Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bkrcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T19:43:44.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A natural example of brittle-to-viscous strain localization under constant-stress conditions: a case study of the Kellyland fault zone, Maine, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2021

Walter A. Sullivan*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Colby College, 5800 Mayflower Hill, Waterville, Maine 04901, USA
Emma J. O’Hara
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Colby College, 5800 Mayflower Hill, Waterville, Maine 04901, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Walter A. Sullivan, Email: wasulliv@colby.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article integrates field, powder X-ray diffraction and microstructural data to constrain deformation mechanisms in and the rheology of granite-derived fault rocks exposed along the SE side of the crustal-scale, strike-slip Kellyland fault zone. Deformation in this area of the Kellyland fault zone localized during cooling and is marked by (1) foliated granite, (2) a ∼50 m wide band of pulverized foliated granite, (3) a ∼2.8 m wide breccia zone hosting coeval shear zones, and (4) a >100 m wide ultramylonite zone. The earliest fabric in the foliated granite is defined by elongated quartz grains, and quartz dislocation creep was the rate-controlling deformation mechanism. Seismogenic deformation initiated when recorded flow stresses reached 96–104 MPa at temperatures of 400–450 °C and is marked by coeval pulverization and formation of breccia. Interseismic viscous creep at similar flow stresses is recorded by mutual cross-cutting relationships between breccia-hosted shear zones, brittle fractures and pseudotachylyte. Field and microstructural observations indicate that breccia-hosted shear zones are low-strain equivalents of the >100 m wide ultramylonite zone, and seismogenic deformation abated as the ultramylonite formed. The rheology of ultramylonites was governed by grain-size-sensitive creep at 112–124 MPa flow stresses. Hence, from the onset of seismogenesis, the Kellyland fault zone was likely a constant-stress system wherein the rate-controlling mechanism shifted from episodic seismogenic slip and interseismic viscous creep to steady state grain-size-sensitive creep in ultramylonites derived from brittle fault rocks. Flow stresses recorded by these rocks also imply that the whole zone was relatively weak if the brittle–viscous transition and uppermost viscous zone are the strongest part of the crust.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Simplified bedrock map of Maine, USA, showing the Norumbega fault system and correlative dextral strike-slip faults. DG – Deblois granite; LG – Lucerne granite; KFZ – Kellyland fault zone. (b) Geologic map of the study area showing strain facies in the KFZ and sample locations. Exact location of KL51 shown in figure 2 of Sullivan et al. (2013). (c) Measurements of foliation and lineation from the area of (b). Maps modified from Sullivan & Peterman (2017). Geology compiled from Osberg et al. (1985), Goldstein & Hepburn (1999), New Brunswick Department of Resources & Energy (2000), Ludman & Berry (2003), Wang & Ludman (2004), Hibbard et al. (2006), Wang (2007, 2011, 2020a,b) and Sullivan et al. (2013). Foliation and lineation measurements from Sullivan et al. (2013).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Geologic map of the present study area showing foliated-granite, localized-shear-zone and main-ultramylonite domains as well as locations of samples. (b) Strip map of site KL102 showing the distribution of rock types and sample locations across the SE margin of the main-ultramylonite domain.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Textures visible in outcrop. Coin used for scale is 1.8 cm in diameter. View for all images is straight down onto subhorizontal surfaces. (a) S-C fabrics indicating dextral motion at KL110. Note blocky, cleavage-controlled weathering of microcline grains. (b) Breccia at KL102-K. (c) Breccia-hosted shear zones at KL102-K. Arrow points to a discrete fault surface that merges with the shear-zone fabric towards the bottom left of the image and the breccia fabric towards the top right of the image.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Cross-polarized-light images of probable recrystallized pseudotachylyte in breccia sample KL102-E. (a) Injection vein hosted in breccia. Note the round quartz and feldspar clasts, abundance of biotite in the matrix and flow banding following the outline of the vein. (b) Brownish-grey-weathering ultramylonite zone. Note the elongated clasts and the abundance of biotite in the matrix.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Powder-XRD patterns from samples collected across the present study area and undeformed- and foliated-granite samples from outside the present study area. Strain facies are given on the left-hand side of the plot and sample locations on the right. Note that there is very little change in mineralogy across the present study area, which is consistent with Sullivan et al.’s (2013) finding that there is no significant chemical alteration of granite-derived fault rocks across the KFZ.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Full-thin-section BSE scans with high-atomic-mass phases used in the CI analysis rendered in yellow. All images are ∼25 mm in the short direction. Sample locations are given in the upper right-hand corner of each image. (a) Undeformed granite. See figure 6 of Sullivan & Peterman (2017) for cross-polarized-light and CL images of this thin-section. (b) Foliated granite. See figure 7 of Sullivan & Peterman (2017) for cross-polarized-light and CL images of this thin-section. (c, d) Pulverized foliated granite. Boxes in (c) show locations of fracture maps in figure 5 of Sullivan & Peterman (2017). (e) Breccia. (f) Breccia-hosting tip of shear zone. (g) Contact between breccia on left and mylonite of a breccia-hosted shear zone on right. (h) Mylonite from the breccia-to-ultramylonite transition at the SE margin of the main-ultramylonite domain. Areas of images in Figures 8, 9, 10, 11 and online Supplementary Material Figure S1 are noted. Mineral abbreviations: ab – albite; bt – biotite; mc – microcline; qtz – quartz.

