Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-wvcvf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T11:14:48.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slurry Utilization Efficiency Studies in Chemical Mechanical Planarization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ara Philipossian  and
Erin Mitchell
Ara Philipossian
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering The University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
Erin Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering The University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
Get access

Abstract

The residence time distribution of slurry in the pad-wafer interface was experimentally determined and used to calculate the slurry utilization efficiency (η) of the CMP process. Slurry utilization efficiency represents the percentage of slurry that actually participates in the polish by entering the region bounded between the wafer and the pad. Results show that η ranges from 2 to 22 percent, depending on operating conditions such as applied wafer pressure, relative pad wafer velocity, slurry flow rate and pad surface texture (i.e. type of pad grooving).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 767: Symposium F – Chemical-Mechanical Planarization , 2003 , F1.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Stein, D. Hetherington, D. Dugger, M. and Stout, T.: Journal of Electronic Materials. Vol. 25, No. 10, p. 1623 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Kim, K. Moon, S. and Jeong, H.: Electrochemical Society Proceedings, Vol. 99-37, p. 402 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Sikder, A. Giglio, F. Wood, J. Kumar, A. and Anthony, M.: Journal of Electronic Materials. Vol. 30, No. 12, -. 1520 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Holland, K.: Micro, Vol. 20, No. 4 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Philipossian, A. and Mitchell, E.: Micro, Vol. 20, No. 7, p. 85 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Philipossian, A. and Olsen, S. Proceedings of the CMP-MIC Conference, Marina Del Rey, CA (2003).Google Scholar
7. Levenspiel, O. Chemical Reaction Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1972).Google Scholar
8. Froment, G. and Bischoff, K. Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1979).Google Scholar
9. Lu, J. M.S. Thesis, Tufts University, MA. USA (2001).Google Scholar
10. Mitchell, E. M.S. Thesis, University of Arizona, AZ. USA (2002).Google Scholar