No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Toward a Strategy for More Spatial Control: The Politics of MLK Street (Re)naming
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2024
Abstract
While the bulk of the study of the burgeoning movement to (re)name streets for Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) has predominantly been centered on the creation of a new geography of commemoration honoring the leader’s legacy and philosophy, little work has explicitly addressed the spatial motivations undergirding Black communities’ insistence on quickening the pace of such a process. This study strives to bring this point further by proposing to analyze the growing phenomenon of street naming for King in terms of Black communities’ relentless determination to challenge and reformulate the long-established practices shaping the MLK toponymic streetscape, especially in the southern part of the United States. On a deeper level, the paper reveals that Black communities and leaders use the spatial commemoration of King as a conduit for the acquisition of a more equitable share of and control over the urban landscape with their white counterparts. The politics of street naming thus lays bare the history and legacy of racial segregation in the South, the unfinished journey of the march for socio-spatial justice, and the rising power of Black communities.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with British Association for American Studies
References
1 Brasher, J., Alderman, D., and Subanthore, A., “Was Tulsa’s Brady Street Really Renamed? Racial (In)Justice, Memory-Work, and Neoliberalism’s Mandate of Least Disruption,” Social & Cultural Geography, 21, 9 (2020), CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tiwari, S. and Ambinakudige, S., “Streetscapes and Stereotyping: Streets Named after Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Geographies of Racial Identity,” GeoJournal, 87, 1 (2020), 1–14Google Scholar.
2 Agnew, J. A., Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society (Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987)Google Scholar; M. Hannah, “Space and Social Control in the Administration of the Oglala Lakota (‘Sioux’), 1871–1979,” Journal of Historical Geography, 19 (1993), 412–32; Hershkovitz, L., “Tiananmen Square and the Politics of Place,” Political Geography, 12 (1993), 395–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mitchell, D., “Iconography and Locational Conflict from the Underside: Free Speech, People’s Park, and the Politics of Homelessness in Berkeley, California,” Political Geography, 11 (1992), 152–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Carter, P., The Road to Botany Bay: An Essay in Spatial History (London: Faber and Faber, 1987)Google Scholar; Berg, L. and Kearns, R., “Naming as Norming: ‘Race’, Gender, and the Identity Politics of Naming Places in Aotearoa/New Zealand,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14 (1996), 99–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Myers, G., “Naming and Placing the Other: Power and the Urban Landscape in Zanzibar,” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 87 (1996) 237–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Yeoh, B., “Street-Naming and Nation-Building: Toponymic Inscriptions of Nationhood in Singapore,” Area, 28 (1996), 298–307Google Scholar; Nash, C., “Irish Place Names: Post-colonial Locations,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS 24 (1999), 457–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Whelan, Y., “Mapping Meanings in the Cultural Landscape,” in Ashworth, G. and Graham, B., eds., Senses of Place: Senses of Time (Aldershot: Ashgate 2005), 61–71Google Scholar.
4 Caliendo, G., “MLK Boulevard: Material Forms of Memory and the Social Contestation of Racial Signification,” Journal of Black Studies, 42, 7 (2011), 1148–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tichavakunda, A., “A Critical Race Analysis of University Acts of Racial ‘Redress’: The Limited Potential of Racial Symbols,” Educational Policy, 35, 2 (2020), 304–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Brasher, J., “Place (Re)Naming,” in Post, C., Greiner, A., and Buckley, G., eds., The Routledge Companion to the American Landscape (New York: Routledge, 2023), 243–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Brundage, F., The Southern Past: A Clash of Race and Memory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.
7 Tilove, J. and Falco, M., Along Martin Luther King: Travels on Black America’s Main Street (New York: Random House, 2003), 21)Google Scholar.
8 Till, K., “Wounded Cities: Memory-Work and a Place-Based Ethics of Care,” Political Geography, 31 (2012), 3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Till, K. and Kuusisto-Arponen, A., “Towards Responsible Geographies of Memory: Complexities of Place and the Ethics of Remembering,” Erdkunde, 69, 4, (2015), 291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Swart, M., “Name Changes as Symbolic Reparation after Transition: The Examples of Germany and South Africa,” German Law Journal, 9, 2 (2008), 105–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Adebanwi, W., “Coloring ‘Rainbow’ Streets: The Struggle for Toponymic Multiculturalism in Urban Post-apartheid South Africa,” in Rose-Redwood, R., Alderman, D., and Azaryahu, M., eds., The Political Life of Urban Streetscapes: Naming, Politics, and Place (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2018), 277–303Google Scholar.
10 Alderman, D., “Street Names and the Scaling of Memory: The Politics of Commemorating Martin Luther King, Jr. within the African-American Community,” Area, 35, 2 (2003), 163–73, 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Till; Till and Kuusisto-Arponen; Brasher, Alderman, and Subanthore, “Was Tulsa’s Brady Street Really Renamed?”; Brasher.
