Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T02:58:09.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Donaldsonian Themes: A Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2016

Thomas Donaldson
Thomas Donaldson*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The articles in the special issue of Business Ethics Quarterly (2015), “Normative Business Ethics in a Global Economy: New Directions on Donaldsonian Themes,” were written by a set of outstanding scholars: Margaret M. Blair, Joseph P. Gaspar, Nien-hê Hsieh, Peter L. Jennings, Marietta Peytcheva, Andreas Georg Scherer, Amy J. Sepinwall, Andrew Stark, Danielle E. Warren, and Manuel Velasquez. In this commentary I reply to my colleagues, arranging my reply around the following themes: 1) the corporate moral agent; 2) the idea of a social contract for business; 3) managing ethics within corporations; and 4) values in business. I discuss each in turn. However, I reflect first on my idiosyncratic approach to business ethics.

Keywords

social contractpersonhoodmoral agencythought experimentbusiness ethicshypernorm

Information

Type
Commentary
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 125 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, D. G. 2016. Corporations and human rights obligations. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(2): 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blachowicz, J. 2016. There is no scientific method. The New York Times, July 4.Google Scholar
Blair, M. M. 2015. Of corporations, courts, personhood, and morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4): 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.). 2014. Jürgen habermas . (Vol. Fall 2014 Edition).Google Scholar
Caux Round Table. 2009. Principles for responsible business , updated May 2010. http://www.cauxroundtable.org/index.cfm?&menuid=8%20 Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1982. Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1985. Nuclear deterrence and self-defense. Ethics, 95(3): 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1989. The ethics of international business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1990a. Morally privileged relationships. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 24 (Spring): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1990b. Morally privileged relationships. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 24(Spring): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1996. Values in tension: Ethics away from home. Harvard Business Review, 74(5): 48–62.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 2001. The ethical wealth of nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(1): 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. 1999. Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics: Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Walsh, J. P. 2015. Toward a theory of business. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35: 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & deColle, S. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1964. The language of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hsieh, N. 2015. The social contract model of corporate purpose and responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4): 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. 1777. An enquiry concerning human understanding. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Jennings, P. L., & Velasquez, M. 2015. Towards an ethical wealth of nations: An institutional perspective on the relation between ethical values and national economic prosperity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4): 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1785. Foundations of the metaphysics of morals (Beck, L. W., Trans.) (1959 ed.). New York: Library of Liberal Arts.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1788. Critique of practical reason (Beck, L. W., Trans.) (1956 ed.). New York: Library of Liberal Arts.Google Scholar
Kell, G., & Ruggie, J. G. 1999. Global markets and social legitimacy: The case of the ‘global compact.’ Paper presented at the Governing the Public Domain beyond the Era of the Washington Consensus? Redrawing the Line Between the State and the Market, York University, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Kim, T. W., & Donaldson, T. 2016. Rethinking right: Moral epistemology in management research. Journal of Business Ethics , doi:10.1007/s10551-015-3009-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C., & Pettit, P. 2011. Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, J. J., & Robertson, E. F. 2004. Newton’s bucket . St. Andrews University, UK: http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/Newton_bucket.html.Google Scholar
Ohtani, H. 2010. Putnam’s moral realism . The 16th International Meeting of Hongo Metaphysics Club: 176–197. The University of Tokyo: http://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2261/43993/1/bda007008.pdf.Google Scholar
Passmore, J. A. 1961. Philosophical reasoning. London: G. Duckworth.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1968. The republic (Bloom, A., Trans.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1978. Meaning and the moral sciences. London; Boston: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 2004. Ethics without ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1930. The right and the good. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. 2008a. Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights . http://www.reports-and-materials.org/sites/default/files/reports-and-materials/Ruggie-report-7-Apr-2008.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. 2008b. Embedding global markets: An enduring challenge. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G. 2015. Can hypernorms be justified? Insights from a discourse-ethical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4): 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, M., & Reyes, G. L. 2015. Integrative social contract theory and the enduring promise of justified hypernorms : 1–28. Unpublished work.Google Scholar
Sepinwall, A. J. 2015. Denying corporate rights and punishing corporate wrongs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4): 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Dublin: Whitestone.Google Scholar
Strudler, A. 2015. Normative business ethics in a global economy: New directions on Donaldsonian themes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4): xvii-xxi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, A. 2015. Inverting Donaldson’s framework: A managerial approach to international conflicts of cultural and economic norms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4): 535–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tittle, P. 2005. What if– : Collected thought experiments in philosophy. New York: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1948. The universal declaration of human rights. General Assembly resolution 217(III), http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.Google Scholar
Warren, D. E., Peytcheva, M., & Gaspar, J. P. 2015. When ethical tones at the top conflict: Adapting priority rules to reconcile conflicting tones. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4): 559–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 1985. Persons, rights, and corporations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar