Eliot. Ed. Hardy, Barbara Nathan. New York: Routledge, 1970. 116–32. Print.Google Scholar
Baltussen, Han. Theophrastus against the Presocratics and Plato: Peripatetic Dialectic in the De sensibus. Leiden: Brill Academic, 2000. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Carp-, Comb. Form.” The Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford UP, 2011. Web. 11 Oct. 2011.Google Scholar
“Carp, N1.” The Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford UP, 2011. Web. 11 Oct. 2011.Google Scholar
“Carp, N2.” The Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford UP, 2011. Web. 11 Oct. 2011.Google Scholar
“Carp, V1.” The Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford UP, 2011. Web. 11 Oct. 2011.Google Scholar
Cole, Eve Browning. “Theophrastus and Aristotle on Animal Intelligence.” Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings. Ed. Fortenbaugh, William W. and Gutas, Dimitri. New Brunswick: Transaction, 1992. 44–62. Print.Google Scholar
Collins, K. K. “Questions of Method: Some Unpublished Late Essays”. Nineteenth-Century Fiction 35.3 (1980): 385–405. Print.10.2307/3044869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coriale, Danielle. “When Zoophytes Speak: Polyps and Naturalist Fantasy in the Age of Liberalism”. Nineteenth-Century Contexts 34.1 (2012): 19–36. Web. 1 Dec. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dames, Nicholas. The Physiology of the Novel: Reading, Neural Science, and the Form of Victorian Fiction. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. “The Image of Objectivity”. Representations 40.1 (1992): 81–128. JSTOR. Web. 7 Dec. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Michael. George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Psychology: Exploring the Unmapped Country. London: Ashgate, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian. The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Dolin, Tim. “George Eliot and Victorian Science.” George Eliot. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005. 190–215. Print.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Daniel Deronda. 1876. Ed. Graham Handley. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Impressions of Theophrastus Such. 1879. Ed. Nancy Henry. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. The Lifted Veil and Brother Jacob. 1859; 1864. Ed. Small, Helen. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. Print.10.1093/owc/9780199555055.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, George. Middlemarch. 1871-72. Ed. David Carroll and Felicia Bonaparte. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. “The Natural History of German Life.” 1856. Selected Essays, Poems, and Other Writings. Ed. Warren, Nicholas. London: Penguin Classics, 1990. 107–39. Print.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Rev. of Westward Ho!, by Charles Kingsley. Westminster Review 64 (1855): 288–307. Print.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. “To Mrs. Robert Lytton”. 8 July 1870. The George Eliot Letters, 1869-1873. Ed. Haight, Gordon Sherman. Vol. 5. New Haven: Yale UP, 1956. 106–07. Print. 9 vols. 1954–78.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry. Joseph Andrews. 1742. Ed. Martin C. Battestin. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 1967. Print.Google Scholar
Forster, E. M. Aspects of the Novel. London: Harcourt, 1956. Print.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, William W. “Theophrastus, the Characters and Rhetoric.” Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle. Ed. Mirhady, David C. and Fortenbaugh, . New Brunswick: Transaction, 1994. 15–35. Print.Google Scholar
Fuerst, John. “Concepts of Physiology, Reproduction, and Evolution of Machines in Samuel Butler's Erewhon and George Eliot's Impressions of Theophrastus Such”. Samuel Butler Newsletter 4.2 (1981): 31–53. Print.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. “George Eliot: Immanent Victorian”. Representations 90 (2005): 61–74. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcha, Amanpal. From Sketch to Novel: The Development of Victorian Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Garratt, Peter. Victorian Empiricism: Self, Knowledge, and Reality in Ruskin, Bain, Lewes, Spencer, and George Eliot. Cranberry: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Haight, Gordon Sherman. George Eliot: A Biography. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1968. Print.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Kristie. America's Sketchbook: Cultural Life of a Nineteenth-Century Literary Genre. Athens: Ohio UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Henkin, Leo Justin. Darwinism in the English Novel, 1860-1910: The Impact of Evolution on Victorian Fiction. New York: Russell, 1963. Print.Google Scholar
Henry, Nancy. “George Eliot, George Henry Lewes, and Comparative Anatomy.” George Eliot and Europe. Ed. Rignall, John. London: Scolar, 1997. 44–63. Print.Google Scholar
Henry, Nancy. Introduction. Impressions of Theophrastus Such.Google Scholar
By Eliot, George. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 1996. viixxxvii. Print.Google Scholar