12 D. Delaney, Race, Place, and the Law, 1836–1948 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1998); E. Boddie, “Racial Territoriality,” UCLA Law Review, 58 (2010) 401–63.
13 C. Hawthorne, “Black Matters Are Spatial Matters: Black Geographies for the Twenty-First Century,” Geography Compass, 13, 11 (2019), 1–13.
14 Delaney, Race, Place, and the Law; D. Delaney, “The Space that Race Makes,” Professional Geographer, 54 (2002), 6–14; G. Lipsitz, “The Racialization of Space and the Spatialization of Race,” Landscape Journal, 26 (2007), 10–23; E. Hanafi, “The Spa-cial Formation Theory: Transcending the Race–Class Binary in Environmental Justice Literature,” Antipode, 49, 2 (2017), 397–415.
15 Delaney, Race, Place, and the Law; Lipsitz.
16 K. McKittrick, “On Plantations, Prisons, and a Black Sense of Place,” Social & Cultural Geography, 12, 8 (2011), 947–63; J. Inwood, “Righting Unrightable Wrongs: Legacies of Racial Violence and the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 6 (2012), 1450–67.
17 L. Pulido, “Geographies of Race and Ethnicity II: Environmental Racism, Racial Capitalism and State-Sanctioned Violence,” Progress in Human Geography, 41, 4 (2017), 524–33.
18 Boddie, 412.
19 K. McKittrick, “Plantation Futures,” Small Axe, 45 (2013), 1–15.
20 J. Inwood, “Making the Legal Visible: Wilhelmina Griffin Jones’ Experience of Living in Alabama during Segregation,” Southeastern Geographer, 45, 1 (2005), 54–66, 59.
21 E. Guffey, “Knowing Their Space: Signs of Jim Crow in the Segregated South,” Design Issues, 28, 2 (2012), 41–60.
22 L. Litwack, Trouble in the Mind: Black Southerners in the Age of Jim Crow (New York: Vintage Books, 1998), 16.
23 M. Omi and H. Winant, Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s, 3rd edn (New York: Routledge, 2014).
24 Tiwari and Ambinakudige, “Streetscapes and Stereotyping,” 2.
25 A. Giroux, “Violence, Katrina, and the Biopolitics of Disposability,” Theory, Culture and Society, 24, 7–8 (2007), 305–9; U. Linke, “Racializing Cities, Naturalizing Space: The Seductive Appeal of Iconicities of Dispossession,” Antipode, 46, 5 (2015), 1222–39.
26 L. Wacquant and J. Howe, Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality (Cambridge: Polity, 2008); I. Audirac, “Shrinking Cities: An Unfit Term for American Urban Policy?”, Cities, 75 (2018), 12–19; C. Bonam, C. Yantis, and V. J. Taylor, “Invisible Middleclass Black Space: Asymmetrical Person and Space Stereotyping at the Race–Class Nexus,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23, 1 (2018), 24–47; Tiwari and Ambinakudige.
27 K. McKittrick, Demonic Grounds: Black Women and the Cartographies of Struggle (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006); B. Satter, Family Properties: Race, Real Estate, and the Exploitation of Black Urban America (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2009); R. Brahinsky, “Race and the City: The (Re)development of Urban Identity,” Geography Compass, 5, 3 (2011), 144–53, Brahinsky, “Race and the Making of Southeast San Fransisco: Toward a Theory of Race-Class,” Antipode, 46, 5 (2013), 125–76.
28 C. Mills, “Black Trash,” in L. Westra and B. Lawson, eds., Faces of Environmental Racism (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001), 73–91; Hanafi, “The Spa-cial Formation Theory.”
29 D. Gabbard, “Arguments against Street Renaming Flawed,” Daily Reflector, 9 July 2006, D1; Caliendo, “MLK Boulevard.”
30 McKittrick, Demonic Grounds; Satter; Brahinsky, “Race and the City”; Brahinsky, “Race and the Making of Southeast San Fransisco.”
31 Hawthorne, “Black Matters are Spatial Matters,” 8–9.
32 R. Rose-Redwood, D. Alderman, and M. Azaryahu, The Political Life of Urban Streetscapes: Naming, Politics, and Place (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2018), 1–2.
33 P. Nora, “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire,” Representations, 26 (1989), 7–25; S. Legg, “Sites of Counter-memory: The Refusal to Forget and the Nationalist Struggle in Colonial Delhi,” Historical Geography, 33 (2005), 180–201.