Figure 6

Table 1. Two-dimensional quartz recrystallized grain-size distributions in μm and flow stresses in MPa calculated from RMS grain sizes using the Stipp & Tullis (2003) piezometer

Figure 7

Table 2. Microfracture density in microcline

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Pairs of cross-polarized-light images showing representative quartz textures from across the present study area. The right-hand images show parts of the left-hand images at ten-times greater magnification. (a) Part of a C domain with recrystallized quartz and biotite from site KL110. (b) Part of an elongated quartz grain in a pulverized-foliated-granite sample from site KL115. Arrow in left-hand image highlights biotite-filled fracture that is offset across the boundaries of a relict quartz grain. (c) Quartz clast in breccia from site KL102-J. Albite fragments in a network of biotite-filled fractures are visible in the top-right corner of the low-magnification image, and matrix consisting of comminuted feldspar + biotite is visible in the bottom of this image. Arrows in left-hand image highlight biotite-filled fractures cutting the quartz microstructure. (d) Folded and boudinaged quartz band in ultramylonite from the breccia-to-ultramylonite transition zone at site KL102-H. Note that biotite grains in the matrix surrounding the quartz body are uniformly bright because the polarizers are inclined at 30° to the foliation.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. CI values for high-atomic-mass phases (primarily biotite) versus distance across strike from the SE margin of the main-ultramylonite domain. Data are separated by image class: full-thin-section BSE scans and 1 mm wide images of mylonitic matrix. Both image types were analysed for samples KL102-G and KL102-H. We analysed four 1 mm wide images of homogeneous-ultramylonite samples and three 1 mm wide images of KL102-G and KL102-H, but some results are so close that they are not resolvable on the plot. Some of the full-thin-section images used in the CI analysis are shown in Figure 6, and some of the 1 mm wide images are shown in Figure 11. The corresponding figure numbers are shown for these data points. Note that CI values in the foliated granite and pulverized foliated granite are similar to the undeformed-granite sample. This shows that foliation formation and pulverization did not significantly contribute to disaggregation of high-atomic-mass phases.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Microstructure in a relatively intact microcline domain in breccia of sample KL102-B. (a) BSE and CL images of the same field of view. White arrows highlight dilational fractures separating angular microcline clasts. White rectangle highlights a small cataclastic shear zone. Circle outlines area of fracture maps in (b). Image location within the thin-section is shown in Figure 6g. Mineral abbreviations are the same as in Figure 6. (b) Map of microfractures within microcline clasts and rose diagrams showing fracture orientations relative to the images in (a). Sample sites for fracture-density measurements i–v (Table 2) also are shown.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. BSE images showing textures in breccia-hosted shear zones. (a) Fine-grained polyphase matrix and elongated quartz pod. The quartz pod is offset by a discrete fracture that is rotated by subsequent dextral simple shear in the surrounding matrix. (b) Transition from chaotic breccia fabric on left to mylonitic fabric defined by compositional layering on right. (c) High-magnification image of part of the mylonitic fabric in (b). Notice biotite grains hosted in dilational sites between albite fragments and the fine-grained matrix of microcline + albite ± biotite. Mineral abbreviations are the same as in Figure 6.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. BSE images of samples from the breccia-to-ultramylonite transition zone and main-ultramylonite domain. (a) Mylonite sample KL102-G with discontinuous layered fabric from the transition zone. (b) Homogeneous-ultramylonite sample KL102-C of the main-ultramylonite domain. (c) High-magnification image of KL102-C. Polygons highlight four-grain junctions. High-atomic-mass phases in (a) and (b) used in the CI analysis are rendered in yellow. Mineral abbreviations are the same as in Figure 6.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Cross-polarized-light images showing quartz recrystallization textures from the main-ultramylonite domain. (a) Part of a recrystallized quartz boudin in homogeneous-ultramylonite sample. (b) Part of a recrystallized quartz ribbon in a pinstripe-ultramylonite sample.

Figure 14

Fig. 13. (a) Schematic plot showing inferred stress conditions versus time and dimensionless shear strain versus time for the KFZ in the present study area. Rounded rectangles highlight stress conditions recorded by different strain facies, structures, rock types and/or samples. Coseismic stress pulses in the centre of the plot are inferred based on the evidence for seismogenic slip, and the magnitude of these pulses is unconstrained. (b) Sketch map showing inferred regional geology during initial foliation development in the Deblois granite. (c) Inferred regional geology when peak-stress conditions were recorded in the main-ultramylonite domain. (d) Present-day map pattern around the Norumbega fault system in eastern Maine. DG – Deblois granite; LG – Lucerne granite; KFZ – Kellyland fault zone. Panels (b–d) compiled and adapted from Ludman & Berry (2003), Wang & Ludman (2004) and Wang (2007, 2011, 2020a,b).

Supplementary material: File

Sullivan and O’Hara supplementary material

Sullivan and O’Hara supplementary material 1

Download Sullivan and O’Hara supplementary material(File)
File 42 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sullivan and O’Hara supplementary material

Sullivan and O’Hara supplementary material 2

Download Sullivan and O’Hara supplementary material(File)
File 43.5 KB