Hertz, Neil. George Eliot's Pulse. Palo Alto: Stanford UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. Donald. “Theophrastus as Ecologist”. Environmental Review: ER 9.4 (1985): 297–306. Web. 22 Jan. 2011.Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon, 1978. Print.Google Scholar
King, Amy M. “Reorienting the Scientific Frontier: Victorian Tide Pools and Literary Realism”. Victorian Studies 47.2 (2005): 153–63. Print.Google Scholar
Lee, Vernon. Baldwin: Being Dialogues on Views and Aspirations. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1886. Print.Google Scholar
Levine, George. Dying to Know: Scientific Epistemology and Narrative in Victorian England. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2002. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, George. “George Eliot's Hypothesis of Reality”. Nineteenth-Century Fiction 35.1 (1980): 1–28. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewes, G. H. “Only a Pond!” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 85 (1859): 581–97. Print.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. Problems of Life and Mind. Ser. 3, vol. 2. London: Trübner, 1879. Print. 1874–79.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. Sea-side Studies at Ilfracombe, Tenby, the Scilly Isles, and Jersey. 1856-57. London: Blackwood and Sons, 1858. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewes, G. H. Studies in Animal Life. 1860. London: Smith, Elder, 1862. Print.10.5962/bhl.title.152905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Heather. “Close but Not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn”. New Literary History 41.2 (2010): 371–91. Print.Google Scholar
Lynch, Arthur. Human Documents: Character-Sketches of Representative Men and Women of the Time. London: Dobell, 1896. Print.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre. The Economy of Character: Novels, Market Culture, and the Business of Inner Meaning. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Merrill, Lynn L. The Romance of Victorian Natural History. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Miller, Joseph Hillis. The Form of Victorian Fiction: Thackeray, Dickens, Trollope, George Eliot, Meredith, and Hardy. Notre Dame: U of Notre Dame P, 1970. Print.Google Scholar
Millett, Paul. Theophrastus and His World. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Newton, K. M. “George Eliot and Racism: How Should One Read ‘The Modern Hep! Hep! Hep!‘?” Modern Language Review 103.3 (2008): 654–65. JSTOR. Web. 11 Mar. 2012.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. “On Truth and Lies in a Non-moral Sense.” 1896. The Nietzsche Reader. Ed. Ansell-Pearson, Keith and Large, Duncan. Oxford: Wiley, 2006. 114–23. Print.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1998. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyhart, Lynn K. “Natural History and the ‘New’ Biology.” Cultures of Natural History. Ed. Jardine, N., Secord, J. A., and Spary, E. C. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 426–43. Print.Google Scholar
Offer, John. “Free Agent or ‘Conscious Automaton‘? Contrasting Interpretations of the Individual in Spencer's Writing on Social and Moral Life”. Sociological Review 51.1 (2003): 1–19. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Walter. Imaginary Portraits. 1887. London: Macmillan, 1929. Print.Google Scholar
Pater, Walter. Studies in the History of the Renaissance. 1873. Ed. Matthew Beaumont. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritvo, Harriet. The Platypus and the Mermaid and Other Figments of the Classifying Imagination. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Ryan, Vanessa L. “Reading the Mind: From George Eliot's Fiction to James Sully's Psychology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 70.4 (2009): 615–35. Print.Google Scholar
Ryan, Vanessa L. Thinking without Thinking in the Victorian Novel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2012. Print.Google Scholar
Scott, Walter. Lives of Eminent Novelists and Dramatists. London: F. Warne, 1887. Print.Google Scholar
Secord, James A. Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Sha, Richard C. The Visual and Verbal Sketch in British Romanticism. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1998. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, R. W. Sources on Biology. Leiden: Brill Academic, 1992. Print. Vol. 5 of Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought, and Influence: Commentary. 9 vols.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, Sally. George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Science: The Make-Believe of a Beginning. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Singer, Charles. “Biology.” The Legacy of Greece. Ed. Livingstone, R. W. Oxford: Clarendon, 1921. 163–200. Print.Google Scholar
Sloan, Phillip. “The Gaze of Natural History.” Inventing Human Science: Eighteenth-Century Domains. Ed. Fox, Christopher, Porter, Roy, and Wokler, Robert. Berkeley: U of California P, 1995. 112–51. Print.Google Scholar
Sully, James. Sensation and Intuition: Studies in Psychology and Aesthetics. London: Henry S. King, 1874. Print.Google Scholar
Wormald, Mark. “Microscopy and Semiotic in Middle-march”. Nineteenth-Century Literature 50.4 (1996): 501–24. JSTOR. Web. 18 Dec. 2012.Google Scholar