Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-72crv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T04:54:09.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying neurobiological markers as predictors of antidepressant treatment using diffusion tensor imaging: A tract-based spatial statistical analysis of cingulate bundle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2025

Chunxia Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, P.R. China
Jiaxin Han
Affiliation:
The First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, P.R. China
Ning Sun
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, P.R. China Nursing College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, P.R. China
Penghong Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, P.R. China
Kerang Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, P.R. China
Aixia Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, P.R. China
Zhifen Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, P.R. China
*
Corresponding authors: Aixia Zhang and Zhifen Liu; Emails: aixia0909@163.com; liuzhifen5518@163.com
Corresponding authors: Aixia Zhang and Zhifen Liu; Emails: aixia0909@163.com; liuzhifen5518@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It was found that a significant number of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) did not respond to the treatment, leading to high ongoing costs and disease burden. The main objective of this study was to find neurobiological indicators that can predict the effectiveness of antidepressant treatment using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). A group of 103 patients who were experiencing their first episode of MDD were included in the study. After 2 weeks of SSRI treatment, the group of patients was split into two categories: ineffectiveand effective. The FMRIB Software Library (FSL) was used for diffusion data preprocessing to obtain tensor-based parameters such as FA, MD, AD, and RD. Tract-Based Spatial Statistical (TBSS) voxel-wise statistical analysis of the tensor-based parameters was carried out using the TBSS procedure in FSL. We conducted an investigation to determine if there were notable variations in neuroimaging attributes among the three groups. Compared to HC, the effective group showed significantly higher AD and MD values in the left CgH. Correlating neuroimaging characteristics and clinical manifestations revealed a significant positive correlation between CgH-l FA and clinical 2-week HAMD-17 total scores and a significant positive correlation between CgH-r FA and clinical 2-week HAMD-17 total scores. Functional damage to the cingulum bundle in the hippocampal region may predispose patients to MDD and predict antidepressant treatment outcomes. More extensive multicenter investigations are necessary to validate these MRI findings that indicate treatment effectiveness and assess their potential significance in practical therapeutic decision-making.

Information

Type
Original Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. General Demographic Information and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients with MDD and Normal Controls

Figure 1

Table 2. General Demographic Data and Clinical Characteristics of the Ineffective Group and the Effective Group

Figure 2

Figure 1. Example of the cingulate gyrus part of the cingulum and the parahippocampal part of the cingulum. A: Left CgC and CgH. B: Right CgC and CgH.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Anatomical location visualization of CgC and CgH in the cingulate tract.

Figure 4

Table 3. Neuroimaging Characteristic Differences of the Responsive, Unresponsive Groups, and Health Control Subjects at Baseline

Figure 5

Figure 3. Anatomical location visualization of the left CgH with significant differences.

Figure 6

Table 4. Significant Differences in Neuroimaging Characteristics (AD) of CgH_l Among the Responsive, Unresponsive Groups, and Health Control Subjects

Figure 7

Table 5. Significant Differences in Neuroimaging Characteristics28 of Cgh l Among the Responsive, Unresponsive Groups, and Health Control Subjects

Figure 8

Figure 4. Correlation between CgH-l FA and clinical 2-week HAMD-17 total scores.

Figure 9

Figure 5. Correlation between CgH-r FA and clinical 2-week HAMD-17 total scores.