34 B. Schwartz, Abraham Lincoln and the Forge of National Memory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000); R. Flores, Remembering the Alamo: Memory, Modernity, and the Master Symbol (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002); B. Forest and J. Johnson, “Unraveling the Threads of History: Soviet-Era Monuments and Post-Soviet National Identity in Moscow,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92 (2002), 524–47; M. Sturken, “Memorializing Absence,” in C. Calhoun, P. Price, and A. Timmer, eds., Understanding September U (New York: The Free Press, 2002), 374–84; D. Alderman and S. Hoelscher, “Memory and Place: Geographies of a Critical Relationship,” Social & Cultural Geography, 5, 3 (2004), 347–55; D. Alderman, “Surrogation and the Politics of Remembering Slavery in Savannah, Georgia,” Journal of Historical Geography, 36 (2010), 90–101.
35 M. Schudson, “The Present in the Past versus the Past in the Present,” Communication, 11 (1989), 105–13, 112, square brackets in original.
36 D. Alderman, “Creating a New Geography of Memory in the South: (Re)naming of Streets in Honor of Martin Luther King, Jr.,” Southeastern Geographer, 36 (1996), 51–69, 51.
37 Ibid.; R. Stump, “Toponymic Commemoration of National Figures: The Cases of Kennedy and King,” Names, 36 (1988), 203–16.
38 D. Alderman and J. Inwood, “Street Naming and the Politics of Belonging: Spatial Injustices in the Toponymic Commemoration of Martin Luther King, Jr.,” Social & Cultural Geography, 14, 2 (2013), 211–33.
39 D. Alderman and R. Rose-Redwood, “The Classroom as ‘Toponymic Workspace’: Towards a Critical Pedagogy of Campus Place Renaming,” Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44, 21 (2020), 124–41; Tiwari and Ambinakudige, “Streetscapes and Stereotyping”; Brasher, “Place (Re)Naming.”
40 Tretter, E., “The Power of Naming: The Toponymic Geographies of Commemorated African Americans,” Professional Geographer, 63, 1 (2011), 34–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
41 Alderman, “Street Names and the Scaling of Memory.”
42 Rose-Redwood, R., “From Number to Name: Symbolic Capital, Places of Memory and the Politics of Street Renaming in New York City,” Social & Cultural Geography, 9, 4 (2008), 431–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
43 C. Johnson, “Black Leaders React to Vote to Rename Bypass for King,” Daily Reflector, 12 Aug. 2006, A1; S. Batchelor, “Council Meeting Racially Charged,” Daily Reflector, 9 March 2007, A1; Schein, R., “Belonging through Land/scape,” Environment and Planning A, 41 (2009), 811–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 D. Alderman, “Naming Streets for Martin Luther King, Jr.: No Easy Road,” in R. Schein, ed., Landscape and Race in the United States (New York: Routledge, 2006), 213–36.
45 Alderman, D., “School Names as Cultural Arenas: The Naming of US Public Schools after Martin Luther King, Jr.,” Urban Geography, 23, 7 (2002), 601–26, 602CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
46 Alderman, “Creating a New Geography of Memory in the South,” :57.
47 Purcell, M., “Excavating Lefebvre: The Right to the City and Its Urban Politics of the Inhabitant,” GeoJournal, 58 (2002), 99–108, 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar, emphasis added.
48 Kadmon, N., “Toponymy and Geopolitics: The Political Use – and Misuse – of Geographical Names,” Cartographic Journal, 41 (2004), 85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
49 Brasher, Alderman, and Subanthore, “Was Tulsa’s Brady Street Really Renamed?”, 15.
50 R. Rose-Redwood, D. Alderman and J. Inwood, “Street Naming and the Politics of Belonging: Spatial Injustices in the Toponymic Commemoration of Martin Luther King, Jr.,” in Rose-Redwood, Alderman, and Azaryahu, The Political Life of Urban Streetscapes, 328–46.
51 D’Souza, D., The End of Racism (New York: Free Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Bruyneel, K., “The Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial and the Politics of Collective Memory,” History and Memory, 26, 1 (2014), 75–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
52 Alderman and Inwood, “Street Naming and the Politics of Belonging,” Social & Cultural Geography, 221.
53 Tiwari and Ambinakudige, “Streetscapes and Stereotyping.”
54 Quoted in “Whites in Burke County Win Fight over Renaming Road,” Atlanta Constitution, 13 Jan. 1989, A18.
55 Quoted in Rose-Redwood, Alderman, and Azaryahu, The Political Life of Urban Streetscapes, 342.
56 C. Headrick, “NAACP Wants Martin Luther King Jr.: A Venue Moved,” St. Petersburg Times, 31 Aug. 2001, 7, added emphasis.
57 Alderman, “Creating a New Geography of Memory in the South”; Alderman, “Street Names and the Scaling of Memory.”
58 Alderman, “Creating a New Geography of Memory in the South,” 60.
59 Alderman, “Naming Streets for Martin Luther King.”
60 P. Wilcox, “Unity Asked in Street Name Change,” Chattanooga Times, 25 March 1981, B1.
61 Roediger, D., The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class (New York: Verso, 2007)Google Scholar.
62 Alderman, “Creating a New Geography of Memory in the South,” 52.