The Role of Developmental Reviewing and the Pursuit of Good Science – ERRATUM

Felipe A. Guzman; Carrie A. Bulger; Adam J. Vanhove

doi:10.1017/iop.2026.10091

The Role of Developmental Reviewing and the Pursuit of Good Science – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 April 2026

Felipe A. Guzman ,

Carrie A. Bulger and

Adam J. Vanhove

Article contents

Abstract
References

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type: Erratum
Information: Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2026 , pp. 122

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2026.10091 [Opens in a new window]
Creative Commons: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright: © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

This commentary was mistakenly left out of Volume 19 Issue 1, and should have been included alongside the Focal Article “Developmental reviewing: Is it really good for science?” (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2025.10045).

The commentary has been added to the issue retrospectively, and the Publisher regrets this omission.

References

Guzman, FA, Bulger, CA, Vanhove, AJ. The role of developmental reviewing and the pursuit of good science. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Published online 2026:1–4. doi: 10.1017/iop.2025.10051CrossRef Google Scholar