Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-7262s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-10T22:00:07.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of a Central Line Infection Prevention Bundle in Newborn Infants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2016

Rowena McMullan*
Affiliation:
Department of Newborn Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Women and Babies, Sydney, Australia Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Adrienne Gordon
Affiliation:
Department of Newborn Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Women and Babies, Sydney, Australia Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
*
Address correspondence to Rowena McMullan, FRACP, Department of Newborn Care, Royal Prince Alfred Women and Babies, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia (rowenamcm@gmail.com).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare central line use and central line–associated bloodstream infection in newborn infants before and after the introduction of a central line infection prevention bundle in order to determine the effectiveness of the bundle and to identify areas for further improvement.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Level 5 neonatal intensive care unit in Sydney, Australia.

PATIENTS

Newborn infants admitted to the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit who had a central venous catheter (CVC) inserted.

METHODS

Data regarding clinical characteristics, CVC use, and infection were collected before and after the introduction of a bundle of interventions. The bundles encompassed (1) insertion of CVC, (2) maintenance of CVC, (3) an education program, and (4) ongoing surveillance and feedback.

RESULTS

Baseline and intervention groups were comparable in clinical characteristics. The number of CVCs inserted was reduced in the intervention group (central line utilization rate, 0.16 vs 0.2, P<.0001). Overall CVC dwell time was reduced, resulting from significant reduction in peripherally inserted CVC dwell time (6 days [95% CI, 5.0–11.8 days] vs 7.3 days [4.0–10.4 days], P=.0004). Central line–associated bloodstream infections were significantly reduced, predominantly secondary to decreased peripherally inserted CVC–related bloodstream infections (1.2/1,000 central line–days vs 11.5/1,000 central line–days, P<.0001).

CONCLUSION

This central line infection bundle was effective in reducing CVC use, dwell time, and central line–associated bloodstream infections.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1029–1036

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 
Figure 0

FIGURE 1 Fishbone diagram highlighting process failures in prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI).

Figure 1

TABLE 1 Baseline and Intervention Central Line Practices

Figure 2

TABLE 2 Characteristics of Infants With Central Lines Inserted

Figure 3

FIGURE 2 Dwell time of central venous catheters in the baseline and intervention groups. PCVC, peripherally inserted central venous catheter; UVC, umbilical venous catheter.

Figure 4

FIGURE 3 Reduction in central venous catheter dwell time in the intervention period across gestational age cohorts.

Figure 5

FIGURE 4 Run chart of central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) per 1,000 central line–days 2012–2015

Figure 6

TABLE 3 Central Line–Associated Infection Rates